×

LingQ'yu daha iyi hale getirmek için çerezleri kullanıyoruz. Siteyi ziyaret ederek, bunu kabul edersiniz: cookie policy.


image

Atheism, The Real God: An Epiphany

The Real God: An Epiphany

Theresa is attracted to Anthony. She asks Anthony out on a date. Anthony isn't interested maybe he isn't attracted to her or he's married. For whatever reason he declines. Was Theresa rejected? Yes. When someone is rejected they're prone to feel despair and frustration. Typically she'll feel resentment and anger toward Anthony. The rejection affected the dopamine and cortisol activity in her brain which can actually cause physical pain.Some short-term effects of this rejection are aggressiveness and anti-social behavior. This type of emotional reaction can also explain why atheists are one of the most hated groups of people. Teresa is a theist and a billboard reminded her that atheists exist, or perhaps Teresa discovered that her acquaintance Anthony is an atheist, or Teresa is in an argument with Anthony about the existence of God. Any one of these things can cause Teresa to feel despair and frustration. Typically she'll feel resentment and anger toward Anthony. Because of this she may even exhibit aggressiveness and anti-social behavior. As you can see there is a fascinating parallel between the typical reaction of someone who is romantically rejected and the typical reaction of a theist who encounters an atheist. But the parallel is practically shouted from the rooftops as the theist actually describes the atheists disbelief as rejection, the atheist rejects God they say. It is no coincidence that the theist chooses the word rejection because there is a disconnect between the inaccurate use of the word rejection to describe the atheists position and the theists reaction which coincides with the exact same symptoms of rejection, thereby compelling them to use that word even though it's inaccurate. The inaccuracy can be easily seen from the romantic perspective, the analogy would look like this: Teresa tries to set Anthony up on a blind date with Gloria. Anthony doesn't think that Teresa even knows Gloria or that she's acting as an agent on Gloria's behalf. Did Anthony actually reject Gloria? No. What if Anthony doesn't even believe that Gloria exists? Perhaps Teresa described her as being too attractive, described her personality as too perfect to be believable. So if Anthony doesn't believe Gloria actually exists, did he reject her even if she does exist? No. All Gloria would need to do is show up and ask Anthony in person for him to accept, or perhaps Teresa described Gloria inaccurately. Is Anthony rejecting the real Gloria or the inaccurate portrayal of Gloria which doesn't actually exist even though she does? In all accounts Anthony is not actually rejecting Gloria and in all accounts Teresa would have no reason to feel rejected at all. So why then does the theist typically show the classic signs of rejection and even misuse the word rejection when encountering an atheist? Because Gloria is Teresa, the believer is God. Your relationship with God is actually a profound dynamic relationship with *thee self with your ego. It is why God knows you so well, it is why his opinions are so often your opinions and why a different believer of the same God as yours can claim that he agrees with God's opinions but not yours. It is why God can seem so very real to you because he is real, he is you. And believer before you deny this, ask yourself are you truly in a position to be able to deny it?

This confusion of skepticism with rejection has caused the persistence of Christianity's fundamental flaw,a foundational flaw that has fatally detrimental implications for the religion. The religion itself is based on a false dichotomy, the notion that you must either choose God or reject him. But belief is not a choice, it's a compulsion beyond the realm of choice achieved through convincing arguments evidence and Trust. I do not choose what I believe because I perceive it as the more attractive option, I'm compelled to believe what I think is true whether I like it or not, because desirability is not a requisite of the truth. This takes honest introspection to truly make a choice. I must clearly be given the option if I can doubt whether the option even exists, then the option hasn't been clearly presented to me thereby preventing me from being able to make a choice. An omniscient God would easily see this flaw in his system but God isn't omniscient, he only seems that way because somehow someway he knows exactly how to answer your doubts; he knows exactly how you think and if you are paying attention then you'd know exactly why that is


The Real God: An Epiphany Справжній Бог: Прозріння

Theresa is attracted to Anthony. Theresa Anthony'ye çekiyor. She asks Anthony out on a date. Anthony'den bir randevu çıkmasını ister. Anthony isn't interested maybe he isn't attracted to her or he's married. Anthony isn't interested maybe he isn't attracted to her or he's married. For whatever reason he declines. Sebebi ne olursa olsun reddediyor. Was Theresa rejected? Theresa reddetti mi? Yes. When someone is rejected they're prone to feel despair and frustration. Birisi reddedildiğinde, umutsuzluk ve hayal kırıklığı hissetmeye eğilimlidirler. Typically she'll feel resentment and anger toward Anthony. Tipik olarak Anthony'ye karşı kızgınlık ve öfke hisseder. The rejection affected the dopamine and cortisol activity in her brain which can actually cause physical pain.Some short-term effects of this rejection are aggressiveness and anti-social behavior. This type of emotional reaction can also explain why atheists are one of the most hated groups of people. Bu tür duygusal tepki, ateistlerin neden en nefret edilen insan gruplarından biri olduğunu da açıklayabilir. Teresa is a theist and a billboard reminded her that atheists exist, or perhaps Teresa discovered that her acquaintance Anthony is an atheist, or Teresa is in an argument with Anthony about the existence of God. Teresa bir ateist ve bir pano, ateistlerin var olduğunu hatırlattı, ya da Teresa, Anthony'nin ateist olduğu ya da Teresa'nın, Tanrı'nın varlığı hakkında Anthony ile tartıştığı bir olay olduğunu keşfetti. Any one of these things can cause Teresa to feel despair and frustration. Bunlardan herhangi biri, Teresa'nın umutsuzluk ve hayal kırıklığı hissetmesine neden olabilir. Typically she'll feel resentment and anger toward Anthony. Because of this she may even exhibit aggressiveness and anti-social behavior. As you can see there is a fascinating parallel between the typical reaction of someone who is romantically rejected and the typical reaction of a theist who encounters an atheist. Gördüğünüz gibi, romantik olarak reddedilen birinin tipik tepkisi ile ateistle karşılaşan bir terapistin tipik tepkisi arasında büyüleyici bir paralel var. But the parallel is practically shouted from the rooftops as the theist actually describes the atheists disbelief as rejection, the atheist rejects God they say. Fakat ateist, ateistlerin reddettiklerini ateist olarak kabul ettikleri için, ateistlerin inançsızlığı inançsız olarak nitelendirmesiyle birlikte, paralel olarak çatılardan çıkarılır. It is no coincidence that the theist chooses the word rejection because there is a disconnect between the inaccurate use of the word rejection to describe the atheists position and the theists reaction which coincides with the exact same symptoms of rejection, thereby compelling them to use that word even though it's inaccurate. Hıristiyanın reddi kelimesini seçmesi tesadüf değildir, çünkü reddi kelimesinin yanlış kullanımı arasında ateistler pozisyonunu ve aynı reddetme belirtileriyle çakışan theists reaksiyonunu açıklamak arasında bir kopukluk vardır, dolayısıyla bu kelimeyi kullanmaya zorlar. yanlış olsa da. The inaccuracy can be easily seen from the romantic perspective, the analogy would look like this: Teresa tries to set Anthony up on a blind date with Gloria. Yanlışlık romantik perspektiften kolayca görülebilir, benzetme şöyle görünür: Teresa Anthony'yi Gloria ile kör bir tarihte kurmaya çalışır. Anthony doesn't think that Teresa even knows Gloria or that she's acting as an agent on Gloria's behalf. Anthony, Teresa'nın Gloria'yı bile bildiğini veya Gloria'nın adına bir ajan olarak davrandığını düşünmüyor. Did Anthony actually reject Gloria? No. What if Anthony doesn't even believe that Gloria exists? Ya Anthony, Gloria'nın olduğuna inanmıyorsa? Perhaps Teresa described her as being too attractive, described her personality as too perfect to be believable. Belki Teresa onu çok çekici olarak tanımladı, kişiliğini inandırıcı olmak için çok mükemmel olarak nitelendirdi. So if Anthony doesn't believe Gloria actually exists, did he reject her even if she does exist? Eğer Anthony, Gloria'nın gerçekten var olduğuna inanmazsa, var olsa bile onu reddetti mi? No. All Gloria would need to do is show up and ask Anthony in person for him to accept, or perhaps Teresa described Gloria inaccurately. Gloria'nın yapması gereken şey, Anthony'nin kendisini kabul etmesini istemek, belki de Teresa'nın Gloria'yı yanlış bir şekilde tanımlamasını istemesidir. Is Anthony rejecting the real Gloria or the inaccurate portrayal of Gloria which doesn't actually exist even though she does? Anthony gerçek Gloria'yı ya da Gloria'nın gerçekte olduğu halde gerçekte var olmayan yanlış portresini reddediyor mu? In all accounts Anthony is not actually rejecting Gloria and in all accounts Teresa would have no reason to feel rejected at all. Tüm hesaplarda Anthony aslında Gloria'yı reddetmiyor ve tüm hesaplarda Teresa'nın reddedilmiş hissetme konusunda hiçbir nedenleri olmayacaktı. So why then does the theist typically show the classic signs of rejection and even misuse the word rejection when encountering an atheist? Öyleyse neden bu tipik olarak klasik reddetme belirtileri gösteriyor ve hatta ateistle karşılaşıldığında reddedilmeyi reddediyor? Because Gloria is Teresa, the believer is God. Gloria Gloria olduğundan, inanan Tanrı'dır. Your relationship with God is actually a profound dynamic relationship with *thee self with your ego. Tanrı ile ilişkiniz, aslında benliğinizle özdeş bir dinamik ilişkidir. It is why God knows you so well, it is why his opinions are so often your opinions and why a different believer of the same God as yours can claim that he agrees with God's opinions but not yours. Bu yüzden Tanrı sizi çok iyi tanıyor, bu yüzden onun fikirlerinin çoğu kez sizin görüşleriniz olduğu ve aynı Tanrı'nın sizin gibi farklı bir inancının Tanrı'nın fikirleriyle aynı görüşte olduğunu ancak sizinkiyle aynı fikirde olmadığını iddia edebiliyor. It is why God can seem so very real to you because he is real, he is you. Bu yüzden Tanrı, sizin için çok gerçek görünebilir, çünkü o gerçek, sizsiniz. And believer before you deny this, ask yourself are you truly in a position to be able to deny it? Ve bunu inkar etmeden önce, kendinize, onu inkar edebilecek bir konumda olduğunuzu sorun.

This confusion of skepticism with rejection has caused the persistence of Christianity's fundamental flaw,a foundational flaw that has fatally detrimental implications for the religion. Şüpheciliğin reddedilme ile ilgili bu karışıklığı, Hıristiyanlığın temel kusurunun, dine yönelik ölümcül sonuçlara yol açan temel bir kusurun sürmesine neden olmuştur. The religion itself is based on a false dichotomy, the notion that you must either choose God or reject him. Dinin kendisi yanlış bir dikotomiye dayanır, ya Tanrı'yı ​​seçmeniz ya da onu reddetmeniz gerektiği fikri. But belief is not a choice, it's a compulsion beyond the realm of choice achieved through convincing arguments evidence and Trust. Fakat inanç bir seçim değildir, inandırıcı argümanlar kanıtı ve Güven ile elde edilen seçim alanının ötesinde bir zorlamadır. I do not choose what I believe because I perceive it as the more attractive option, I'm compelled to believe what I think is true whether I like it or not, because desirability is not a requisite of the truth. Neyi inandığımı seçmiyorum çünkü onu daha çekici bir seçenek olarak algılıyorum, ister beğenip beğenmediğimi düşündüğümün doğru olduğuna inanıyorum çünkü arzu edilebilirlik gerçekliğin bir gereği değildir. This takes honest introspection to truly make a choice. Bu gerçekten bir seçim yapmak için dürüst bir içgüdüye kavuşur. I must clearly be given the option if I can doubt whether the option even exists, then the option hasn't been clearly presented to me thereby preventing me from being able to make a choice. Opsiyonun mevcut olup olmadığından şüphe edebilmem gerekirse, açıkça seçmeliyim, o zaman seçenek bana açık bir şekilde sunulmadı ve böylece bir seçim yapmamı engelledi. An omniscient God would easily see this flaw in his system but God isn't omniscient, he only seems that way because somehow someway he knows exactly how to answer your doubts; he knows exactly how you think and if you are paying attention then you'd know exactly why that is Her şeye kadir bir Tanrı, bu kusurunu kendi sisteminde kolayca görebilecekti, ama Tanrı her şeye kadir değil, o sadece öyle görünüyor; çünkü bir şekilde, şüphelerinize nasıl cevap vereceğini tam olarak bilir; Tam olarak nasıl düşündüğünüzü biliyor ve dikkat ediyorsanız, bunun neden olduğunu tam olarak biliyorsunuzdur.