×

Usamos cookies para ayudar a mejorar LingQ. Al visitar este sitio, aceptas nuestras politicas de cookie.

image

History, Easter Island - Where Giants Walked .

Easter Island - Where Giants Walked .

In the early 18th century, a Dutch explorer named Admiral Jacob Roggeveen

was sailing across the vast blue expanse of the South Pacific Ocean. He had been

on the sea for 17 days, searching the southern ocean for a mythical continent

known as Terra Australis. And when he saw a small island on the horizon, his heart

must have skipped a beat, as Roggeveen recounts in his diary.

There was a great rejoicing among the people and everyone hoped that this low

land might prove to be a foretoken of the unknown southern continent. But as

their ships approached, it became clear that this was no vast continent, only a

small island, a dot of land in the middle of the ocean. Nevertheless, Roggeveen

was curious and he ordered his three ships to prepare for landing. It was

Easter Day, 1722. As the Dutch got closer, it became clear that the island ahead of

them was inhabited. They saw smoke rising from the villages along the coast,

but it was a seemingly barren land. We originally, from a further distance,

considered Easter Island to be sandy. The reasons for that is that we counted as

sand the withered grass, hay or other scorched and burnt vegetation, because

its wasted appearance could give no other impression than of a singular

As they sailed closer, the island's inhabitants came out on canoes to meet

them, greeting them with friendly astonishment. This was much like other

islands that Roggeveen had visited before, but when he got ashore, what he found on

this island amazed him. Along the beaches, lined up in rows with their backs to the

sea, was a line of stone statues. They were carved from black volcanic stone,

some of them standing 10 meters high, wearing crowns of red sandstone. But

Roggeveen and his men couldn't understand how these statues had got

there. The stone images at first caused us to be struck with astonishment, because

we couldn't comprehend how it was possible that these people, who were

devoid of heavy thick timber for making any machines, as well as strong ropes,

nevertheless had been able to erect such images which were fully 30 feet high and

thick in proportion. Roggeveen and his men didn't stay long. They soon set sail

away from the island and on across the Pacific. But the remarkable image stayed

with them and they must have asked themselves how did those people

construct so many vast stone statues when so little building material seemed

available to them? Why had they built so many? And if such an advanced civilization

had once lived on this island, where on earth had it vanished to?

My name is Paul Cooper and you're listening to the Fall of Civilizations

podcast. Each episode I look at a civilization of the past that rose to

glory and then collapsed into the ashes of history. I want to ask what did they

have in common? What led to their fall and what did it feel like to be a person

alive at the time who witnessed the end of their world? In this episode, I want to

tell the story of one of archaeology's most enduring puzzles, the mystery of

Easter Island. I want to explore why it's not actually much of a mystery at all. I

want to examine how this unique community grew up in complete isolation,

how it survived the test of centuries against overwhelming odds, and I want to

take you through the evidence about what happened to finally bring this society

and its enormous statues crashing down.

The Pacific Ocean is the largest and deepest of Earth's oceans. At over 165

million square kilometers, it covers one-third of the Earth's total surface.

It's so vast that if you were to look at Earth from outer space, it's just about

possible to position yourself so that only the Pacific Ocean is visible and

you could imagine that you were looking at a planet completely composed of water.

But the Pacific is not an unbroken sea. Across its blue expanse, there are over

25,000 islands of varying size, many of them thrown up by volcanic eruptions

that burst from the lively tectonics of the Pacific Plate. Easter Island is at

the eastern corner of an area we call the Polynesian Triangle, a vast region of

the Pacific Ocean broken by over a thousand volcanic islands. Easter

Island itself is a loosely triangular shape too, made up of three extinct

volcanoes at each of its points. The largest of these volcanoes is called

Terevaka. It's a young volcano bursting out of the sea less than 400,000 years

ago, its lava gushing out and raising a peak that looms half a kilometer above

the ocean. When it first erupted, Terevaka's lava pooled so that it joined

up two older volcanoes on either side of it and the landmass that today we call

Easter Island was born. The people who have lived on Easter Island for centuries

call it by the name Te Pito o Te Henua, which translates literally to the center

of the world. Other names for it are translated as the land's end or fragment

of the earth, and today's Polynesians call the island Rapa Nui. Rapa Nui is a

small island, only about 24 kilometers end-to-end and 12 kilometers wide, and

it's one of the most remote and isolated places on earth. From the coast of Easter

Island, it would take 3,200 kilometers to reach the nearest continent of South

America, about the distance from Paris to Damascus, and even the nearest inhabited

island is over 2,000 kilometers away.

The Polynesians who first settled the island arrived from the West. Sometime

before the year 3000 BC, they had left the mainland of the Asian continent, and

since that time, these hardy sailors had perfected their craft until they were

the most successful ocean-going settlers in history. They built large

sturdy canoes with two hulls, in fact, effectively two canoes joined by a deck

and with two masts with sails. The catamaran design of these ships was

incredibly sophisticated, and in fact, they look like a modern sailing boat

used for racing. They were both stable and fast, and they allowed the Polynesians

to gradually settle the entire Pacific Ocean. These early settlers navigated the

oceans without any physical navigation devices. They knew the stars well enough

that they could make astonishing calculations about latitude and

longitude using only the night sky, and they didn't write this detailed

knowledge down, but used only songs and stories to memorize the properties and

positions of the stars, islands, and known sea routes. The Polynesians also used the

natural world as an aid to their navigation. They followed the flight

paths of seabirds like the black tern, and this ancient Polynesian sailors' song

shows the significance of these birds. The black tern, the black tern is my bird,

bird in whom my eyes are gifted with unbounded vision. These epic voyages were

all the more impressive because the winds in the South Pacific blow westwards

against the direction of the Polynesians' expansion. To travel these vast distances

against the winds, the explorers developed a sailing technique known as

tacking, where the craft zigzags against a prevailing wind in order to catch some

forward motion. And storms in the Pacific could be deadly to these early

explorers. It's been recorded that when a severe typhoon struck, these sailors had

a method of surviving that seems unthinkable to a modern sailor. They

would actually purposefully flood the hulls of their canoes, and because the

wooden hulls provided enough flotation, the ship would stay afloat. But with most

of its body submerged, it would survive being bufted about in the gale-force

winds. While the storm went on, the sailors would climb inside their

flooded hulls, keeping their heads above water, and wait for the winds to pass.

There has long been a debate about when exactly these intrepid Polynesian

adventurers arrived on Easter Island. It was long assumed that they had arrived

sometime in the fourth or fifth centuries, but studies of the islanders

language and radiocarbon dating recently revised that estimate to somewhere

around the 8th century, and even more modern analysis has pushed that date

forward even further. Many scientists today believe that Rapa Nui wasn't

settled until sometime around the year 1200 AD. At this time around the world,

the Mongol armies of Genghis Khan were finalizing their conquests of northern

China. The notorious Fourth Crusade, headed for Jerusalem, instead sacked and

burned the Christian capital of Constantinople. An exotic import from

Arabia called sugar was mentioned for the first time in an English text. On

the other side of the world, in the middle of the vast expanse of the

Pacific, a small band of Polynesian sailors landed their boats on the shores

of a new land.

An ancient piece of Rapa Nui folklore credits the settlement of the island to

a Polynesian king called Hotu Matua.

In Heva, Haumaka had a dream in which his spirit traveled to a far country,

looking for a new home for his king Hotu. His spirit arrived at three small

islands, and another with a larger one with a crater on the southwest corner.

The island was the eighth or last island in the dim twilight of the rising sun.

The spirit traveled counterclockwise around the island, naming 28 places,

including Anakena, a landing place on the north coast of the island and future

residence of the king. When Haumaka awoke, he told his brother Huatava about the

dream. After hearing about the dream, Hotu Matua ordered Haumaka to send some

young men to explore the island. Hotu Matua told his two sons to build a canoe

and search for the island of Haumaka's dream. So the seven men left in a canoe,

stocked with yams, sweet potatoes, bananas and other foods. They left on the

25th day of April and arrived on the first day of June, a voyage of five weeks.

These settlers brought everything that was required for the traditional

Polynesian lifestyle. They brought their most crucial foods, bananas, a root

vegetable called taro with broad elephant ear leaves, as well as sweet

potatoes and sugar cane. They also brought saplings of the paper mulberry

tree, the fibers of which they used to weave clothes. They brought animals

with them too, although only those small enough to be transported. They brought

chickens and also the Polynesian rat, which was an everyday food for common

people. This was an entire ecological system in waiting, packed up in the

hulls of their canoes, optimized for transport and ready to be transplanted

to a new land. Hotu Matua may not have realized it, but his arrival on Easter

Island was of profound significance, not just for him and his people, but for all

of mankind. That's because Easter Island was the final stop on a journey of

60,000 years that had taken mankind out of Africa, through Asia and onto the

Americas. The final chapter of this journey was the gradual colonization of

the Polynesian islands, and Easter Island was the furthest and final piece of

uninhabited land. Mankind's journey out of Africa ended on the shores of Easter

Island, and with that step, a new phase of humanity's history began. I think it's

worth noting at this point that apart from the evidence we can find in the

archaeological record, we have essentially two sources of information

about the history of Easter Island, and each of them has their problems. Firstly,

there are the accounts of European visitors to the island, like the Dutchman

Roggeveen. These accounts come down to us either in the form of ships' logs or in

the form of memoirs written down when these explorers returned to their

homelands. The biggest problem for researchers of Rapa Nui's history is

that these early visitors to the island left behind accounts that are extremely

limited in their content and their reliability, and that sometimes directly

contradict each other. Most of them stayed for only a few days, they rarely

wandered far from their landing spot, and they commented little on the culture,

language, or society of the islanders. In the debate that has raged over what

happened on Easter Island, many writers have tried to use a selective reading of

these accounts in order to support their own favoured argument, and that's

something we should be very careful about as we go forward and assess the

evidence. But these written records do provide us with some useful information.

At times, as you'll see, they give us fixed points in time around which we can

build our story. The second source of information is the oral folklore of the

islanders themselves. This was passed down by word of mouth through the

generations, often in the form of songs and stories, and this can give us a

wonderful sense of how the islanders view their own history and their own

sense of identity. But this source of information can also be very difficult

to rely on when trying to sort historical fact from fiction. The

different strands of the island's folklore is also often extremely

contradictory, and the reason for that isn't hard to imagine. Detailed

observations of these songs and stories weren't written down until the 1880s, and

by that time, the culture of Rapa Nui had already undergone drastic change. By this

point, they had been in contact with the outside world for more than a hundred

and fifty years, and their population was reduced to a tiny fraction of what it

had once been. Now, only a few survivors pass down the stories they remembered,

and to add another level of confusion, these stories were written down by early

European explorers who may have mistranslated as well as added and

embellished elements that didn't exist in the original. One example of this is

the question of the name of the island's first king, who we've already mentioned,

Hotu Matua. But his name is so similar to the folk hero of another nearby island,

Mangareva, that some researchers have questioned whether this name isn't a

foreign import to Easter Island. If we can't trust this important detail to

have been faithfully transmitted, perhaps we can't be too sure about the rest. These

stories, refracted through these various mirrors, are now connected to the true

facts of the distant past by only the most fragile of threads. This is all to

make it very clear to you that the history of Easter Island is not even

close to being a settled matter, and it often relies on fragmentary and

contradictory evidence. Today, new research has begun to challenge the

familiar narrative we've all grown up with, and we will have to deal with a lot

of uncertainty as we forge ahead through the tragic story of this most remarkable

island. According to tradition, the first Polynesian settlers arrived on Easter

Island at a point called Anakena, a white coral sand beach on the north of the

island that forms a natural harbour. It's worth mentioning that the

landscape these first settlers would have seen was very different to the one

we see today on Rapa Nui. The bare grassy slopes first spied by Roggeveen in the

18th century and which we know from images today, would have been nowhere to

be seen. In fact, they would have been covered by a thick forest of tropical

palm trees. If you dig down into the earth of Easter Island today, you can

still see the hollow molds left by the roots of these trees. Studies of these

root molds as well as pollen analysis shows that when humans arrived on Rapa

Nui, the island was home to over 21 species of trees. Some of these were

large, including at least three which grew up to 15 meters or more. One species

of palm tree, the Easter Island or Rapa Nui palm, may even have been among the

largest species of palm tree in the world. This now extinct tree, known as

Pascalococcus, seems to have once been the most numerous species on the island

and its closest relative today, Jubaea chilensis or the Chilean wine palm, can

reach heights of over 25 meters, its bulbous trunk the thickest in the world,

reaching a diameter of more than a meter. The soil of Easter Island has never been

rich but the forest would have provided a small amount of food for the new

settlers, palm nuts and fruits too, along with the birds in the trees that could

be trapped. Luckily for archaeologists, the sand of Anakena Beach, the site of

that first settlement, is particularly good at preserving bone and human

remains. Because of this, skeletons examined here have given scientists

insight into the lives of the ancient Rapa Nui. Studies have shown that as well

as these plant crops, people supplemented their diet with a mix of marine animals,

including dolphins they trapped in the Bay of Anakena, seals, sea turtles, and

fish that they caught with hooks carved from bone. In fact, bone chemistry

analysis has shown that the people here got about half of their diet from the

sea. They cooked all of these foods in earth ovens known as umu, cavities dug

into the ground which then had burning grass and leaves placed on top of them

so the heat radiated downwards. These people were ingenious and inherited

knowledge from their ancestors. They made textiles from the fibers of the paper

mulberry tree and spun rope from a tree known as the how tree. With this

healthy and diverse mix of foodstuffs and resources, their settlement became

incredibly successful. From there, using slash-and-burn agricultural methods, the

original settlers spread quickly across the small landmass of the island and

they soon began to clear the forest in order to plant their crops, until the

whole of Rapa Nui was fully populated with around 3,000 people. Slowly, that

primeval palm forest began to disappear from Easter Island.

I think at this point, it's worth running you through that traditional story of

what happened on Easter Island. It has been the dominant narrative about this

island for decades, perhaps even centuries. It was begun by early European

explorers, propagated by Victorian and 20th century anthropologists, and finally

popularized by authors like the popular science writer Jared Diamond. You

might find it familiar. In this narrative, the inhabitants of Easter Island were

the architects of their own demise. The story goes that their population boomed

until the island could no longer support it. They cut down their trees to use as

firewood for construction material and to use as rollers to transport their

enormous statues. The loss of trees on the island resulted in an ecological

collapse that destroyed the fertility of the soil and the productive potential of

the island fell apart. Along with the collapse of the island's ecology, the

complex and centralized society that had built the hundreds of stone statues on

the coast began to collapse too. Resources became scarce, starvation ran

rampant and this led to a period of violent civil war. Shortly before the

arrival of the Europeans in 1722, the whole of Rapa Nui society had come apart

and only a few thousand survivors were left. Jared Diamond, perhaps the greatest

champion of this theory today, puts it bluntly. In just a few centuries, the

people of Easter Island wiped out their forests, drove their plants and animals

to extinction and saw their complex society spiral into chaos.

This story has a widespread appeal for a number of reasons. In the latter half of

the 20th century, as we became increasingly concerned about our own

society's destructive impact on our environment, the story of Easter Island

became irresistible as an example of the fate that might befall us if we fail to

respect the environment around us. The stone statues too have proved

irresistible as emblems of human folly, our desire to always build bigger and

better than our neighbors. In his book, Jared Diamond even makes the comparison

to his neighbors in Hollywood building ever bigger and better mansions in an

effort to prove their status. The islanders were so obsessed with these

statues, the narrative goes, that they cut down all their trees to transport them.

This single-minded obsession drove them to starvation, then cannibalism and

finally to the edge of extinction. But there are a number of problems with this

narrative, a number of seriously questionable assumptions and over the

course of this episode, I'm going to try to unpick three of the most glaring of

these assumptions so that you can assess the evidence for yourself. Firstly,

there's the assumption that the Easter Islanders deforested their island due to

greed, overpopulation, or even a maniacal obsession with statue building. Secondly,

there's the assumption that the loss of the forest led to a societal collapse.

Thirdly, there's the assumption that Easter Island society collapsed at all,

at least before contact with the outside world. As we'll see, each of these

assumptions has significant problems and once we've dealt with them, we can get

down to what actually happened to decimate the islanders of Rapa Nui, to

strip the island of its plant life and to leave those famous stone statues

moldering on the lone grassy hills of Easter Island.

Virtually as soon as they arrived on the island, probably around the year 1200, the

islanders began carving the monuments that would one day make them famous

around the world. Stone statues are common on islands across the Polynesian

world but no other island can compete with the size of the Easter Island

statues or with the incredible number carved. These statues are called moai. The

moai are known for their large, broad noses and strong chins, along with

rectangle-shaped ears and deep eye slits. For the Easter Islanders, these statues

were what they called a ringa ora ata te puna, that is, the living faces of the

holy ancestors. These are stone representations of the islanders that

have gone before. Of the moai that were successfully moved into place, the vast

majority stand on the coast of the island on monolithic stone platforms

called ahu. While most people's eyes are drawn by the statues, these ahu are

themselves impressive undertakings. They are built of enormous stones cut so

precisely that they fit together in a perfect jigsaw, with not even enough room

to fit a razor blade between the stones. The largest of them, ahu Tongariki, holds

15 moai lined up in perfect order. Nearly all moai stand with their backs to the

sea, staring inland over the fields and hills of Rapa Nui with their deep,

expressive eyes. Almost all of the statues are carved from a volcanic stone

known as tuff. Tuff is formed when ash from a volcanic eruption falls thickly

on the ground and is then slowly compacted into solid rock. Tuff is

relatively soft and easy to carve, so it has been used for construction since

ancient times. It commonly occurs in Italy, for instance, and the Romans often

used it in their buildings. Most of the moai statues were carved in a quarry on

the outer cliff edge of the Rano Raraku crater. This quarry is an eerie sight

today. Here and there, the faces of half-finished giants still peer out of

the stone. The Rano Raraku crater is 700 meters across, formed of ash and

volcanic tuff thrown up in an ancient explosion and rings by cliffs 160 meters

high. The wide volcanic bowl is one of the three places on Easter Island where

fresh water pools to form a lake. Here, a kind of bulrushes called totora grow on

the water's edge, nodding in the breeze, and the Rapa Nui people once collected

them to weave thatched roofs for their houses. But it's on the outer slopes of

the crater's cliffs that the truly important activity took place. Here, the

islanders chipped their statues directly from the bedrock, using a kind of stone

chisel known as a toki that was made of dense basalt, perfectly suited for

carving the softer volcanic tuff. This would have been incredibly slow work.

Work that might take a modern craftsman with a steel chisel one hour might take

an Easter Islander with a stone toki a whole day or two days to complete. And

although estimates vary, it's thought that an entire statue could take over a

year for a team of 12 people to carve.

One fascinating aspect of this quarry is that there are a huge number of

incomplete Moai abandoned here, 397 in total. That's nearly half of the island's

total population of 887, and this shows just how difficult the carving of these

statues was. These abandoned Moai have been discarded for different reasons,

some more obvious than others. On some statues, it's clear that the workmen

discovered a seam of hard rock somewhere on the Moai's body, which would have been

virtually impossible to carve with their stone tools. Others have obvious flaws or

cracks in them, while some Moai have fallen over while raising them. Other

Moai simply seem to have been too ambitious in size. The largest of these,

nicknamed El Gigante, is nearly 22 meters in height. That's twice the height of a

telephone pole or the size of a six-story building. El Gigante, still

lying on his back in the cliff face, is almost twice the size of any Moai ever

completed. This enormous statue would have weighed an estimated 270 tons and

it's hard to imagine how the islanders ever intended to move it. We might

imagine an ambitious ancient craftsman overseeing the carving of this vast

statue, determined to create the largest Moai that the island has ever seen. Or

perhaps, as we'll find out later, the islanders believed they had to summon a

truly enormous protective spirit to defend their island against a threat. To

get a sense for how these people must have felt about these statues, let's

imagine ourselves into the role of a team of Moai carvers during the golden

age of Rapa Nui statue carving. The work would have been slow and painstaking, but

it would also have carried a great deal of responsibility. While you were carving

a Moai, you weren't working in the fields and so your community was

investing in your work. There must have been a lot of pride tied up in the

creation of these statues too. Before the carving could even begin, there would

likely have been ceremonies and rites that had to take place, chants and

incantations designed to summon the protective spirit of the ancestor to

inhabit the stone. There's an apocryphal quote often attributed to the sculptor

Michelangelo. Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of

the sculptor to discover it. Whether or not he actually said this, this must have

been something like what the people of Rapa Nui felt as the months passed and

the great statue, its head and arms and body, slowly materialized from the cliff

face in front of them.

The days would have been hard. Many traditional Rapa Nui working songs

survive today and we can imagine the workers singing while they chipped away

at the cliff. One surviving folk song even derives its rhythm from the

striking together of two stones, emulating the sounds of the toki tools

napping away at the statue. Here it is, recorded especially for this podcast by

children from the Toki School of Music on Easter Island. The workers' hands must

have been covered in the blackish dust of the stone and they would take breaks

to eat meals of sweet potato and taro, along with the chicken baked white in

earth ovens nearby. After much arduous work, the whole outline of the Moai would

be carved out. They would then deepen the cuts and hollow out the cliff behind the

statue too, clambering into the narrow space and lying on their bellies as they

carved. But even with the back carved out, the statue would still be attached to

the bedrock below with a narrow keel that ran the length of its spine. And so,

the final and most painstaking stage of the process would begin. They would

gather up stones and earth in order to support the Moai so that it didn't fall

and then this spine of stone would slowly be chipped away. It must have been

an incredible moment when that last stone umbilical cord was cut. It was the

culmination of so much time and sweat of course, but it must have sent shivers

down their spines too, as the great statue of their ancestor broke free of

its stony slumber and was finally filled with a living spirit. It's likely that

more ceremonies surrounded this moment, the chanting of holy men who wore white

plugs in their ears and the beating of drums. Over what must have been days, the

Moai was edged clear of its quarry resting place, with huge teams of workers

pulling ropes spun from the how tree. When the statue was clear, they slid it

down the grassy slope of the volcano so that it could be stood upright at the

bottom of the slope. This was one of the most dangerous parts of the Moai's

journey, as the great number of cracked and abandoned statues on the slope below

the quarry shows us. They look like an army of stony wanderers marching down

from the volcano. Somewhat ironically, these abandoned statues, buried up to

their necks in the refuse from the quarry, form some of the most iconic

images of Easter Island today, more familiar to the layman than the

completed ones that stand on the Ahu platforms on the coast. This is why

people talk about the stone heads of Easter Island, ignoring the fact that

most of the Moai have bodies. At the bottom of the hill, the workmen would

raise the Moai up to a standing position so they could finish carving the details

on its back, using soft pumice to wear it smooth, and then they would prepare to

transport the statue into its final resting place on its Ahu. The carvers

could wipe the sweat from their foreheads and share congratulations, but

this was just the beginning of another long and arduous chapter in the Moai's

journey. At this point, I think it's worth noting that we don't actually know for

sure how the ancient islanders moved these vast statues. This question was

something that obsessed early visitors to the island. They looked around at the

seemingly barren landscape of Rapa Nui, at its grassy slopes seemingly devoid of

large trees, and asked how a people without metal tools, pulleys, or wheels

could transport nearly 500 of these vast statues. The largest successfully

transported Moai, nicknamed Paro, was 10 meters tall which is longer than a

London bus. It's estimated that this statue weighed about 82 tons, heavier

than a Boeing 737 aircraft when fully loaded with passengers and fuel. The

ancient islanders would sometimes transport these statues for distances of

20 kilometers across the island's rough, undulating terrain. It's a question that

has been asked of the islanders since Europeans first arrived. How did your

ancestors move these statues? And for a long time, the islanders would always

give the same reply. They would simply say they walked. Foreign visitors would

always roll their eyes at this answer. They assumed this must be a piece of

local folklore, a kind of magical thinking that imagined the statues to be

the living spirits of the ancestors. Some may even have thought that the Rapa Nui

were making fun of them, but researchers today have discovered that there may be

more truth to this legend than it seems. Early archaeologists believed that the

Rapa Nui moved the great stone statues into place using logs as rollers. In 1998,

archaeologist Joanne van Tilburg successfully tested this theory using a

large number of hardwood rollers to transport a statue for a short distance.

But recent research has cast doubt on this theory and proposed an incredible

alternate possibility, and the key to discovering how the statues were

actually moved lies in the ones that never made it to their intended

locations.

Littered across Easter Island are the sad shapes of statues that broke during

their transportation. Only about a fifth of the Moai ever carved would reach

their destination on the Ahu platforms, and these total about 200. The rest, some

700 more, were either abandoned in the quarry or along the roads. Stone heads

are cracked from bodies, decapitated statues lie moldering and moss-covered

in the long grass. For the ancient islanders, this must have been a

heart-rending sight. A whole team had worked for a year or more, then

successfully slid this statue down the slope of the volcano. Then, somewhere

its journey, it had cracked and the broken statue would have to be abandoned

by the side of the road. These so-called road Moai have a number of interesting

features. For instance, we know that the islanders waited to carve the eyes of

the Moai until the statues were in place on their platforms. This may have had a

ceremonial purpose which has parallels around the world. For instance, in Sri

Lanka, when new statues of the Buddha are built, the eyes are always the last part

to be painted and only the painter is allowed in the shrine room while doing

their work. But a team of archaeologists led by Terry Hunt and Carl Lipo also

found something else interesting about these abandoned statues. They noticed

that when abandoned road Moai were found on uphill paths, they usually lay on

their backs and when the cracked statues were abandoned on downhill

paths, they usually lay on their fronts. On flat ground, it was more like 50-50.

And so, a theory began to emerge. Is it possible that the statues were

transported upright? Once this detail had been noticed, other details about the

road Moai seemed to fall into place. For instance, the road Moai had bulkier, lower

halves and rounder bellies. This had puzzled archaeologists for a long time

but Hunt and Lipo's theory seemed to make sense of this. The islanders were

designing the Moai in two phases. In the first, the transportation phase, the Moai

were bottom-heavy like a bowling pin and once it had been rocked into place on

its platform, it was then carved into its more slender and elegant final shape.

And so, Lipo and Hunt proposed that the statues were rocked back and forth by

teams of islanders with ropes, so that the statues actually seemed to walk over

the ground. Their team caused an international sensation when they were

able to successfully walk a scale model of a Moai cast in concrete, rocking it

back and forth along the road with three teams holding ropes. In this way,

the statue could literally walk down the path, just as the ancient folklore

recounted. The team managed to move the statue at a rate of about a hundred

meters in an hour, meaning it could have walked around a kilometer in a day.

If this is indeed how the statues were moved, it must have been an incredible sight to see.

The tallest Moai weighed over 80 tons and each one of the statues'

footsteps would have thundered on the earth, so that it really seemed like a

giant was stamping its way towards the platform. There would have likely been a

huge amount of ceremonial activity around the walking of these statues too,

people coming from all over the island to watch, singing and dancing and all

kinds of activity. For the days and weeks it took to transport one of these

statues, it would have really felt like a god had come down to earth. I love the

romance and imagination behind Lipo and Hunt's theory and I think they build a

convincing case that this was indeed how the statues were moved. But you might ask,

well, why does it matter how the statues were moved? Isn't this a minor detail of

the story of this society's collapse? Well, actually, this question has come to

take on an enormous significance for the mystery of what happened on Easter

Island. The traditional narrative, if you remember, was that the Rapa Nui Islanders

became so obsessed with building their statues that they destroyed their

environment to do so. The islanders cut down all their trees, the theory says, in

order to use as scaffolds and rollers to transport them. If this was the case, then

each statue must have taken hundreds, if not thousands, of trees to transport and

this seemed the obvious answer to why the island was so deforested, why its

ecology collapsed and its society followed. But if Lipo and Hunt were

correct and the statues were walked into place, then very little wood was

needed and the whole narrative of the Moai causing the collapse of the

island's ecology comes into question. So, the whole mystery of Easter Island

seems to hinge on this question of whether the statues rolled or whether

they walked. So, what do we know about the loss of trees on Easter Island? One thing

we can say for sure, the subtropical palm forest that the first settlers found on

the island wouldn't long survive the arrival of humans. One of the earliest

casualties of this deforestation was the largest of the island's trees, the Rapa

Nui palm. If we want to guess at how this enormous tree grew, we can look at

its closest surviving relative, the Chilean wine palm. This tree takes 50

years to reach its full height and until then it doesn't produce a single fruit.

This slow-growing and slow-reproducing tree would have been one of the most

affected by the arrival of humans. Some theorists, Jared Diamond included, have

argued that the Easter Island palm would have been in high demand for use

as rollers to transport the giant Moai across the island, but experiments have

found that the palm would have been exceptionally badly suited for this job.

The hard outer shell of the palm trunk conceals a soft center that would have

been instantly crushed beneath the heavy stone statues. Diamond has even argued

that the palm may have been cut down in order to build large canoes, but nowhere

else in Polynesia are canoes built from palm trunks and they would be very

unsuitable for this purpose. So, what did happen to Easter Island's trees? Well,

undoubtedly, much of the forest was cut down by humans, but they didn't do this

unconsciously or foolishly. They did it for the same reason that people in

Iceland or England cut down their forests, because they were farmers. The

Rapa Nui, like all Polynesians, farmed energy-rich foods like sweet potatoes,

taro, and sugar cane. These abundant foods were vastly more productive than whatever

food they could have gathered from the forest. So, much of this deforestation was

controlled and conscious and actually improved the quality of these people's

lives. But that isn't to say there wasn't an ecological collapse on Easter Island.

Pollen analysis shows that virtually all large trees were lost from the island

within a matter of centuries, and by far the largest factor appears to have been

something very small. That's one of the animal companions that the original

settlers brought with them, the Polynesian rat. Wherever these Pacific

explorers went, they brought animals with them. Each Polynesian island got

some combination of these four animals, pigs, dogs, chickens, and rats. On Rapa Nui,

only rats and chickens were introduced. Some argued that these rats may have

stowed away on the canoes, just as they do on larger vessels, but rat has

actually been a foodstuff that Polynesians have relied on throughout

history. It was never a delicacy and seems to have been considered a food of

the common people, as rat bones are rarely found in the rubbish dumps of

high-status houses. However, they were a good and reliable source of protein on

long voyages. I can't speak to personal experience, but accounts I've read say

that rat tastes oily and gamey, a little like rabbit. Another advantage to

this source of food is that rats reproduce incredibly quickly. Once the

Polynesian rat was introduced to Easter Island, its spread would have been

unstoppable. The millions of giant palm trees covering the island would have

provided them with an almost unlimited supply of their favorite food, palm nuts.

Recent lab studies have shown that the reproductive potential of rats under

these ideal conditions can be enormous. In fact, the rat population could have

doubled every 47 days until they reached a population of up to 3 million and the

island was completely overrun. The rats would have quickly eaten the seeds and

palm nuts from the trees, preventing the forest from regenerating. In Anakena

Beach and certain caves, archaeologists have found the earliest remnants of

palm nut shells, showing the tooth marks of rats. As well as damaging the forests,

rats would also have eaten the eggs of seabirds, finishing off those the

islanders hadn't trapped and eaten. And since the seabirds fertilized the soil

with their droppings, this would have spelled disaster for the biodiversity of

Easter Island. But the question is, did this loss of trees cause a societal

collapse on Rapa Nui? The answer to that question is almost certainly not.

This isn't to say that the loss of palm forests on Rapa Nui didn't present a

number of challenges to the islanders. By around the year 1650, pollen studies

show that the deforestation of Easter Island was complete. Without tree cover,

the ocean winds could now blow right across the island. The wind and storms

threatened to blow away the topsoil and salt spray from the sea effectively

salted the earth in coastal regions, damaging the soil further. But in all

cases, the Rapa Nui islanders reacted to these challenges with ingenuity and

creativity. They transformed their island not into a desolate wasteland, but into

an astonishingly effective system of gardens, orchards and farmland. In fact,

archaeologists have found evidence of areas of the island where the islanders

planted groves of palm trees and cultivated them. Around this time, they

also began farming using a technique known as rock mulching. This involved

laying rock beds around the island which prevented the soil from washing or

blowing away. It also reduced the amount of water evaporated by the Sun and

increased the amount of nutrients available to growing plants as the

rainwater flowed over the rocks and carried minerals to their roots. Rock

mulching has been used by cultures around the world who live in harsh,

water-poor environments. It's been observed in the Negev Desert in Israel,

the pebbled fields of Lanzhou in China, the ash fields of the Canary Islands and

the fields of the Anasazi culture in New Mexico. The Rapa Nui set about the

task of rock mulching with the same great energy that they used to carve and

transport the Moai. They would ultimately cover half the landmass of their island

in rock gardens of this kind. It was an enormous task. It's been calculated that

over the 400 years that the practice was engaged in, it would have taken over 150

men working daily to construct these vast assemblages made up of billions of

stones. There's strong evidence that the Rapa Nui people also took advantage

of the deep underground caverns of the island.

The caves of Easter Island were formed by lava tubes which developed during the volcanic eruptions that

raised the islands out of the sea. When lava flows out of the mouth of a volcano,

it forms vast underground rivers as the lava on the surface cools and hardens

into rock. When the eruption ends and the lava stops flowing, the tubes drain their

lava, leaving enormous caverns that look as though a monstrous worm has eaten its

way through the rock. These tubes are as wide as a subway tunnel and Easter Island

has one of the largest systems of volcanic caves in the world. The

islanders' relationship with these caves goes back to the first known moment of

their history, as this piece of Rapa Nui folklore about King Hotu Matua shows.

The explorers went to the west side of the island and discovered a surfing spot.

They rode a wave to the right and called the place where they landed Hanga Roa.

They rode a wave to the left and landed at Apina Iti. They caught more waves, then

went ashore and rested in a cave at Pupaka Kina. Some of these caves can

stretch for three or four kilometers into the island's rock. As the forests

of Rapa Nui retreated, its people increasingly turned to these caves to

provide cover for their crops. They cultivated vast underground gardens

where they could grow sweet potatoes and yams to supplement their diet. They also

constructed circular rock walls called manavai that could be as much as six

feet tall and where they could grow a variety of crops. These kept plants safe

from the destructive elements of the weather, reduced the amount of water

runoff and concentrated nutrients. Archaeologists have identified over 2,500

of these rock gardens around the island, but this is likely only a fraction of

the original number. Studies have shown that even today, with no active

maintenance being done on them, these rings of rock are still operating as

designed by the ancient gardeners. Levels of phosphorus and potassium, crucial

minerals for plants, are much higher inside the manavai than outside, with the

concentrations being sometimes two or three times as high. Simply put, with

their rock gardening techniques, the Rapa Nui were able to make the land much

more productive after the forest was cleared than it was before. Some of this

great agricultural potential is hinted at in the accounts of the first Dutch

sailors to land on the island, although I will once again caution about trusting

too much in these accounts. Although Roggeveen believed Rapa Nui to be a

treeless, sandy wasteland from a distance, when he actually landed on the island, he

was surprised to find it a productive landscape. We found it not only not sandy,

on the contrary, exceedingly fruitful, producing bananas, potatoes, sugarcane of

remarkable thickness, many other kinds of the fruits of the earth. This place, as

far as its rich soil and good climate are concerned, is such that it might be made

into an earthly paradise. Another of Roggeveen's officers, a man named Carl

Friedrich Behrens, seems also to contradict this account of a treeless

island, and reported on a wide variety of uses the islanders had for palm leaves.

They gave us palm branches as peace offerings. Their houses were set up on

wooden stakes, daubed over with luting and covered with palm leaves. In fact,

Behrens paints a remarkably positive impression of the island overall. This

island is a suitable and convenient place at which to obtain refreshment, as

all the country is under cultivation and we saw in the distance whole tracts of

woodland. And Roggeveen himself also witnessed cultivated groves of fruit

trees on the island. It was now deemed advisable to go to the other side of the

island, the principal place of their plantations and fruit trees, for all the

things they brought to us of that kind were fetched from that quarter.

So here, a relatively clear picture is beginning to emerge. We can say for sure

that the arrival of humans on Rapa Nui resulted in the disappearance of most of

its forest. But this is true of virtually every forested island on earth after the

arrival of people, and no one has yet been able to draw a clear causative link

between the loss of the forest on Rapa Nui and the collapse of so-called

complex society. In fact, studies done on the skeletons of islanders from around

this time showed that they suffered from less malnutrition than the average

European. This all seems to be backed up by Roggeveen's account of his first

visit to the island. It's clear from his account that when he arrived, the Rapa

Nui islanders weren't starving. They didn't make any attempt to beg for food

from the newcomers. In fact, they were much more interested in the Europeans'

hats, and one brave islander even climbed through a porthole on Roggeveen's ship to

steal a tablecloth. But there's no account of them stealing the Europeans'

food. In fact, it was the Dutch, malnutritioned on a diet of salt meat

and hard tack after weeks at sea, who begged the islanders for food, giving

them cloth and linen in exchange for 60 chickens and 30 bunches of bananas. None

of this sounds like the behavior of a people living on the edge of starvation.

With multiple abundant sources of food, alongside the efficient use of the land

around them, archaeological and written evidence begins to make that popular

scenario of starvation and even cannibalism look patently absurd.

Part and parcel of the starvation narrative is the assumption that the

society of the island descended into a period of brutal conflict once resources

ran scarce. But if resources were abundant, can we also question this

assumption? The folklore of the islanders does record a period of warfare, after

which the Moai building culture faded into obscurity. But as we've seen, this

folklore can be unreliable at the best of times. Much more reliable is the

archaeological record. When a period of conflict occurs in such an environment,

the evidence is usually hard to miss.

One great example of this is the island of Fiji, another Pacific island 7,000

kilometers away. In Fiji, archaeologists have found the remains of strong hilltop

forts and fortified towns, all pointing to a period of warfare. In Hawaii, it's

well documented that chiefs fought each other in large battles featuring

hundreds of warriors armed with clubs. The signs of war in the archaeological

record aren't difficult to spot. Increased number of weapons, increased

building of defensive structures, and skeletal remains that bear the marks of

violence. First, let's look at the evidence of weapons on Rapa Nui. The

islanders did make blades from the black volcanic glass obsidian. Obsidian forms

in the vents of volcanic eruptions when lava reaches the surface and cools

quickly, forming a glassy material that is brittle but has exceptionally sharp

edges. In fact, obsidian blades have been measured to be up to a thousand times

sharper than a steel scalpel. The Rapa Nui gave their blades names depending on

their shape. Fishtail, rat spine, banana leaf are some examples. Some writers have

argued that the large amount of these blades found points to a mass production

of weaponry and a period of conflict. But studies of these blades have found that

their edges were mostly covered in vegetable matter, that's sweet potato and

taro, and they were found in the highest concentrations in the area of the

islanders' rock gardens, where they were most likely used for everyday tasks like

the preparation of food. Studies of skeletons have also seemed to undermine

this picture of conflict. In a historical zone of conflict, we would expect to see

skeletons missing their heads, for instance, or skulls with arrowheads

inside, broken bones and bones bearing scratches from blades glancing off them.

But studies of skeletal remains on Easter Island have shown that the

islanders were in fact remarkable for their mostly peaceful existence. Only

around 2% of the skeletons studied have been found to have suffered trauma from

blunt and cutting weapons, and this isn't a large proportion of the population. I

do think here it's also worth remembering Behrens' observation that

the islanders were unarmed when they first came to meet the Dutch explorers.

In the search for defensive structures, archaeologists have also found

themselves frustrated. The small Pacific island of Rapaiti, for instance, is five

times smaller than Easter Island and yet it has no fewer than 14 hilltop

fortresses. On Rapaiti, life on the island actually did descend into a

nightmare of violence and civil war and the signs of this are hard to miss.

Fortifications on Rapaiti involve watchtowers and walls, ditches and wooden

palisade fences. We find weapons here and human remains bearing the marks of

violence, but on Easter Island no such fortifications exist. One feature known

as the Poika ditch was long assumed to be a defensive structure, but recent

investigations have shown that it's actually a natural feature caused by the

collision of two lava flows. Some walls built at the entrances to caves have

also been used as evidence of the islanders fortifying themselves, but

there's little other evidence of the caves being used as military strongholds

and in fact they seem to be more commonly used as hiding places. So

another one of our assumptions about Easter Island has been taken away. Now

we're left having to explain how Rapa Nui's culture could actually have been

less violent than many other comparable societies and certainly less violent

than any city of Europe at the time. We may never know what decides whether a

small community will descend into a violent hell like Rapaiti or whether

they will work together to maintain the peace like on Rapa Nui. Some have

suggested that the Rapa Nui islanders, all descended from that first

colonization attempt, would have had many family relations between tribes and so

it may have been unthinkable to escalate conflict beyond the occasional

feud or skirmish. When a rival chief is also the husband of your wife's sister's

aunt, for instance, you might try to avoid excessive conflict and reach for

peaceful compromises, that is, if you want to avoid a frosty atmosphere at your

dinner table. On a small island, word travels fast and it doesn't pay to be

viewed as overly aggressive. Some historians have even argued that the

construction of the Moai themselves may have helped prevent conflict by allowing

the island's different communities to compete for dominance in a non-violent

way. Another way this may have occurred is through an incredible ritual known

as the Birdman Competition.

The later history of the island is dominated by the cult of a mysterious

figure known as the Tangata Manu or the Birdman. Cave paintings on Easter Island

show this ceremonial figure with the body of a man but the head and wings of

a bird. Each year the men of Rapa Nui took part in a ceremony that allowed

them to become the human embodiment of this figure for the next year. It was a

test of strength and daring that is astonishing to even contemplate today.

The contestants who competed to become the Birdman had a simple enough task.

Off the southwest coast of Rapa Nui, there is a small cluster of islands and

one of these is a rocky outcrop known as Motonui, which is home to several

species of nesting birds. Among these is the black tern, which we've already seen

held a mystical significance for Polynesian sailors. These birds seem to

be gifted with a magical ability to lead sailors home and it's not hard to see

how they would have assumed a powerful religious significance. The Birdman

contest took place in the spring during the laying season of the black terns.

Young men who wanted to become that year's Birdman would have to swim out to

the rocky island of Motonui, a distance of about a kilometer through choppy seas

and powerful currents. Once they reached the island, they had to climb up through

the flocks of cackling seabirds and search through their nests, looking for

the first egg of the season. Sometimes they would have to wait there for days.

But when they found their precious prize, they had to swim all the way back

to Rapa Nui. Then, dripping with cold salt water, they had to climb the sheer

300-meter cliff. The first man to complete this incredible triathlon event

would be crowned the Birdman. It's unclear how much power this figure actually had,

but in terms of status, there was no higher honor. And allowing men to battle

it out in this test of strength every year may have played a role in reducing

the violence of the island. So on Easter Island, the evidence seems to suggest

that there was no starvation. There was no widespread warfare. And so you might

be left asking, did their society even collapse at all? And the answer to that

is yes, but not when you think it did.

For early European explorers, there was no greater mystery than what they called

the riddle of Easter Island. The French seafarer and artist Pierre Lotti wrote

about it in the 19th century. There exists in the midst of the great ocean

in a region where nobody goes, a mysterious and isolated island. The

island is planted with monstrous great statues, the work of I don't know what

race, today degenerate or vanished. Its great remains an enigma. We've actually

encountered this kind of thinking a number of times over the course of this

series. When European explorers discovered the ruins of past

civilizations, they often found it hard to believe that so-called primitive

people had a hand in their construction. Whether it's assuming that the ruins of

Angkor were built by the Romans, or that the Mayan ruins of Tikal were built by

the citizens of Atlantis, European writers have often struggled to believe

that the indigenous people of other lands were capable of great

constructions. This kind of thinking follows a circular logic. Only a so-called

advanced civilization could have built these things, but the people I see living

here don't look like an advanced civilization, therefore these people

can't have built these monuments. The problems with this kind of thinking are

obvious. It deceives us into thinking that an advanced civilization can only

look like a European civilization, highly centralized and organized, and the very

notion of a society being advanced suggests that human progress follows a

fixed and inevitable path, and that our way of organizing our societies and

economies is the only one. It's this kind of thinking that made early explorers of

Easter Island look at the advanced rock mulching techniques of the Rapa Nui

people and see only a wasteland scattered with rocks. This belief system

found its logical conclusion in the Norwegian adventurer and archaeologist

Thor Heyerdahl. Heyerdahl believed that the Polynesian islands had been populated

not by Polynesians hopping the islands from the West, but from people from South

America traveling by raft from the East. He also believed, curiously, that these

people must have been white-skinned and European in origin. He simply couldn't

comprehend the idea that other peoples around the world could have developed

such artistic and architectural skills. So what appeared to be a puzzle to early

European visitors wasn't actually a puzzle at all. The stone statues of Easter

Island hadn't been built by some vanished ancient culture, but by the

people who lived there already and seemed to those Europeans to be so

simple. This idea of a societal collapse happening on Easter Island before

contact with the Europeans has survived into our day, even though it has very

little basis in fact. But this doesn't mean that a collapse didn't occur on

Rapa Nui. In fact, the island would soon undergo one of the most dramatic

examples of societal and cultural destruction that can be found in history.

But it wasn't because they cut down the trees. There is one event in Easter

Island's history that I think encapsulates the complete destruction

that would soon rain down on it and its poor unsuspecting inhabitants. That's the

toppling in only a few years of every one of the island's statues. For centuries

the islanders had loved and revered the Moai that their ancestors had spent

generations carving and transporting. And in 1722 the Dutch sailor Behrens

recounts what he saw of the islanders devotion to these statues. They kindle

fire in front of certain remarkably tall stone figures they set up, and

thereafter, squatting on their heels with heads bowed down, they bring the palms of

their hands together and alternately raise and lower them. But with every

subsequent European visitor to the island, this situation seemed to change.

On the 15th of November 1770, 48 years after the first European visit, a second

arrived. Two Spanish ships landed there and spent five days on the island,

performing a very thorough survey of its coast. They renamed the island Isla de

San Carlos and claimed it on behalf of King Charles III of Spain. They also

ceremoniously erected three wooden crosses and a Spanish flag on a hill.

When they explored the island, it seems that all of the 200 erected statues were

still standing. But four years later, the famous British explorer Captain Cook

sailed past the island and found a much different situation. Cook's diary of

Thursday the 17th of March 1774 gives his account of the impoverished state of

the island. This is undoubtedly the same island as was seen by Roggeveen in April

1722, although the description given of it by the author of that voyage does by

no means correspond with it now. No nation will ever contend for the honor

of the discovery of Easter Island, as there is hardly an island in this sea

which affords less refreshments and conveniences for shipping than it does.

Nature has hardly provided it with anything fit for man to eat or drink, and

the natives are but few and plant no more than sufficient for themselves. If

Cook's account is to be believed, the population size of Easter Island also

seems to have taken a serious hit. The inhabitants of this isle, from what we

have been able to see of them, do not exceed six or seven hundred souls. And

there's another significant detail too. Cook noted that the islanders now

carried weapons when approaching foreign visitors. Their arms are wooden

patapataus and clubs, very much like those of New Zealand, and spears about

six or eight feet long which are pointed at one end with pieces of black flint.

But the final tragic detail is that in the four years since the Spanish

expedition, virtually all of the standing Moai on the island had been toppled over.

On the east side, near the sea, they met with three platforms of stonework, or

rather, the ruins of them. On each had stood four of those large statues, but

they were all fallen down, all except one were broken by the fall or in some

measure defaced. The practice of statue toppling is called Huri Moau in the

Rapa Nui language and it continued into the 1830s. By 1838, every single coastal

Moai had been taken down. Now, the only standing statues were those abandoned on

the slopes below the quarry at Ranuraku. So, what happened to make the islanders

start to carry weapons? What caused their population to reduce so heavily?

And what made them turn so dramatically against their gods? Well, the answer to

that may lie in the very event that opened this episode and which we've

returned to a number of times. That's the arrival of three Dutch sails on the

horizon on Easter Day 1722.

At the sight of the enormous ships dropping anchor some way off the coast,

the Easter Islanders gathered on the shore in astonishment. They must have

felt how we would feel if a vast alien spaceship were to one day materialize

over one of our cities. It must have been a mix of fear and wonder, a sense

that the world would never quite be the same again. They selected one of their

number who must have been the bravest of them all. It's not unlikely, I think, that

he would have been the winner of the most recent Birdman competition, the

island's champion and protector. This man got in his canoe and rode out to meet

the strange vessels whose white sails must have looked brilliant and dazzling

in the sunlight. Perhaps he wouldn't have immediately realized how large they were

until he got up close and their prows began to loom over his small canoe. When

he approached, he saw that there were men on board and he waved to them. The Dutch

officer, Carl Friedrich Behrens, wrote about this incredible encounter.

But this light-hearted encounter conceals a dark truth about

Roggeveen's visit. In fact, when Roggeveen and his men went ashore, their visit

would turn to tragedy. It's clear from both accounts that the Europeans were

nervous when they stepped ashore. They had heard stories of violent encounters

with indigenous people and it's worth noting that the novel Robinson Crusoe

had been published only three years before, full of garish stories of

cannibalism and murder. Despite their guns and cannons, it's clear that the

islanders frightened them and the natural curiosity and boldness of the

Rapa Nui people seemed to make matters worse. When the Dutchmen got ashore, the

islanders pressed around them, grabbing at their hats and clothes and even

touching the guns they carried. It's not clear which Dutchman shot first, but the

situation quickly spiraled out of control. The Europeans fired into the

unarmed crowd of islanders. Their guns were flintlock pistols and rifles that

would have sent up puffs of smoke and the cries of people shot would have rang

out, with the smell of gunpowder filling the air. Behrens recounts what happened

next, as he recognized a familiar face among the murdered islanders.

Many of them were shot at this juncture and among the slain lay the man who had

been with us before, of which we were much grieved. In order to obtain

possession of the bodies, they congregated in great numbers, bringing

with them presents of various kinds of fruits and vegetables, in order that we

might the more readily surrender to them their slain. The consternation of these

people was by no means abated. Even with their children's children in that place

will, in times to come, be able to recount the story of it. We can assume that what

Behrens said is true. The story of this violent encounter must have reverberated

through the history of the Rapa Nui people. It would have destabilized their

ancient beliefs and rocked their very sense of the world around them. Remember

that Behrens mentions that the islanders didn't have any weapons at this point,

that they only prayed to their gods for protection. Now imagine what would happen

to this belief system when visitors arrived from the sea, killed multiple

islanders with what must have appeared to be magic weapons, and then when these

visitors walked around the island, even approaching the statues, and then sailed

away unharmed. When you think about this encounter through that lens, it becomes a

lot clearer why the Rapa Nui might have lost faith in their ancestors. But the

sad truth is that the European bullets were not the deadliest legacy they left

behind. The true killer of the Rapa Nui would have been something much smaller,

invisible microbes, viruses and bacteria to which the islanders' immune systems

had never been exposed.

Europe has always been a crossroads between many different peoples, sometimes

separated by hundreds or even thousands of miles. Europe's constant wars and

exchange of trade spread localized diseases across the continent. Each

year the Silk Road brought fresh shipments of disease from China and

India, along with silks and spices. This all resulted in Europeans becoming

immune to a large variety of diseases. But although the diseases didn't affect

them, they could still carry them, and for populations that had not suffered the

same exposure, these germs could be devastating. In pathology, this phenomenon

is known as the virgin soil effect. It's not recorded what diseases may have been

transmitted. In other parts of the uncontacted world, cholera, measles,

diphtheria and even the bubonic plague swept through populations. By even the

lowest estimates, indigenous populations were reduced by 80% right across the

Americas. Four out of every five people died and it's likely that in the even

more isolated environment of Easter Island, the effects could have been even

more devastating. On other better observed Polynesian islands, the

reduction in population after first contact was as much as 90%.

And so, in the decades after the Dutch visit, we can imagine disease ravaging

the helpless population of Rapa Nui. It's possible that the population of the

island may have crashed from a height of around 3,000 to only a few hundred.

The population may have only just recovered by the time 48 years later that

the Spanish arrived and delivered a whole new dose of invisible death to the

islanders. The Rapa Nui people wouldn't have been able to understand why this

was happening to them. In fact, if you'd asked the Europeans of the time what

caused these diseases, they wouldn't know either. They may have told you that

they were caused by miasmas or bad night air, this being the prevailing theory at

the time. As whole families of islanders died, the Rapa Nui must have believed

that the ancestors they had so laboriously carved to protect the island

had failed them. By the time the Spanish brought the second wave of disease and

it began ravaging the population all over again, those looming monoliths on

the coast may have begun to represent not protective spirits but the very

specters of death themselves. The islanders, one by one, began to bring

them down. Soon, these fallen giants would litter the landscape. Now, only those

abandoned Moai, half buried in the runoff from the quarry, would remain upright and

the age of Easter Island statues would come to an end.

The loss of Easter Island's culture was an incalculable tragedy for our

understanding of humanity. One of the reasons this is true is that Easter

Island may have been one of the few places on earth where writing was

independently invented. A kind of script called rongo-rongo has been found on

just a few dozen wooden objects and tablets that have survived from Rapa

Nui. Many of them are heavily weathered, burned or otherwise damaged and they

were all plundered by private collectors in the 19th century, now scattered in

museums and private collections around the world. Every modern attempt to

decipher rongo-rongo has failed and the script stands as one of the true

mysteries of Easter Island. Many of the glyphs that make up the script are

representations of things the islanders saw around them. We can see the familiar

shapes of sea turtles and birds, for instance. The legends of the islanders

say that the original founder, the man they called Hotumatua, had brought the

wooden tablets with him when he landed on Easter Island. But this seems

unlikely. There is no known tradition of writing anywhere else in Polynesia and

so it's thought that rongo-rongo must have been an invention of the islanders

themselves. It doesn't seem like literacy was ever widespread. In fact, early

visitors to the island were told that reading and writing was a privilege of

the ruling families and priests. Some have argued that rongo-rongo must be a

more modern invention, that the islanders may have seen Europeans reading and

writing, thus inspiring them to create their own script. If this were the case,

then the written language of rongo-rongo would have emerged, flourished and then

fallen into oblivion, all within a space of less than a hundred years. But I think

one detail of the script makes me doubt this. That's the character that shows

clearly and unambiguously the distinctive wine bottle shape of a

jubaea palm tree, a species that went extinct on the island before the year

1650, more than 70 years before first European contact. To my mind, this alone

shows that rongo-rongo was developed on the island during a time when giant palms

still towered over its shores. In 1864, a French churchman, Eugène Ayrault, arrived on

the island and described seeing a vast number of these writing tablets, although

it seemed to him that the islanders no longer valued them as repositories of

knowledge. In every hut, one finds wooden tablets or sticks covered in several

sorts of hieroglyphic characters. They are depictions of animals unknown on the

island which the natives draw with sharp stones. Each figure has its own name, but

the scant attention they pay to these tablets leads me to think that these

characters, remnants of some primitive writing, are now for them a habitual

practice which they keep without seeking its meaning. European visitors in the

following decades reported seeing the islanders using these writing tablets as

reels for their fishing lines and as tools for fire-starting. By this time,

none of the islanders could agree on how to read the tablets. Whatever knowledge

was held in the rongo-rongo script, the destruction of the island society had

caused it to be lost. If attempts at deciphering it continue to be

unsuccessful, we may never know what the Rapa Nui people wrote down. This

Learn languages from TV shows, movies, news, articles and more! Try LingQ for FREE

Easter Island - Where Giants Walked . Isla de Pascua - Donde caminaron gigantes . Isola di Pasqua - Dove camminavano i giganti . Ilha de Páscoa - Onde os Gigantes Caminharam . Остров Пасхи - где ходили великаны . Paskalya Adası - Devlerin Yürüdüğü Yer .

In the early 18th century, a Dutch explorer named Admiral Jacob Roggeveen

was sailing across the vast blue expanse of the South Pacific Ocean. He had been navegaba por la vasta extensión azul del Océano Pacífico Sur. Había estado

on the sea for 17 days, searching the southern ocean for a mythical continent

known as Terra Australis. And when he saw a small island on the horizon, his heart conocida como Terra Australis. Y cuando vio una pequeña isla en el horizonte, su corazón

must have skipped a beat, as Roggeveen recounts in his diary. debe de haber saltado un latido, como Roggeveen relata en su diario.

There was a great rejoicing among the people and everyone hoped that this low Hubo un gran regocijo entre la gente y todos esperaban que este bajo

land might prove to be a foretoken of the unknown southern continent. But as tierra podría ser un presagio del desconocido continente austral. Pero

their ships approached, it became clear that this was no vast continent, only a sus barcos, se hizo evidente que no se trataba de un vasto continente, sino de una

small island, a dot of land in the middle of the ocean. Nevertheless, Roggeveen pequeña isla, un punto de tierra en medio del océano. Sin embargo, Roggeveen

was curious and he ordered his three ships to prepare for landing. It was era curioso y ordenó a sus tres barcos que se prepararan para el desembarco. Fue

Easter Day, 1722. As the Dutch got closer, it became clear that the island ahead of Día de Pascua de 1722. A medida que los holandeses se acercaban, se hizo evidente que la isla por delante de

them was inhabited. They saw smoke rising from the villages along the coast, estaba habitada. Vieron humo saliendo de los pueblos a lo largo de la costa,

but it was a seemingly barren land. We originally, from a further distance, pero era una tierra aparentemente estéril. Nosotros originalmente, desde una distancia más lejana,

considered Easter Island to be sandy. The reasons for that is that we counted as consideraba que la isla de Pascua era arenosa. La razón es que contábamos como

sand the withered grass, hay or other scorched and burnt vegetation, because arena la hierba marchita, el heno u otra vegetación chamuscada y quemada, porque

its wasted appearance could give no other impression than of a singular su aspecto consumido no podía dar otra impresión que la de un singular

As they sailed closer, the island's inhabitants came out on canoes to meet A medida que se acercaban, los habitantes de la isla salieron en canoas a su encuentro.

them, greeting them with friendly astonishment. This was much like other saludándoles con amistoso asombro. Esto era muy parecido a otras

islands that Roggeveen had visited before, but when he got ashore, what he found on

this island amazed him. Along the beaches, lined up in rows with their backs to the esta isla le asombró. A lo largo de las playas, alineadas en hileras de espaldas al

sea, was a line of stone statues. They were carved from black volcanic stone, mar, había una hilera de estatuas de piedra. Estaban talladas en piedra volcánica negra,

some of them standing 10 meters high, wearing crowns of red sandstone. But algunas de 10 metros de altura, con coronas de arenisca roja. Pero

Roggeveen and his men couldn't understand how these statues had got

there. The stone images at first caused us to be struck with astonishment, because

we couldn't comprehend how it was possible that these people, who were no podíamos comprender cómo era posible que estas personas, que eran

devoid of heavy thick timber for making any machines, as well as strong ropes, desprovisto de madera gruesa y pesada para fabricar cualquier máquina, así como de cuerdas fuertes,

nevertheless had been able to erect such images which were fully 30 feet high and

thick in proportion. Roggeveen and his men didn't stay long. They soon set sail

away from the island and on across the Pacific. But the remarkable image stayed

with them and they must have asked themselves how did those people

construct so many vast stone statues when so little building material seemed

available to them? Why had they built so many? And if such an advanced civilization

had once lived on this island, where on earth had it vanished to?

My name is Paul Cooper and you're listening to the Fall of Civilizations

podcast. Each episode I look at a civilization of the past that rose to

glory and then collapsed into the ashes of history. I want to ask what did they

have in common? What led to their fall and what did it feel like to be a person tienen en común? ¿Qué les llevó a caer y qué sintieron al ser una persona

alive at the time who witnessed the end of their world? In this episode, I want to vivo en ese momento que fue testigo del fin de su mundo? En este episodio, quiero

tell the story of one of archaeology's most enduring puzzles, the mystery of

Easter Island. I want to explore why it's not actually much of a mystery at all. I Isla de Pascua. Quiero explorar por qué en realidad no es un gran misterio. I

want to examine how this unique community grew up in complete isolation,

how it survived the test of centuries against overwhelming odds, and I want to cómo sobrevivió a la prueba de los siglos frente a probabilidades abrumadoras, y quiero

take you through the evidence about what happened to finally bring this society

and its enormous statues crashing down.

The Pacific Ocean is the largest and deepest of Earth's oceans. At over 165

million square kilometers, it covers one-third of the Earth's total surface.

It's so vast that if you were to look at Earth from outer space, it's just about

possible to position yourself so that only the Pacific Ocean is visible and

you could imagine that you were looking at a planet completely composed of water.

But the Pacific is not an unbroken sea. Across its blue expanse, there are over Pero el Pacífico no es un mar ininterrumpido. A lo largo de su extensión azul, hay más de

25,000 islands of varying size, many of them thrown up by volcanic eruptions 25.000 islas de tamaño variable, muchas de ellas provocadas por erupciones volcánicas.

that burst from the lively tectonics of the Pacific Plate. Easter Island is at

the eastern corner of an area we call the Polynesian Triangle, a vast region of

the Pacific Ocean broken by over a thousand volcanic islands. Easter el océano Pacífico interrumpido por más de mil islas volcánicas. Pascua

Island itself is a loosely triangular shape too, made up of three extinct

volcanoes at each of its points. The largest of these volcanoes is called

Terevaka. It's a young volcano bursting out of the sea less than 400,000 years

ago, its lava gushing out and raising a peak that looms half a kilometer above y su lava brota y levanta un pico que se eleva medio kilómetro por encima de la ciudad.

the ocean. When it first erupted, Terevaka's lava pooled so that it joined

up two older volcanoes on either side of it and the landmass that today we call

Easter Island was born. The people who have lived on Easter Island for centuries

call it by the name Te Pito o Te Henua, which translates literally to the center

of the world. Other names for it are translated as the land's end or fragment

of the earth, and today's Polynesians call the island Rapa Nui. Rapa Nui is a

small island, only about 24 kilometers end-to-end and 12 kilometers wide, and

it's one of the most remote and isolated places on earth. From the coast of Easter

Island, it would take 3,200 kilometers to reach the nearest continent of South

America, about the distance from Paris to Damascus, and even the nearest inhabited

island is over 2,000 kilometers away.

The Polynesians who first settled the island arrived from the West. Sometime

before the year 3000 BC, they had left the mainland of the Asian continent, and

since that time, these hardy sailors had perfected their craft until they were

the most successful ocean-going settlers in history. They built large

sturdy canoes with two hulls, in fact, effectively two canoes joined by a deck

and with two masts with sails. The catamaran design of these ships was

incredibly sophisticated, and in fact, they look like a modern sailing boat

used for racing. They were both stable and fast, and they allowed the Polynesians

to gradually settle the entire Pacific Ocean. These early settlers navigated the

oceans without any physical navigation devices. They knew the stars well enough

that they could make astonishing calculations about latitude and

longitude using only the night sky, and they didn't write this detailed

knowledge down, but used only songs and stories to memorize the properties and

positions of the stars, islands, and known sea routes. The Polynesians also used the

natural world as an aid to their navigation. They followed the flight

paths of seabirds like the black tern, and this ancient Polynesian sailors' song

shows the significance of these birds. The black tern, the black tern is my bird,

bird in whom my eyes are gifted with unbounded vision. These epic voyages were

all the more impressive because the winds in the South Pacific blow westwards

against the direction of the Polynesians' expansion. To travel these vast distances

against the winds, the explorers developed a sailing technique known as

tacking, where the craft zigzags against a prevailing wind in order to catch some

forward motion. And storms in the Pacific could be deadly to these early

explorers. It's been recorded that when a severe typhoon struck, these sailors had

a method of surviving that seems unthinkable to a modern sailor. They un método de supervivencia que parece impensable para un marinero moderno. Ellos

would actually purposefully flood the hulls of their canoes, and because the inundarían a propósito los cascos de sus canoas, y porque el

wooden hulls provided enough flotation, the ship would stay afloat. But with most cascos de madera proporcionaban suficiente flotación, el barco se mantendría a flote. Pero con la mayoría

of its body submerged, it would survive being bufted about in the gale-force de su cuerpo sumergido, sobreviviría a ser sacudido por la fuerza del vendaval...

winds. While the storm went on, the sailors would climb inside their

flooded hulls, keeping their heads above water, and wait for the winds to pass.

There has long been a debate about when exactly these intrepid Polynesian

adventurers arrived on Easter Island. It was long assumed that they had arrived

sometime in the fourth or fifth centuries, but studies of the islanders

language and radiocarbon dating recently revised that estimate to somewhere

around the 8th century, and even more modern analysis has pushed that date

forward even further. Many scientists today believe that Rapa Nui wasn't

settled until sometime around the year 1200 AD. At this time around the world,

the Mongol armies of Genghis Khan were finalizing their conquests of northern

China. The notorious Fourth Crusade, headed for Jerusalem, instead sacked and

burned the Christian capital of Constantinople. An exotic import from

Arabia called sugar was mentioned for the first time in an English text. On

the other side of the world, in the middle of the vast expanse of the

Pacific, a small band of Polynesian sailors landed their boats on the shores

of a new land.

An ancient piece of Rapa Nui folklore credits the settlement of the island to

a Polynesian king called Hotu Matua.

In Heva, Haumaka had a dream in which his spirit traveled to a far country,

looking for a new home for his king Hotu. His spirit arrived at three small

islands, and another with a larger one with a crater on the southwest corner.

The island was the eighth or last island in the dim twilight of the rising sun.

The spirit traveled counterclockwise around the island, naming 28 places,

including Anakena, a landing place on the north coast of the island and future

residence of the king. When Haumaka awoke, he told his brother Huatava about the

dream. After hearing about the dream, Hotu Matua ordered Haumaka to send some

young men to explore the island. Hotu Matua told his two sons to build a canoe

and search for the island of Haumaka's dream. So the seven men left in a canoe,

stocked with yams, sweet potatoes, bananas and other foods. They left on the

25th day of April and arrived on the first day of June, a voyage of five weeks.

These settlers brought everything that was required for the traditional Estos colonos trajeron todo lo necesario para la tradicional

Polynesian lifestyle. They brought their most crucial foods, bananas, a root

vegetable called taro with broad elephant ear leaves, as well as sweet

potatoes and sugar cane. They also brought saplings of the paper mulberry

tree, the fibers of which they used to weave clothes. They brought animals

with them too, although only those small enough to be transported. They brought

chickens and also the Polynesian rat, which was an everyday food for common

people. This was an entire ecological system in waiting, packed up in the

hulls of their canoes, optimized for transport and ready to be transplanted

to a new land. Hotu Matua may not have realized it, but his arrival on Easter

Island was of profound significance, not just for him and his people, but for all

of mankind. That's because Easter Island was the final stop on a journey of

60,000 years that had taken mankind out of Africa, through Asia and onto the

Americas. The final chapter of this journey was the gradual colonization of

the Polynesian islands, and Easter Island was the furthest and final piece of

uninhabited land. Mankind's journey out of Africa ended on the shores of Easter

Island, and with that step, a new phase of humanity's history began. I think it's

worth noting at this point that apart from the evidence we can find in the

archaeological record, we have essentially two sources of information

about the history of Easter Island, and each of them has their problems. Firstly,

there are the accounts of European visitors to the island, like the Dutchman

Roggeveen. These accounts come down to us either in the form of ships' logs or in

the form of memoirs written down when these explorers returned to their

homelands. The biggest problem for researchers of Rapa Nui's history is

that these early visitors to the island left behind accounts that are extremely

limited in their content and their reliability, and that sometimes directly

contradict each other. Most of them stayed for only a few days, they rarely se contradicen entre sí. La mayoría de ellos se quedaban sólo unos días, rara vez

wandered far from their landing spot, and they commented little on the culture, se alejaron mucho de su lugar de aterrizaje, y comentaron poco sobre la cultura,

language, or society of the islanders. In the debate that has raged over what

happened on Easter Island, many writers have tried to use a selective reading of

these accounts in order to support their own favoured argument, and that's

something we should be very careful about as we go forward and assess the

evidence. But these written records do provide us with some useful information.

At times, as you'll see, they give us fixed points in time around which we can

build our story. The second source of information is the oral folklore of the

islanders themselves. This was passed down by word of mouth through the

generations, often in the form of songs and stories, and this can give us a

wonderful sense of how the islanders view their own history and their own

sense of identity. But this source of information can also be very difficult

to rely on when trying to sort historical fact from fiction. The

different strands of the island's folklore is also often extremely

contradictory, and the reason for that isn't hard to imagine. Detailed

observations of these songs and stories weren't written down until the 1880s, and

by that time, the culture of Rapa Nui had already undergone drastic change. By this

point, they had been in contact with the outside world for more than a hundred

and fifty years, and their population was reduced to a tiny fraction of what it

had once been. Now, only a few survivors pass down the stories they remembered,

and to add another level of confusion, these stories were written down by early

European explorers who may have mistranslated as well as added and

embellished elements that didn't exist in the original. One example of this is

the question of the name of the island's first king, who we've already mentioned,

Hotu Matua. But his name is so similar to the folk hero of another nearby island,

Mangareva, that some researchers have questioned whether this name isn't a

foreign import to Easter Island. If we can't trust this important detail to

have been faithfully transmitted, perhaps we can't be too sure about the rest. These

stories, refracted through these various mirrors, are now connected to the true

facts of the distant past by only the most fragile of threads. This is all to

make it very clear to you that the history of Easter Island is not even

close to being a settled matter, and it often relies on fragmentary and

contradictory evidence. Today, new research has begun to challenge the

familiar narrative we've all grown up with, and we will have to deal with a lot

of uncertainty as we forge ahead through the tragic story of this most remarkable

island. According to tradition, the first Polynesian settlers arrived on Easter

Island at a point called Anakena, a white coral sand beach on the north of the

island that forms a natural harbour. It's worth mentioning that the

landscape these first settlers would have seen was very different to the one

we see today on Rapa Nui. The bare grassy slopes first spied by Roggeveen in the

18th century and which we know from images today, would have been nowhere to

be seen. In fact, they would have been covered by a thick forest of tropical

palm trees. If you dig down into the earth of Easter Island today, you can

still see the hollow molds left by the roots of these trees. Studies of these

root molds as well as pollen analysis shows that when humans arrived on Rapa

Nui, the island was home to over 21 species of trees. Some of these were

large, including at least three which grew up to 15 meters or more. One species

of palm tree, the Easter Island or Rapa Nui palm, may even have been among the

largest species of palm tree in the world. This now extinct tree, known as

Pascalococcus, seems to have once been the most numerous species on the island

and its closest relative today, Jubaea chilensis or the Chilean wine palm, can

reach heights of over 25 meters, its bulbous trunk the thickest in the world,

reaching a diameter of more than a meter. The soil of Easter Island has never been

rich but the forest would have provided a small amount of food for the new

settlers, palm nuts and fruits too, along with the birds in the trees that could

be trapped. Luckily for archaeologists, the sand of Anakena Beach, the site of

that first settlement, is particularly good at preserving bone and human

remains. Because of this, skeletons examined here have given scientists

insight into the lives of the ancient Rapa Nui. Studies have shown that as well

as these plant crops, people supplemented their diet with a mix of marine animals,

including dolphins they trapped in the Bay of Anakena, seals, sea turtles, and

fish that they caught with hooks carved from bone. In fact, bone chemistry

analysis has shown that the people here got about half of their diet from the

sea. They cooked all of these foods in earth ovens known as umu, cavities dug

into the ground which then had burning grass and leaves placed on top of them

so the heat radiated downwards. These people were ingenious and inherited

knowledge from their ancestors. They made textiles from the fibers of the paper

mulberry tree and spun rope from a tree known as the how tree. With this

healthy and diverse mix of foodstuffs and resources, their settlement became

incredibly successful. From there, using slash-and-burn agricultural methods, the

original settlers spread quickly across the small landmass of the island and

they soon began to clear the forest in order to plant their crops, until the

whole of Rapa Nui was fully populated with around 3,000 people. Slowly, that

primeval palm forest began to disappear from Easter Island.

I think at this point, it's worth running you through that traditional story of

what happened on Easter Island. It has been the dominant narrative about this

island for decades, perhaps even centuries. It was begun by early European

explorers, propagated by Victorian and 20th century anthropologists, and finally

popularized by authors like the popular science writer Jared Diamond. You

might find it familiar. In this narrative, the inhabitants of Easter Island were

the architects of their own demise. The story goes that their population boomed

until the island could no longer support it. They cut down their trees to use as

firewood for construction material and to use as rollers to transport their

enormous statues. The loss of trees on the island resulted in an ecological

collapse that destroyed the fertility of the soil and the productive potential of

the island fell apart. Along with the collapse of the island's ecology, the

complex and centralized society that had built the hundreds of stone statues on

the coast began to collapse too. Resources became scarce, starvation ran

rampant and this led to a period of violent civil war. Shortly before the

arrival of the Europeans in 1722, the whole of Rapa Nui society had come apart

and only a few thousand survivors were left. Jared Diamond, perhaps the greatest

champion of this theory today, puts it bluntly. In just a few centuries, the

people of Easter Island wiped out their forests, drove their plants and animals

to extinction and saw their complex society spiral into chaos.

This story has a widespread appeal for a number of reasons. In the latter half of

the 20th century, as we became increasingly concerned about our own

society's destructive impact on our environment, the story of Easter Island

became irresistible as an example of the fate that might befall us if we fail to

respect the environment around us. The stone statues too have proved

irresistible as emblems of human folly, our desire to always build bigger and

better than our neighbors. In his book, Jared Diamond even makes the comparison

to his neighbors in Hollywood building ever bigger and better mansions in an

effort to prove their status. The islanders were so obsessed with these

statues, the narrative goes, that they cut down all their trees to transport them.

This single-minded obsession drove them to starvation, then cannibalism and

finally to the edge of extinction. But there are a number of problems with this

narrative, a number of seriously questionable assumptions and over the

course of this episode, I'm going to try to unpick three of the most glaring of

these assumptions so that you can assess the evidence for yourself. Firstly,

there's the assumption that the Easter Islanders deforested their island due to

greed, overpopulation, or even a maniacal obsession with statue building. Secondly,

there's the assumption that the loss of the forest led to a societal collapse.

Thirdly, there's the assumption that Easter Island society collapsed at all,

at least before contact with the outside world. As we'll see, each of these

assumptions has significant problems and once we've dealt with them, we can get

down to what actually happened to decimate the islanders of Rapa Nui, to

strip the island of its plant life and to leave those famous stone statues

moldering on the lone grassy hills of Easter Island.

Virtually as soon as they arrived on the island, probably around the year 1200, the

islanders began carving the monuments that would one day make them famous

around the world. Stone statues are common on islands across the Polynesian

world but no other island can compete with the size of the Easter Island

statues or with the incredible number carved. These statues are called moai. The

moai are known for their large, broad noses and strong chins, along with

rectangle-shaped ears and deep eye slits. For the Easter Islanders, these statues

were what they called a ringa ora ata te puna, that is, the living faces of the

holy ancestors. These are stone representations of the islanders that

have gone before. Of the moai that were successfully moved into place, the vast

majority stand on the coast of the island on monolithic stone platforms

called ahu. While most people's eyes are drawn by the statues, these ahu are

themselves impressive undertakings. They are built of enormous stones cut so

precisely that they fit together in a perfect jigsaw, with not even enough room

to fit a razor blade between the stones. The largest of them, ahu Tongariki, holds

15 moai lined up in perfect order. Nearly all moai stand with their backs to the

sea, staring inland over the fields and hills of Rapa Nui with their deep,

expressive eyes. Almost all of the statues are carved from a volcanic stone

known as tuff. Tuff is formed when ash from a volcanic eruption falls thickly

on the ground and is then slowly compacted into solid rock. Tuff is

relatively soft and easy to carve, so it has been used for construction since

ancient times. It commonly occurs in Italy, for instance, and the Romans often

used it in their buildings. Most of the moai statues were carved in a quarry on

the outer cliff edge of the Rano Raraku crater. This quarry is an eerie sight

today. Here and there, the faces of half-finished giants still peer out of

the stone. The Rano Raraku crater is 700 meters across, formed of ash and

volcanic tuff thrown up in an ancient explosion and rings by cliffs 160 meters

high. The wide volcanic bowl is one of the three places on Easter Island where

fresh water pools to form a lake. Here, a kind of bulrushes called totora grow on

the water's edge, nodding in the breeze, and the Rapa Nui people once collected

them to weave thatched roofs for their houses. But it's on the outer slopes of

the crater's cliffs that the truly important activity took place. Here, the

islanders chipped their statues directly from the bedrock, using a kind of stone

chisel known as a toki that was made of dense basalt, perfectly suited for

carving the softer volcanic tuff. This would have been incredibly slow work.

Work that might take a modern craftsman with a steel chisel one hour might take

an Easter Islander with a stone toki a whole day or two days to complete. And

although estimates vary, it's thought that an entire statue could take over a

year for a team of 12 people to carve.

One fascinating aspect of this quarry is that there are a huge number of

incomplete Moai abandoned here, 397 in total. That's nearly half of the island's

total population of 887, and this shows just how difficult the carving of these

statues was. These abandoned Moai have been discarded for different reasons,

some more obvious than others. On some statues, it's clear that the workmen

discovered a seam of hard rock somewhere on the Moai's body, which would have been

virtually impossible to carve with their stone tools. Others have obvious flaws or

cracks in them, while some Moai have fallen over while raising them. Other

Moai simply seem to have been too ambitious in size. The largest of these,

nicknamed El Gigante, is nearly 22 meters in height. That's twice the height of a

telephone pole or the size of a six-story building. El Gigante, still

lying on his back in the cliff face, is almost twice the size of any Moai ever

completed. This enormous statue would have weighed an estimated 270 tons and

it's hard to imagine how the islanders ever intended to move it. We might

imagine an ambitious ancient craftsman overseeing the carving of this vast

statue, determined to create the largest Moai that the island has ever seen. Or

perhaps, as we'll find out later, the islanders believed they had to summon a

truly enormous protective spirit to defend their island against a threat. To

get a sense for how these people must have felt about these statues, let's

imagine ourselves into the role of a team of Moai carvers during the golden

age of Rapa Nui statue carving. The work would have been slow and painstaking, but

it would also have carried a great deal of responsibility. While you were carving

a Moai, you weren't working in the fields and so your community was

investing in your work. There must have been a lot of pride tied up in the

creation of these statues too. Before the carving could even begin, there would

likely have been ceremonies and rites that had to take place, chants and

incantations designed to summon the protective spirit of the ancestor to

inhabit the stone. There's an apocryphal quote often attributed to the sculptor

Michelangelo. Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of

the sculptor to discover it. Whether or not he actually said this, this must have

been something like what the people of Rapa Nui felt as the months passed and

the great statue, its head and arms and body, slowly materialized from the cliff

face in front of them.

The days would have been hard. Many traditional Rapa Nui working songs

survive today and we can imagine the workers singing while they chipped away

at the cliff. One surviving folk song even derives its rhythm from the

striking together of two stones, emulating the sounds of the toki tools

napping away at the statue. Here it is, recorded especially for this podcast by

children from the Toki School of Music on Easter Island. The workers' hands must

have been covered in the blackish dust of the stone and they would take breaks

to eat meals of sweet potato and taro, along with the chicken baked white in

earth ovens nearby. After much arduous work, the whole outline of the Moai would

be carved out. They would then deepen the cuts and hollow out the cliff behind the

statue too, clambering into the narrow space and lying on their bellies as they

carved. But even with the back carved out, the statue would still be attached to

the bedrock below with a narrow keel that ran the length of its spine. And so,

the final and most painstaking stage of the process would begin. They would

gather up stones and earth in order to support the Moai so that it didn't fall

and then this spine of stone would slowly be chipped away. It must have been

an incredible moment when that last stone umbilical cord was cut. It was the

culmination of so much time and sweat of course, but it must have sent shivers

down their spines too, as the great statue of their ancestor broke free of

its stony slumber and was finally filled with a living spirit. It's likely that

more ceremonies surrounded this moment, the chanting of holy men who wore white

plugs in their ears and the beating of drums. Over what must have been days, the

Moai was edged clear of its quarry resting place, with huge teams of workers

pulling ropes spun from the how tree. When the statue was clear, they slid it

down the grassy slope of the volcano so that it could be stood upright at the

bottom of the slope. This was one of the most dangerous parts of the Moai's

journey, as the great number of cracked and abandoned statues on the slope below

the quarry shows us. They look like an army of stony wanderers marching down

from the volcano. Somewhat ironically, these abandoned statues, buried up to

their necks in the refuse from the quarry, form some of the most iconic

images of Easter Island today, more familiar to the layman than the

completed ones that stand on the Ahu platforms on the coast. This is why

people talk about the stone heads of Easter Island, ignoring the fact that

most of the Moai have bodies. At the bottom of the hill, the workmen would

raise the Moai up to a standing position so they could finish carving the details

on its back, using soft pumice to wear it smooth, and then they would prepare to

transport the statue into its final resting place on its Ahu. The carvers

could wipe the sweat from their foreheads and share congratulations, but

this was just the beginning of another long and arduous chapter in the Moai's

journey. At this point, I think it's worth noting that we don't actually know for

sure how the ancient islanders moved these vast statues. This question was

something that obsessed early visitors to the island. They looked around at the

seemingly barren landscape of Rapa Nui, at its grassy slopes seemingly devoid of

large trees, and asked how a people without metal tools, pulleys, or wheels

could transport nearly 500 of these vast statues. The largest successfully

transported Moai, nicknamed Paro, was 10 meters tall which is longer than a

London bus. It's estimated that this statue weighed about 82 tons, heavier

than a Boeing 737 aircraft when fully loaded with passengers and fuel. The

ancient islanders would sometimes transport these statues for distances of

20 kilometers across the island's rough, undulating terrain. It's a question that

has been asked of the islanders since Europeans first arrived. How did your

ancestors move these statues? And for a long time, the islanders would always

give the same reply. They would simply say they walked. Foreign visitors would

always roll their eyes at this answer. They assumed this must be a piece of

local folklore, a kind of magical thinking that imagined the statues to be

the living spirits of the ancestors. Some may even have thought that the Rapa Nui

were making fun of them, but researchers today have discovered that there may be

more truth to this legend than it seems. Early archaeologists believed that the

Rapa Nui moved the great stone statues into place using logs as rollers. In 1998,

archaeologist Joanne van Tilburg successfully tested this theory using a

large number of hardwood rollers to transport a statue for a short distance.

But recent research has cast doubt on this theory and proposed an incredible

alternate possibility, and the key to discovering how the statues were

actually moved lies in the ones that never made it to their intended

locations.

Littered across Easter Island are the sad shapes of statues that broke during

their transportation. Only about a fifth of the Moai ever carved would reach

their destination on the Ahu platforms, and these total about 200. The rest, some

700 more, were either abandoned in the quarry or along the roads. Stone heads

are cracked from bodies, decapitated statues lie moldering and moss-covered

in the long grass. For the ancient islanders, this must have been a

heart-rending sight. A whole team had worked for a year or more, then

successfully slid this statue down the slope of the volcano. Then, somewhere

its journey, it had cracked and the broken statue would have to be abandoned

by the side of the road. These so-called road Moai have a number of interesting

features. For instance, we know that the islanders waited to carve the eyes of

the Moai until the statues were in place on their platforms. This may have had a

ceremonial purpose which has parallels around the world. For instance, in Sri

Lanka, when new statues of the Buddha are built, the eyes are always the last part

to be painted and only the painter is allowed in the shrine room while doing

their work. But a team of archaeologists led by Terry Hunt and Carl Lipo also

found something else interesting about these abandoned statues. They noticed

that when abandoned road Moai were found on uphill paths, they usually lay on

their backs and when the cracked statues were abandoned on downhill

paths, they usually lay on their fronts. On flat ground, it was more like 50-50.

And so, a theory began to emerge. Is it possible that the statues were

transported upright? Once this detail had been noticed, other details about the

road Moai seemed to fall into place. For instance, the road Moai had bulkier, lower

halves and rounder bellies. This had puzzled archaeologists for a long time

but Hunt and Lipo's theory seemed to make sense of this. The islanders were

designing the Moai in two phases. In the first, the transportation phase, the Moai

were bottom-heavy like a bowling pin and once it had been rocked into place on

its platform, it was then carved into its more slender and elegant final shape.

And so, Lipo and Hunt proposed that the statues were rocked back and forth by

teams of islanders with ropes, so that the statues actually seemed to walk over

the ground. Their team caused an international sensation when they were

able to successfully walk a scale model of a Moai cast in concrete, rocking it

back and forth along the road with three teams holding ropes. In this way,

the statue could literally walk down the path, just as the ancient folklore

recounted. The team managed to move the statue at a rate of about a hundred

meters in an hour, meaning it could have walked around a kilometer in a day.

If this is indeed how the statues were moved, it must have been an incredible sight to see.

The tallest Moai weighed over 80 tons and each one of the statues'

footsteps would have thundered on the earth, so that it really seemed like a

giant was stamping its way towards the platform. There would have likely been a

huge amount of ceremonial activity around the walking of these statues too,

people coming from all over the island to watch, singing and dancing and all

kinds of activity. For the days and weeks it took to transport one of these

statues, it would have really felt like a god had come down to earth. I love the

romance and imagination behind Lipo and Hunt's theory and I think they build a

convincing case that this was indeed how the statues were moved. But you might ask,

well, why does it matter how the statues were moved? Isn't this a minor detail of

the story of this society's collapse? Well, actually, this question has come to

take on an enormous significance for the mystery of what happened on Easter

Island. The traditional narrative, if you remember, was that the Rapa Nui Islanders

became so obsessed with building their statues that they destroyed their

environment to do so. The islanders cut down all their trees, the theory says, in

order to use as scaffolds and rollers to transport them. If this was the case, then

each statue must have taken hundreds, if not thousands, of trees to transport and

this seemed the obvious answer to why the island was so deforested, why its

ecology collapsed and its society followed. But if Lipo and Hunt were

correct and the statues were walked into place, then very little wood was

needed and the whole narrative of the Moai causing the collapse of the

island's ecology comes into question. So, the whole mystery of Easter Island

seems to hinge on this question of whether the statues rolled or whether

they walked. So, what do we know about the loss of trees on Easter Island? One thing

we can say for sure, the subtropical palm forest that the first settlers found on

the island wouldn't long survive the arrival of humans. One of the earliest

casualties of this deforestation was the largest of the island's trees, the Rapa

Nui palm. If we want to guess at how this enormous tree grew, we can look at

its closest surviving relative, the Chilean wine palm. This tree takes 50

years to reach its full height and until then it doesn't produce a single fruit.

This slow-growing and slow-reproducing tree would have been one of the most

affected by the arrival of humans. Some theorists, Jared Diamond included, have

argued that the Easter Island palm would have been in high demand for use

as rollers to transport the giant Moai across the island, but experiments have

found that the palm would have been exceptionally badly suited for this job.

The hard outer shell of the palm trunk conceals a soft center that would have

been instantly crushed beneath the heavy stone statues. Diamond has even argued

that the palm may have been cut down in order to build large canoes, but nowhere

else in Polynesia are canoes built from palm trunks and they would be very

unsuitable for this purpose. So, what did happen to Easter Island's trees? Well,

undoubtedly, much of the forest was cut down by humans, but they didn't do this

unconsciously or foolishly. They did it for the same reason that people in

Iceland or England cut down their forests, because they were farmers. The

Rapa Nui, like all Polynesians, farmed energy-rich foods like sweet potatoes,

taro, and sugar cane. These abundant foods were vastly more productive than whatever

food they could have gathered from the forest. So, much of this deforestation was

controlled and conscious and actually improved the quality of these people's

lives. But that isn't to say there wasn't an ecological collapse on Easter Island.

Pollen analysis shows that virtually all large trees were lost from the island

within a matter of centuries, and by far the largest factor appears to have been

something very small. That's one of the animal companions that the original

settlers brought with them, the Polynesian rat. Wherever these Pacific

explorers went, they brought animals with them. Each Polynesian island got

some combination of these four animals, pigs, dogs, chickens, and rats. On Rapa Nui,

only rats and chickens were introduced. Some argued that these rats may have

stowed away on the canoes, just as they do on larger vessels, but rat has

actually been a foodstuff that Polynesians have relied on throughout

history. It was never a delicacy and seems to have been considered a food of

the common people, as rat bones are rarely found in the rubbish dumps of

high-status houses. However, they were a good and reliable source of protein on

long voyages. I can't speak to personal experience, but accounts I've read say

that rat tastes oily and gamey, a little like rabbit. Another advantage to

this source of food is that rats reproduce incredibly quickly. Once the

Polynesian rat was introduced to Easter Island, its spread would have been

unstoppable. The millions of giant palm trees covering the island would have

provided them with an almost unlimited supply of their favorite food, palm nuts.

Recent lab studies have shown that the reproductive potential of rats under

these ideal conditions can be enormous. In fact, the rat population could have

doubled every 47 days until they reached a population of up to 3 million and the

island was completely overrun. The rats would have quickly eaten the seeds and

palm nuts from the trees, preventing the forest from regenerating. In Anakena

Beach and certain caves, archaeologists have found the earliest remnants of

palm nut shells, showing the tooth marks of rats. As well as damaging the forests,

rats would also have eaten the eggs of seabirds, finishing off those the

islanders hadn't trapped and eaten. And since the seabirds fertilized the soil

with their droppings, this would have spelled disaster for the biodiversity of

Easter Island. But the question is, did this loss of trees cause a societal

collapse on Rapa Nui? The answer to that question is almost certainly not.

This isn't to say that the loss of palm forests on Rapa Nui didn't present a

number of challenges to the islanders. By around the year 1650, pollen studies

show that the deforestation of Easter Island was complete. Without tree cover,

the ocean winds could now blow right across the island. The wind and storms

threatened to blow away the topsoil and salt spray from the sea effectively

salted the earth in coastal regions, damaging the soil further. But in all

cases, the Rapa Nui islanders reacted to these challenges with ingenuity and

creativity. They transformed their island not into a desolate wasteland, but into

an astonishingly effective system of gardens, orchards and farmland. In fact,

archaeologists have found evidence of areas of the island where the islanders

planted groves of palm trees and cultivated them. Around this time, they

also began farming using a technique known as rock mulching. This involved

laying rock beds around the island which prevented the soil from washing or

blowing away. It also reduced the amount of water evaporated by the Sun and

increased the amount of nutrients available to growing plants as the

rainwater flowed over the rocks and carried minerals to their roots. Rock

mulching has been used by cultures around the world who live in harsh,

water-poor environments. It's been observed in the Negev Desert in Israel,

the pebbled fields of Lanzhou in China, the ash fields of the Canary Islands and

the fields of the Anasazi culture in New Mexico. The Rapa Nui set about the

task of rock mulching with the same great energy that they used to carve and

transport the Moai. They would ultimately cover half the landmass of their island

in rock gardens of this kind. It was an enormous task. It's been calculated that

over the 400 years that the practice was engaged in, it would have taken over 150

men working daily to construct these vast assemblages made up of billions of

stones. There's strong evidence that the Rapa Nui people also took advantage

of the deep underground caverns of the island.

The caves of Easter Island were formed by lava tubes which developed during the volcanic eruptions that

raised the islands out of the sea. When lava flows out of the mouth of a volcano,

it forms vast underground rivers as the lava on the surface cools and hardens

into rock. When the eruption ends and the lava stops flowing, the tubes drain their

lava, leaving enormous caverns that look as though a monstrous worm has eaten its

way through the rock. These tubes are as wide as a subway tunnel and Easter Island

has one of the largest systems of volcanic caves in the world. The

islanders' relationship with these caves goes back to the first known moment of

their history, as this piece of Rapa Nui folklore about King Hotu Matua shows.

The explorers went to the west side of the island and discovered a surfing spot.

They rode a wave to the right and called the place where they landed Hanga Roa.

They rode a wave to the left and landed at Apina Iti. They caught more waves, then

went ashore and rested in a cave at Pupaka Kina. Some of these caves can

stretch for three or four kilometers into the island's rock. As the forests

of Rapa Nui retreated, its people increasingly turned to these caves to

provide cover for their crops. They cultivated vast underground gardens

where they could grow sweet potatoes and yams to supplement their diet. They also

constructed circular rock walls called manavai that could be as much as six

feet tall and where they could grow a variety of crops. These kept plants safe

from the destructive elements of the weather, reduced the amount of water

runoff and concentrated nutrients. Archaeologists have identified over 2,500

of these rock gardens around the island, but this is likely only a fraction of

the original number. Studies have shown that even today, with no active

maintenance being done on them, these rings of rock are still operating as

designed by the ancient gardeners. Levels of phosphorus and potassium, crucial

minerals for plants, are much higher inside the manavai than outside, with the

concentrations being sometimes two or three times as high. Simply put, with

their rock gardening techniques, the Rapa Nui were able to make the land much

more productive after the forest was cleared than it was before. Some of this

great agricultural potential is hinted at in the accounts of the first Dutch

sailors to land on the island, although I will once again caution about trusting

too much in these accounts. Although Roggeveen believed Rapa Nui to be a

treeless, sandy wasteland from a distance, when he actually landed on the island, he

was surprised to find it a productive landscape. We found it not only not sandy,

on the contrary, exceedingly fruitful, producing bananas, potatoes, sugarcane of

remarkable thickness, many other kinds of the fruits of the earth. This place, as

far as its rich soil and good climate are concerned, is such that it might be made

into an earthly paradise. Another of Roggeveen's officers, a man named Carl

Friedrich Behrens, seems also to contradict this account of a treeless

island, and reported on a wide variety of uses the islanders had for palm leaves.

They gave us palm branches as peace offerings. Their houses were set up on

wooden stakes, daubed over with luting and covered with palm leaves. In fact,

Behrens paints a remarkably positive impression of the island overall. This

island is a suitable and convenient place at which to obtain refreshment, as

all the country is under cultivation and we saw in the distance whole tracts of

woodland. And Roggeveen himself also witnessed cultivated groves of fruit

trees on the island. It was now deemed advisable to go to the other side of the

island, the principal place of their plantations and fruit trees, for all the

things they brought to us of that kind were fetched from that quarter.

So here, a relatively clear picture is beginning to emerge. We can say for sure

that the arrival of humans on Rapa Nui resulted in the disappearance of most of

its forest. But this is true of virtually every forested island on earth after the

arrival of people, and no one has yet been able to draw a clear causative link

between the loss of the forest on Rapa Nui and the collapse of so-called

complex society. In fact, studies done on the skeletons of islanders from around

this time showed that they suffered from less malnutrition than the average

European. This all seems to be backed up by Roggeveen's account of his first

visit to the island. It's clear from his account that when he arrived, the Rapa

Nui islanders weren't starving. They didn't make any attempt to beg for food

from the newcomers. In fact, they were much more interested in the Europeans'

hats, and one brave islander even climbed through a porthole on Roggeveen's ship to

steal a tablecloth. But there's no account of them stealing the Europeans'

food. In fact, it was the Dutch, malnutritioned on a diet of salt meat

and hard tack after weeks at sea, who begged the islanders for food, giving

them cloth and linen in exchange for 60 chickens and 30 bunches of bananas. None

of this sounds like the behavior of a people living on the edge of starvation.

With multiple abundant sources of food, alongside the efficient use of the land

around them, archaeological and written evidence begins to make that popular

scenario of starvation and even cannibalism look patently absurd.

Part and parcel of the starvation narrative is the assumption that the

society of the island descended into a period of brutal conflict once resources

ran scarce. But if resources were abundant, can we also question this

assumption? The folklore of the islanders does record a period of warfare, after

which the Moai building culture faded into obscurity. But as we've seen, this

folklore can be unreliable at the best of times. Much more reliable is the

archaeological record. When a period of conflict occurs in such an environment,

the evidence is usually hard to miss.

One great example of this is the island of Fiji, another Pacific island 7,000

kilometers away. In Fiji, archaeologists have found the remains of strong hilltop

forts and fortified towns, all pointing to a period of warfare. In Hawaii, it's

well documented that chiefs fought each other in large battles featuring

hundreds of warriors armed with clubs. The signs of war in the archaeological

record aren't difficult to spot. Increased number of weapons, increased

building of defensive structures, and skeletal remains that bear the marks of

violence. First, let's look at the evidence of weapons on Rapa Nui. The

islanders did make blades from the black volcanic glass obsidian. Obsidian forms

in the vents of volcanic eruptions when lava reaches the surface and cools

quickly, forming a glassy material that is brittle but has exceptionally sharp

edges. In fact, obsidian blades have been measured to be up to a thousand times

sharper than a steel scalpel. The Rapa Nui gave their blades names depending on

their shape. Fishtail, rat spine, banana leaf are some examples. Some writers have

argued that the large amount of these blades found points to a mass production

of weaponry and a period of conflict. But studies of these blades have found that

their edges were mostly covered in vegetable matter, that's sweet potato and

taro, and they were found in the highest concentrations in the area of the

islanders' rock gardens, where they were most likely used for everyday tasks like

the preparation of food. Studies of skeletons have also seemed to undermine

this picture of conflict. In a historical zone of conflict, we would expect to see

skeletons missing their heads, for instance, or skulls with arrowheads

inside, broken bones and bones bearing scratches from blades glancing off them.

But studies of skeletal remains on Easter Island have shown that the

islanders were in fact remarkable for their mostly peaceful existence. Only

around 2% of the skeletons studied have been found to have suffered trauma from

blunt and cutting weapons, and this isn't a large proportion of the population. I

do think here it's also worth remembering Behrens' observation that

the islanders were unarmed when they first came to meet the Dutch explorers.

In the search for defensive structures, archaeologists have also found

themselves frustrated. The small Pacific island of Rapaiti, for instance, is five

times smaller than Easter Island and yet it has no fewer than 14 hilltop

fortresses. On Rapaiti, life on the island actually did descend into a

nightmare of violence and civil war and the signs of this are hard to miss.

Fortifications on Rapaiti involve watchtowers and walls, ditches and wooden

palisade fences. We find weapons here and human remains bearing the marks of

violence, but on Easter Island no such fortifications exist. One feature known

as the Poika ditch was long assumed to be a defensive structure, but recent

investigations have shown that it's actually a natural feature caused by the

collision of two lava flows. Some walls built at the entrances to caves have

also been used as evidence of the islanders fortifying themselves, but

there's little other evidence of the caves being used as military strongholds

and in fact they seem to be more commonly used as hiding places. So

another one of our assumptions about Easter Island has been taken away. Now

we're left having to explain how Rapa Nui's culture could actually have been

less violent than many other comparable societies and certainly less violent

than any city of Europe at the time. We may never know what decides whether a

small community will descend into a violent hell like Rapaiti or whether

they will work together to maintain the peace like on Rapa Nui. Some have

suggested that the Rapa Nui islanders, all descended from that first

colonization attempt, would have had many family relations between tribes and so

it may have been unthinkable to escalate conflict beyond the occasional

feud or skirmish. When a rival chief is also the husband of your wife's sister's

aunt, for instance, you might try to avoid excessive conflict and reach for

peaceful compromises, that is, if you want to avoid a frosty atmosphere at your

dinner table. On a small island, word travels fast and it doesn't pay to be

viewed as overly aggressive. Some historians have even argued that the

construction of the Moai themselves may have helped prevent conflict by allowing

the island's different communities to compete for dominance in a non-violent

way. Another way this may have occurred is through an incredible ritual known

as the Birdman Competition.

The later history of the island is dominated by the cult of a mysterious

figure known as the Tangata Manu or the Birdman. Cave paintings on Easter Island

show this ceremonial figure with the body of a man but the head and wings of

a bird. Each year the men of Rapa Nui took part in a ceremony that allowed

them to become the human embodiment of this figure for the next year. It was a

test of strength and daring that is astonishing to even contemplate today.

The contestants who competed to become the Birdman had a simple enough task.

Off the southwest coast of Rapa Nui, there is a small cluster of islands and

one of these is a rocky outcrop known as Motonui, which is home to several

species of nesting birds. Among these is the black tern, which we've already seen

held a mystical significance for Polynesian sailors. These birds seem to

be gifted with a magical ability to lead sailors home and it's not hard to see

how they would have assumed a powerful religious significance. The Birdman

contest took place in the spring during the laying season of the black terns.

Young men who wanted to become that year's Birdman would have to swim out to

the rocky island of Motonui, a distance of about a kilometer through choppy seas

and powerful currents. Once they reached the island, they had to climb up through

the flocks of cackling seabirds and search through their nests, looking for

the first egg of the season. Sometimes they would have to wait there for days.

But when they found their precious prize, they had to swim all the way back

to Rapa Nui. Then, dripping with cold salt water, they had to climb the sheer

300-meter cliff. The first man to complete this incredible triathlon event

would be crowned the Birdman. It's unclear how much power this figure actually had,

but in terms of status, there was no higher honor. And allowing men to battle

it out in this test of strength every year may have played a role in reducing

the violence of the island. So on Easter Island, the evidence seems to suggest

that there was no starvation. There was no widespread warfare. And so you might

be left asking, did their society even collapse at all? And the answer to that

is yes, but not when you think it did.

For early European explorers, there was no greater mystery than what they called

the riddle of Easter Island. The French seafarer and artist Pierre Lotti wrote

about it in the 19th century. There exists in the midst of the great ocean

in a region where nobody goes, a mysterious and isolated island. The

island is planted with monstrous great statues, the work of I don't know what

race, today degenerate or vanished. Its great remains an enigma. We've actually

encountered this kind of thinking a number of times over the course of this

series. When European explorers discovered the ruins of past

civilizations, they often found it hard to believe that so-called primitive

people had a hand in their construction. Whether it's assuming that the ruins of

Angkor were built by the Romans, or that the Mayan ruins of Tikal were built by

the citizens of Atlantis, European writers have often struggled to believe

that the indigenous people of other lands were capable of great

constructions. This kind of thinking follows a circular logic. Only a so-called

advanced civilization could have built these things, but the people I see living

here don't look like an advanced civilization, therefore these people

can't have built these monuments. The problems with this kind of thinking are

obvious. It deceives us into thinking that an advanced civilization can only

look like a European civilization, highly centralized and organized, and the very

notion of a society being advanced suggests that human progress follows a

fixed and inevitable path, and that our way of organizing our societies and

economies is the only one. It's this kind of thinking that made early explorers of

Easter Island look at the advanced rock mulching techniques of the Rapa Nui

people and see only a wasteland scattered with rocks. This belief system

found its logical conclusion in the Norwegian adventurer and archaeologist

Thor Heyerdahl. Heyerdahl believed that the Polynesian islands had been populated

not by Polynesians hopping the islands from the West, but from people from South

America traveling by raft from the East. He also believed, curiously, that these

people must have been white-skinned and European in origin. He simply couldn't

comprehend the idea that other peoples around the world could have developed

such artistic and architectural skills. So what appeared to be a puzzle to early

European visitors wasn't actually a puzzle at all. The stone statues of Easter

Island hadn't been built by some vanished ancient culture, but by the

people who lived there already and seemed to those Europeans to be so

simple. This idea of a societal collapse happening on Easter Island before

contact with the Europeans has survived into our day, even though it has very

little basis in fact. But this doesn't mean that a collapse didn't occur on

Rapa Nui. In fact, the island would soon undergo one of the most dramatic

examples of societal and cultural destruction that can be found in history.

But it wasn't because they cut down the trees. There is one event in Easter

Island's history that I think encapsulates the complete destruction

that would soon rain down on it and its poor unsuspecting inhabitants. That's the

toppling in only a few years of every one of the island's statues. For centuries

the islanders had loved and revered the Moai that their ancestors had spent

generations carving and transporting. And in 1722 the Dutch sailor Behrens

recounts what he saw of the islanders devotion to these statues. They kindle

fire in front of certain remarkably tall stone figures they set up, and

thereafter, squatting on their heels with heads bowed down, they bring the palms of

their hands together and alternately raise and lower them. But with every

subsequent European visitor to the island, this situation seemed to change.

On the 15th of November 1770, 48 years after the first European visit, a second

arrived. Two Spanish ships landed there and spent five days on the island,

performing a very thorough survey of its coast. They renamed the island Isla de

San Carlos and claimed it on behalf of King Charles III of Spain. They also

ceremoniously erected three wooden crosses and a Spanish flag on a hill.

When they explored the island, it seems that all of the 200 erected statues were

still standing. But four years later, the famous British explorer Captain Cook

sailed past the island and found a much different situation. Cook's diary of

Thursday the 17th of March 1774 gives his account of the impoverished state of

the island. This is undoubtedly the same island as was seen by Roggeveen in April

1722, although the description given of it by the author of that voyage does by

no means correspond with it now. No nation will ever contend for the honor

of the discovery of Easter Island, as there is hardly an island in this sea

which affords less refreshments and conveniences for shipping than it does.

Nature has hardly provided it with anything fit for man to eat or drink, and

the natives are but few and plant no more than sufficient for themselves. If

Cook's account is to be believed, the population size of Easter Island also

seems to have taken a serious hit. The inhabitants of this isle, from what we

have been able to see of them, do not exceed six or seven hundred souls. And

there's another significant detail too. Cook noted that the islanders now

carried weapons when approaching foreign visitors. Their arms are wooden

patapataus and clubs, very much like those of New Zealand, and spears about

six or eight feet long which are pointed at one end with pieces of black flint.

But the final tragic detail is that in the four years since the Spanish

expedition, virtually all of the standing Moai on the island had been toppled over.

On the east side, near the sea, they met with three platforms of stonework, or

rather, the ruins of them. On each had stood four of those large statues, but

they were all fallen down, all except one were broken by the fall or in some

measure defaced. The practice of statue toppling is called Huri Moau in the

Rapa Nui language and it continued into the 1830s. By 1838, every single coastal

Moai had been taken down. Now, the only standing statues were those abandoned on

the slopes below the quarry at Ranuraku. So, what happened to make the islanders

start to carry weapons? What caused their population to reduce so heavily?

And what made them turn so dramatically against their gods? Well, the answer to

that may lie in the very event that opened this episode and which we've

returned to a number of times. That's the arrival of three Dutch sails on the

horizon on Easter Day 1722.

At the sight of the enormous ships dropping anchor some way off the coast,

the Easter Islanders gathered on the shore in astonishment. They must have

felt how we would feel if a vast alien spaceship were to one day materialize

over one of our cities. It must have been a mix of fear and wonder, a sense

that the world would never quite be the same again. They selected one of their

number who must have been the bravest of them all. It's not unlikely, I think, that

he would have been the winner of the most recent Birdman competition, the

island's champion and protector. This man got in his canoe and rode out to meet

the strange vessels whose white sails must have looked brilliant and dazzling

in the sunlight. Perhaps he wouldn't have immediately realized how large they were

until he got up close and their prows began to loom over his small canoe. When

he approached, he saw that there were men on board and he waved to them. The Dutch

officer, Carl Friedrich Behrens, wrote about this incredible encounter.

But this light-hearted encounter conceals a dark truth about

Roggeveen's visit. In fact, when Roggeveen and his men went ashore, their visit

would turn to tragedy. It's clear from both accounts that the Europeans were

nervous when they stepped ashore. They had heard stories of violent encounters

with indigenous people and it's worth noting that the novel Robinson Crusoe

had been published only three years before, full of garish stories of

cannibalism and murder. Despite their guns and cannons, it's clear that the

islanders frightened them and the natural curiosity and boldness of the

Rapa Nui people seemed to make matters worse. When the Dutchmen got ashore, the

islanders pressed around them, grabbing at their hats and clothes and even

touching the guns they carried. It's not clear which Dutchman shot first, but the

situation quickly spiraled out of control. The Europeans fired into the

unarmed crowd of islanders. Their guns were flintlock pistols and rifles that

would have sent up puffs of smoke and the cries of people shot would have rang

out, with the smell of gunpowder filling the air. Behrens recounts what happened

next, as he recognized a familiar face among the murdered islanders.

Many of them were shot at this juncture and among the slain lay the man who had

been with us before, of which we were much grieved. In order to obtain

possession of the bodies, they congregated in great numbers, bringing

with them presents of various kinds of fruits and vegetables, in order that we

might the more readily surrender to them their slain. The consternation of these

people was by no means abated. Even with their children's children in that place

will, in times to come, be able to recount the story of it. We can assume that what

Behrens said is true. The story of this violent encounter must have reverberated

through the history of the Rapa Nui people. It would have destabilized their

ancient beliefs and rocked their very sense of the world around them. Remember

that Behrens mentions that the islanders didn't have any weapons at this point,

that they only prayed to their gods for protection. Now imagine what would happen

to this belief system when visitors arrived from the sea, killed multiple

islanders with what must have appeared to be magic weapons, and then when these

visitors walked around the island, even approaching the statues, and then sailed

away unharmed. When you think about this encounter through that lens, it becomes a

lot clearer why the Rapa Nui might have lost faith in their ancestors. But the

sad truth is that the European bullets were not the deadliest legacy they left

behind. The true killer of the Rapa Nui would have been something much smaller,

invisible microbes, viruses and bacteria to which the islanders' immune systems

had never been exposed.

Europe has always been a crossroads between many different peoples, sometimes

separated by hundreds or even thousands of miles. Europe's constant wars and

exchange of trade spread localized diseases across the continent. Each

year the Silk Road brought fresh shipments of disease from China and

India, along with silks and spices. This all resulted in Europeans becoming

immune to a large variety of diseases. But although the diseases didn't affect

them, they could still carry them, and for populations that had not suffered the

same exposure, these germs could be devastating. In pathology, this phenomenon

is known as the virgin soil effect. It's not recorded what diseases may have been

transmitted. In other parts of the uncontacted world, cholera, measles,

diphtheria and even the bubonic plague swept through populations. By even the

lowest estimates, indigenous populations were reduced by 80% right across the

Americas. Four out of every five people died and it's likely that in the even

more isolated environment of Easter Island, the effects could have been even

more devastating. On other better observed Polynesian islands, the

reduction in population after first contact was as much as 90%.

And so, in the decades after the Dutch visit, we can imagine disease ravaging

the helpless population of Rapa Nui. It's possible that the population of the

island may have crashed from a height of around 3,000 to only a few hundred.

The population may have only just recovered by the time 48 years later that

the Spanish arrived and delivered a whole new dose of invisible death to the

islanders. The Rapa Nui people wouldn't have been able to understand why this

was happening to them. In fact, if you'd asked the Europeans of the time what

caused these diseases, they wouldn't know either. They may have told you that

they were caused by miasmas or bad night air, this being the prevailing theory at

the time. As whole families of islanders died, the Rapa Nui must have believed

that the ancestors they had so laboriously carved to protect the island

had failed them. By the time the Spanish brought the second wave of disease and

it began ravaging the population all over again, those looming monoliths on

the coast may have begun to represent not protective spirits but the very

specters of death themselves. The islanders, one by one, began to bring

them down. Soon, these fallen giants would litter the landscape. Now, only those

abandoned Moai, half buried in the runoff from the quarry, would remain upright and

the age of Easter Island statues would come to an end.

The loss of Easter Island's culture was an incalculable tragedy for our

understanding of humanity. One of the reasons this is true is that Easter

Island may have been one of the few places on earth where writing was

independently invented. A kind of script called rongo-rongo has been found on

just a few dozen wooden objects and tablets that have survived from Rapa

Nui. Many of them are heavily weathered, burned or otherwise damaged and they

were all plundered by private collectors in the 19th century, now scattered in

museums and private collections around the world. Every modern attempt to

decipher rongo-rongo has failed and the script stands as one of the true

mysteries of Easter Island. Many of the glyphs that make up the script are

representations of things the islanders saw around them. We can see the familiar

shapes of sea turtles and birds, for instance. The legends of the islanders

say that the original founder, the man they called Hotumatua, had brought the

wooden tablets with him when he landed on Easter Island. But this seems

unlikely. There is no known tradition of writing anywhere else in Polynesia and

so it's thought that rongo-rongo must have been an invention of the islanders

themselves. It doesn't seem like literacy was ever widespread. In fact, early

visitors to the island were told that reading and writing was a privilege of

the ruling families and priests. Some have argued that rongo-rongo must be a

more modern invention, that the islanders may have seen Europeans reading and

writing, thus inspiring them to create their own script. If this were the case,

then the written language of rongo-rongo would have emerged, flourished and then

fallen into oblivion, all within a space of less than a hundred years. But I think

one detail of the script makes me doubt this. That's the character that shows

clearly and unambiguously the distinctive wine bottle shape of a

jubaea palm tree, a species that went extinct on the island before the year

1650, more than 70 years before first European contact. To my mind, this alone

shows that rongo-rongo was developed on the island during a time when giant palms

still towered over its shores. In 1864, a French churchman, Eugène Ayrault, arrived on

the island and described seeing a vast number of these writing tablets, although

it seemed to him that the islanders no longer valued them as repositories of

knowledge. In every hut, one finds wooden tablets or sticks covered in several

sorts of hieroglyphic characters. They are depictions of animals unknown on the

island which the natives draw with sharp stones. Each figure has its own name, but

the scant attention they pay to these tablets leads me to think that these

characters, remnants of some primitive writing, are now for them a habitual

practice which they keep without seeking its meaning. European visitors in the

following decades reported seeing the islanders using these writing tablets as

reels for their fishing lines and as tools for fire-starting. By this time,

none of the islanders could agree on how to read the tablets. Whatever knowledge

was held in the rongo-rongo script, the destruction of the island society had

caused it to be lost. If attempts at deciphering it continue to be

unsuccessful, we may never know what the Rapa Nui people wrote down. This