Better Treatment, Better Care (8)
your hospitals and you can choose to go to the hospital on the north side but
everybody knows that hospital charges more and serves the worst food in town
but their medical outcomes are no different than the hospital on the east
side of town that has great food and really looks after their patients and
has a concierge at the front door it's a medicare card taking you to either of
them for exactly the same amount of copay based on what the government is
requiring where would you go as a patient
immediately it changes behavior and i think we under appreciate the the power
of competition in that world well i'm a foodie so you i would
definitely go to the one with the better food let me um i don't want to get too
far down this track we could probably do another whole segment on it but
you've clearly articulated i think why it is the canada health act prevents us
from moving in the direction of some of the more successful universal systems
what i find astounding is that we're now talking about the federal government in
canada taking over more of the
delivery or management of health services that have been in the
provincial domain the discussion of a national pharmacare program for instance
the discussion of a national long-term care approach for instance as after
having this conversation with you i don't want the federal government to go
anywhere near those and so so tell me tell me why this is though like what is
the enticement for thinking that the federal government has all the solutions
when clearly you've just um you've just demonstrated the federal government in
this case is the problem i think the federal government has very
few solutions this is this is politics and this this is is purely politics
healthcare is the third rail i think uh premier klein and alberta many many
years ago said it is always politically expedient to wrap yourself in a flag and
proclaim yourself the defender of medicare i suppose it's just as
expedient to say you're going to be the expander of medicare
we know the federal government is only involved in healthcare as
as a function of the federal spending power
it is taxing more than it needs for its own needs and then or for its own
responsibilities i should say and then transferring those money to that money
to provinces under a certain set of terms and conditions
we could just get the federal government out of it and leave the provinces to
decide because it is their constitutional responsibility it's in
their under the constitution healthcare's
provincial jurisdiction exclusively for decision making
and and let's not forget what roy romano said if you got in a car and drove from
the tip of newfoundland to victoria you go through 10 very different provinces
with 10 different economic realities with 10 different demographic realities
these are 10 provinces that need 10 different policy constructs for
healthcare a one-size-fits-all solution from ottawa is counter-productive it it
one moves decision-making further away from the people who are voting for
government which means we now come into these federal dynamics where ontario and
quebec determine what the federal government wants for places as distant
as newfoundland and british columbia as opposed to populations that are
voting for their premier and their province with their own construct
i think we could take some great lessons from from welfare reform in the 1990s
where provinces were given a free hand they were given open transfers the rules
were taken off and the provinces were given the opportunity to innovate in
reform some did some didn't and they're responsible to their own populations for
that so some systems work better now than others but the provinces can also
learn from one another it's a lot easier for bc to learn from saskatchewan than
it is for ontario to learn from switzerland
we're right next door we can see what's happening we can study it we can travel
quickly and easily i i think there's great magic in having the federal
government get out of the business of health care led it back to the provinces
who are directly responsible populations i don't understand what the federal
government would bring to the table that the provincial government doesn't other
than the ability to tax the entire nation and transfer money to germany
well we should all be wanting to get better outcomes so totally agree with
you let me ask you uh just in sort of our final moments here we so we do have
we whenever we're doing our comparisons we do talk about
nation to nation but as you pointed out we've got we've got 10 different health
care systems more if you include the territories as well but looking at the
10 provinces are you seeing any glimmers of hope
you've identified pretty clearly the things that a province needs to do to
move in a direction of a higher functioning system that gives better
outcome at lower cost where are the bright lights in canada what provinces
are are leading on this front or is the canada health act and the federal
spending power and the threat of losing those dollars so overwhelming that
nobody's really been prepared to stick their neck out
we have seen some tweaks and some changes across the provinces over time
and certainly even within the restrictions of the canada health act
some some policy options are available activity-based funding is as far as the
letter of the canada health act is concerned entirely canada health have
compliance we could change the way we fund hospitals tomorrow
and unless the federal government really wanted to raise section 12 about
reasonable access it's okay under the letter of the candidate health act cost
sharing clearly not private competitive provision of hospital services under the
letter allowed permissible private parallel health care under the letter of
the canada health act allowed there's actually nothing in the canada health
act that says you cannot have a private parallel healthcare system there's
nothing explicit but again section 12 reasonable access rears its ugly head
fairly routinely but if we look across the provinces we have provinces that
have innovated we have saskatchewan which created a central registry for
waiting lists one approach but then they used the private sector to bring the
waiting list down and embrace that approach and they made a meaningful
impact on their waiting list we've seen initiatives in alberta pilot projects
small projects but they've happened in the devon and joint
approach where we used a private facility here in calgary and again
brought the waiting list down quebec has traditionally performed a little bit
better than the other provinces on waiting lists historically and it's a
little more of a european-style healthcare system there's there's a
little more activity there they have that private parallel sector now since
shoguly it's very limited very restricted but they haven't exploded and
got worse waiting times i think that when we look across the nation
when we're trying to pick a winner among the provinces we're trying to pick a bad
apple out of a batch of really bad apples there's really no great
healthcare system in this province even in this country there's really no great
province even in the very best province in this country we are finding waiting
lists that are longer than that in longer than those in any number of other
developed nations national surveys show that canadians wait longer as a nation
than people do in other developed nations around the world we have some of
the longest waiting us for access to care according to the commonwealth fund
so as much as we want to find a provincial example i think we've had
some great experiments we've had a great activity-based funding experiment in bc
that never really turned into anything
massive we had a great experiment in saskatchewan where the private sector
helped reduce waiting lists entirely in line with the experience of countries
like spain and portugal we have yet to see a province say okay this isn't
working federal government you've got to get on board with this because we're
wasting taxpayer dollars we're not looking after patients properly let's do
a sweden let's let's just move beyond this this model let's understand that we
are going to be a better universal system if we reform because we're really
not doing universality well today let me ask you one other concept that you've
written about before that is really stuck in my mind and you alluded to it
earlier is one of the other things that we need to think about is how we have a
purchaser provider
and evaluator split so right now we have the same group that is providing the
service is the group that's given the money to fund the service which is the
group that then oversees the evaluation of how well the service is doing so is
it any wonder we don't have hospital report cards and is it any wonder that
we don't have a hole springing up the surgical suites that are independent of
that system that would hive off some of those dollars so
would any of that structural change be um be disallowed
under our canada health act could you have they're called different things in
different provinces but a health quality council that has the authority to do
genuine real health audits and evaluations and report cards and it's
serious could you then also have a separate spending authority and they
make the decision yeah we'll give money to a private hospital or a public
hospital or a non-profit or a charitable organization but we decide and then you
could still have the traditional services that are run by government run
under the same umbrella but they wouldn't be making those other two
decisions that's sort of how i've been thinking about the structural change
that's needed but is there anything that would be a barrier to that number one
and is there any place where they do that particularly well that we should be
emulating uh i think we can look to germany for
for the great example there's nothing in the canada health effect that would stop
a purchase for provider split again in the letter of the canada health act
section 12 always removes its ugly head but section 12 could be used to stop the
delivery of hamburgers i mean it's that big
when it comes to the purchase of provider split
i think it's a very important part of activity-based funding and a very
important add-on and it is about getting government to where government needs to
be not necessarily where government is the
less efficient provider and where the private sector can play a stronger role
the private sector is a great insurer the private sector is a great provider
they're great at looking after patients the private sector is perhaps less good
when it comes to ensuring that everybody has access to a health care system on
equal terms because that's the role of government
and we need somebody to look after the system and police it and ensure that
things are being done properly and you're absolutely right when you say
government today in canada is the payer the provider and the monitor so when
they pay for care that isn't delivered properly they're the ones who go and
slap themselves on the wrist that is a horrendous conflict of interest whereas
in a country like germany government ensures everybody has access it's a
swiss style health care system where there is private insurers within the
public system government ensures everybody has access to the health care
system or at least the insurance system that's their role they then ensure that