×

Wir verwenden Cookies, um LingQ zu verbessern. Mit dem Besuch der Seite erklärst du dich einverstanden mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinien.


image

Asd 3, Economist explains the two futures of crypto | Tyler Cowen

Economist explains the two futures of crypto | Tyler Cowen

- All right.

So now let's move on to cryptocurrency.

You need to drink water or anything before we switch topics?

- Let's try crypto without water-

but we'll see.

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Cryptocurrency becomes more popular,

we're starting to see signs

that it could become part of our financial future.'

- Cryptocurrency is a truly new idea,

and it's rare that we have truly, fundamentally new ideas.

Think of Bitcoin as a kind of recordkeeping system,

and you pay people in Bitcoin to validate the records,

and you move on to the next day

and every day, every moment, you have a new set of records-

and this process is self-enforcing.

It cannot easily be overruled

by an outside authority or central authority.

So it's like you have, at the same time,

potentially a new kind of money,

a new kind of investment asset,

and also, actually, a new kind of computer.

So when I talk to people who are deeply into crypto,

I often feel quite skeptical.

They have such bold, grand plans,

and I'm not convinced they've thought through

how to carry it all out.

At the same time, I know many people

who dismiss crypto altogether.

They think it's a scam or a bubble or a fraud.

And when I talk to them, I feel quite bullish about crypto.

I see a lot of potential in the ideas,

but I don't think we know yet how useful crypto will be.

Here are some reasons why the crypto-skeptics are skeptical:

People use crypto to pay off ransoms.

Let's say hackers will go

into the medical records of a hospital,

pull out or lock or freeze that information,

and they won't give it back

until they're paid off in crypto.

You can't ever get your money back.

It's an irreversible transaction done on the blockchain.

That's the end of it.

Crypto itself, in most of its current forms,

it consumes a lot of energy.

You have computers racing to make calculations

to crack different kinds of cryptographic problems.

And those computers use so much energy

that it damages the environment through carbon emissions

in a way that we understand pretty well now.

But maybe the biggest reason to be crypto-skeptical

is simply that a lot of the promised benefits

haven't happened yet.

"Well, it's gonna make banking cheaper."

"It's gonna make finance cheaper."

"It's gonna make lending cheaper."

Maybe those dreams are just impossible,

or impossible anytime soon.

And if people are skeptical

about the promised benefits of crypto,

they have some good reasons to be skeptical.

Here's a way to think about 'the bullish case' for crypto:

Imagine that the internet

becomes more and more its own economy

with its own series of rules,

and that economy is a global one.

It will need its own systems of recordkeeping,

its own systems of property rights,

its own way of consummating transactions.

We'll need a new institution to do all those things,

and crypto is actually the best bet that we have.

If that occurs, and many people think it will,

it probably would be possible for me,

say, to take part of my checking account

and just by sending a single message,

lend some of it out to say, farmers in Kenya.

The world would be more global.

I would be better off. They would be better off.

There'd be this new system, some call it the 'Metaverse,'

others just call it the 'expanded internet,'

where we would own more things on the internet,

have these secure property rights

validated by the blockchain,

have new investment assets,

and moving resources around the world

would be much easier, cheaper.

That is speculative,

but it is not what I would call "crazy speculative."

It's a possibility,

and we're going to see if that's what's going to happen.

Economist explains the two futures of crypto | Tyler Cowen Ökonom erklärt die zwei Zukünfte von Krypto | Tyler Cowen Un economista explica los dos futuros de las criptomonedas | Tyler Cowen エコノミストが語る暗号の2つの未来|Tyler Cowen 경제학자가 설명하는 암호화폐의 두 가지 미래 | 타일러 코웬 Economista explica os dois futuros das criptomoedas | Tyler Cowen Экономист объясняет два варианта будущего криптовалют | Тайлер Коуэн Економіст пояснив два майбутні криптовалют | Тайлер Коуен 经济学家解释加密货币的两种未来 |泰勒·考恩 經濟學家解釋加密貨幣的兩種未來 |泰勒·考恩

- All right.

So now let's move on to cryptocurrency.

You need to drink water or anything before we switch topics?

- Let's try crypto without water-

but we'll see.

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Crypto.'

- 'Cryptocurrency becomes more popular,

we're starting to see signs ||||Zeichen

that it could become part of our financial future.'

- Cryptocurrency is a truly new idea, Kryptowährung|||wirklich||

and it's rare that we have truly, fundamentally new ideas.

Think of Bitcoin as a kind of recordkeeping system, |||||||Aufzeichnungssystem|

and you pay people in Bitcoin to validate the records, |||||||validieren||Aufzeichnungen

and you move on to the next day

and every day, every moment, you have a new set of records- |||||||||Satz||

and this process is self-enforcing. ||||selbst|durchsetzbar

It cannot easily be overruled ||||außer Kraft gesetzt

by an outside authority or central authority.

So it's like you have, at the same time,

potentially a new kind of money,

a new kind of investment asset, |||||Vermögenswert

and also, actually, a new kind of computer.

So when I talk to people who are deeply into crypto,

I often feel quite skeptical.

They have such bold, grand plans,

and I'm not convinced they've thought through

how to carry it all out. wie|zu|durchführen|||

At the same time, I know many people

who dismiss crypto altogether. |||ganz und gar

They think it's a scam or a bubble or a fraud. ||||||||||Betrug

And when I talk to them, I feel quite bullish about crypto. |||||||||optimistisch||

I see a lot of potential in the ideas,

but I don't think we know yet how useful crypto will be.

Here are some reasons why the crypto-skeptics are skeptical:

People use crypto to pay off ransoms. ||||||Lösegeld

Let's say hackers will go

into the medical records of a hospital,

pull out or lock or freeze that information,

and they won't give it back

until they're paid off in crypto.

You can't ever get your money back.

It's an irreversible transaction done on the blockchain. ||irreversibel|||||Blockchain-Technologie

That's the end of it.

Crypto itself, in most of its current forms,

it consumes a lot of energy.

You have computers racing to make calculations

to crack different kinds of cryptographic problems.

And those computers use so much energy

that it damages the environment through carbon emissions

in a way that we understand pretty well now.

But maybe the biggest reason to be crypto-skeptical

is simply that a lot of the promised benefits ||||||||Vorteile

haven't happened yet.

"Well, it's gonna make banking cheaper."

"It's gonna make finance cheaper."

"It's gonna make lending cheaper." |||Kredite vergeben|

Maybe those dreams are just impossible,

or impossible anytime soon.

And if people are skeptical

about the promised benefits of crypto,

they have some good reasons to be skeptical.

Here's a way to think about 'the bullish case' for crypto:

Imagine that the internet

becomes more and more its own economy

with its own series of rules,

and that economy is a global one.

It will need its own systems of recordkeeping,

its own systems of property rights,

its own way of consummating transactions. ||||vollziehend|

We'll need a new institution to do all those things,

and crypto is actually the best bet that we have. ||||||Wette|||

If that occurs, and many people think it will,

it probably would be possible for me,

say, to take part of my checking account

and just by sending a single message,

lend some of it out to say, farmers in Kenya. verleihen|||||||||

The world would be more global.

I would be better off. They would be better off.

There'd be this new system, some call it the 'Metaverse,' |||||||||Metaversum

others just call it the 'expanded internet,'

where we would own more things on the internet,

have these secure property rights ||sichere|Eigentum|

validated by the blockchain,

have new investment assets,

and moving resources around the world

would be much easier, cheaper.

That is speculative, ||spekulativ

but it is not what I would call "crazy speculative."

It's a possibility,

and we're going to see if that's what's going to happen.