×

Ми використовуємо файли cookie, щоб зробити LingQ кращим. Відвідавши сайт, Ви погоджуєтесь з нашими правилами обробки файлів «cookie».

image

TEDTalks, Robert Wright – How cooperation (eventually) trumps conflict (2006)

Robert Wright – How cooperation (eventually) trumps conflict (2006)

I've got apparently 18 minutes to convince you that history has a direction -- an arrow.

That in some fundamental sense, it's good; that the arrow points to something positive. Now, when the TED people first approached me about giving this upbeat talk -- (Laughter) -- that was before the cartoon of Muhammad had triggered global rioting. It was before the avian flu had reached Europe. It was before Hamas had won the Palestinian election, eliciting various counter-measures by Israel. And to be honest, if I had known when I was asked to give this upbeat talk that even as I was giving the upbeat talk, the apocalypse would be unfolding -- (Laughter) -- I might have said, "Is it okay if I talk about something else?" But I didn't, OK. So we're here. I'll do what I can.

I'll do what I can.

I've got to warn you: the sense in which my worldview is upbeat has always been kind of subtle, sometimes even elusive. (Laughter) The sense in which I can be uplifting and inspiring -- I mean, there's always been a kind of a certain grim dimension to the way I try to uplift, so if grim inspiration -- (Laughter) -- if grim inspiration is not a contradiction in terms, that is, I'm afraid, the most you can hope for. OK, today -- that's if I succeed. I'll see what I can do. OK?

Now, in one sense, the claim that history has a direction is not that controversial. If you're just talking about social structure, OK, clearly that's gotten more complex a little over the last 10 thousand years -- has reached higher and higher levels. And in fact, that's actually sustaining a long-standing trend that predates human beings, OK, that biological evolution was doing for us. Because what happened in the beginning, this stuff encases itself in a cell, then cells start hanging out together in societies. Eventually they get so close, they form multicellular organisms, then you get complex multicellular organisms; they form societies.

But then at some point, one of these multicellular organisms does something completely amazing with its stuff, which is it launches a whole second kind of evolution: cultural evolution. And amazingly, that evolution sustains the trajectory that biological evolution had established toward greater complexity. By cultural evolution we mean the evolution of ideas. A lot of you have heard the term "memes." The evolution of technology, I pay a lot of attention to, so, you know, one of the first things you got was a little hand axe. Generations go by, somebody says, hey, why don't we put it on a stick? (Laughter) Just absolutely delights the little ones. Next best thing to a video game.

This may not seem to impress, but technological evolution is progressive, so another 10, 20,000 years, and armaments technology takes you here. (Laughter) Impressive. And the rate of technological evolution speeds up, so a mere quarter of a century after this, you get this, OK. (Laughter) And this. (Laughter) I'm sorry -- it was a cheap laugh, but I wanted to find a way to transition back to this idea of the unfolding apocalypse, and I thought that might do it. (Applause)

OK.

So, what threatens to happen with this unfolding apocalypse, is the collapse of global social organization. Now, first let me remind you how much work it took to get us where we are, to be on the brink of true global social organization. Originally, you had the most complex societies, the hunter-gatherer village. Stonehenge is the remnant of a chiefdom, which is what you get with the invention of agriculture: multi-village polity with centralized rule. With the invention of writing, you start getting cities. This is blurry. I kind of like that because it makes it look like a one-celled organism and reminds you how many levels organic organization has already moved through to get to this point. And then you get to, you know, you get empires.

I want to stress, you know, social organization can transcend political bounds. This is the Silk Road connecting the Chinese Empire and the Roman Empire. So you had social complexity spanning the whole continent, even if no polity did similarly. Today, you've got nation states. Point is, there's obviously collaboration and organization going on beyond national bounds. This is actually just a picture of the earth at night, and I'm just putting it up because I think it's pretty. Does kind of convey the sense that this is an integrated system.

OK.

Now, I explained this growth of complexity by reference to something called non-zero sumness. Assuming that a few of you did not do the assigned reading, very quickly, the key idea is the distinction between zero-sum games, in which correlations are inverse: always a winner and a loser. Non-zero-sum games in which correlations can be positive, OK. So like in tennis, usually it's win-lose, it always adds up to zero-zero-sum, but if you're playing doubles, the person on your side of the net, they're in the same boat as you, so you're playing a non-zero-sum game with them. It's either for the better or for the worse, OK. A lot of forms of non-zero-sum behavior in the realm of economics and so on in everyday life often leads to cooperation.

The argument I make is basically that, well, non-zero-sum games have always been part of life. You have them in hunter-gatherer societies, but then through technological evolution, new forms of technology arise that facilitate or encourage the playing of non-zero-sum games, involving more people over larger territory. Social structure adapts to accommodate this possibility and to harness this productive potential, so you get cities, you know, and you get all the non-zero-sum games you don't think about that are being played across the world. Like, have you ever thought when you buy a car, how many people on how many different continents contributed to the manufacture of that car? Those are people in effect you're playing a non-zero-sum game with. I mean, there are certainly plenty of them around.

Now, this sounds like an intrinsically upbeat worldview in a way, because when you think of non-zero, you think win-win, you know, that's good. Well, there are a few reasons that actually it's not intrinsically upbeat. First of all, it can accommodate: it doesn't deny the existence of inequality exploitation war. But there's a more fundamental reason that it's not intrinsically upbeat, because a non-zero-sum game, all it tells you for sure is that the fortunes will be correlated for better or worse. It doesn't necessarily predict a win-win outcome.

So, in a way, the question is, on what grounds am I upbeat at all about history? And the answer is, first of all, on balance I would say people have played their games to more win-win outcomes than lose-lose outcomes. On balance, I think history is a net positive in the non-zero-sum game department. And a testament to this is the thing that most amazes me, most impresses me, and most uplifts me, which is that there is a moral dimension to history, there is a moral arrow. We have seen moral progress over time.

2,500 years ago, members of one Greek city state considered members of another Greek city state subhuman and treated them that way. And then this moral revolution arrived, and they decided that actually, no, Greeks are human beings. It's just the Persians who aren't fully human and don't deserve to be treated very nicely.

But this was progress -- you know, give them credit. And now today, we've seen more progress. I think -- I hope -- most people here would say that all people everywhere are human beings, deserve to be treated decently, unless they do something horrendous, regardless of race or religion. And you have to read your ancient history to realize what a revolution that has been, OK. This was not a prevalent view, few thousand years ago, and I attribute it to this non-zero-sum dynamic. I think that's the reason there is as much tolerance toward nationalities, ethnicities, religions, as there is today, you know. If you asked me, you know, why am I not in favor of bombing Japan, well, I'm only half-joking when I say they built my car, OK. We have this non-zero-sum relationship, and I think that does lead to a kind of a tolerance to the extent that you realize that someone else's welfare is positively correlated with yours. You're more likely to cut them a break.

I kind of think this is a kind of a business-class morality. Unfortunately, I don't fly trans-Atlantic business class often enough to know, or any other kind of business class really. But I assume that in business class, you don't hear many expressions of, you know, bigotry about racial groups or ethnic groups, because the people who are flying trans-Atlantic business class are doing business with all these people; they're making money off of all these people. And I really do think that in that sense at least, capitalism has been a constructive force, and more fundamentally, it's a non-zero-sumness that has been a constructive force in expanding people's realm of moral awareness, OK. I think the non-zero-sum dynamic, which is not only economic by any means -- it's not always commerce -- but it has driven us to the verge of a moral truth, which is the fundamental equality of everyone. It has done that. As it has moved global, moved us toward a global level of social organization it has driven us toward moral truth. I think that's wonderful.

Now, back to the unfolding apocalypse. And you may wonder, OK, that's all fine, sounds great -- moral direction in history -- but what about this so-called clash of civilizations? Well, first of all, I would emphasize that it fits into the non-zero-sum framework, OK. If you look at the relationship between the so-called Muslim world and Western world -- two terms I don't like, but can't really avoid -- in such a short span of time, they're efficient if nothing else. It is non-zero-sum. And by that I mean, if people in the Muslim world get more hateful, more resentful, less happy with their place in the world, it'll be bad for the West. If they get more happy, it'll be good for the West. So that is a non-zero-sum dynamic.

And I would say the non-zero-sum dynamic is only going to grow more intense over time because of technological trends, but more intense in a kind of negative way. It's the down-side correlation of their fortunes that will become more and more possible. And one reason is because of something I call the growing lethality of hatred. More and more, it's possible for grassroots hatred abroad to manifest itself in the form of organized violence on American soil. And that's pretty new, and I think it's probably going to get a lot worse -- this capacity -- because of transient information technology, in technologies that can be used for purposes of munitions like biotechnology and nanotechnology. We may be hearing more about that today.

And there's something I worry about especially, which is that, this dynamic will lead to a kind of a feedback cycle that puts us on a slippery slope. What I have in mind is: terrorism happens here; we overreact to it. That, you know, we're not sufficiently surgical in our retaliation leads to more hatred abroad, more terrorism. We overreact because being human, we feel like retaliating, and it gets worse and worse and worse. You could call this the positive feedback of negative vibes, but I think in something so spooky, we really shouldn't have the word positive there at all, even in a technical sense. So let's call it the death spiral of negativity. (Laughter) I assure you if it happens, at the end, both the West and the Muslim world will have suffered. OK.

So, what do we do? Well, first of all, we can do a lot more with arms control, the international regulation of dangerous technologies. I have a whole global governance sermon that I will spare you right now, because I don't think that's going to be enough anyway, although it's essential. I think we're going to have to have a major round of moral progress in the world. I think you're just going to have to see less hatred among groups, less bigotry, and, you know, racial groups, religious groups, whatever. I've got to admit I feel silly saying that. It sounds so kind of Pollyannaish. I feel like Rodney King, you know, saying, why can't we all just get along? But A: I don't really see any alternative, given the way I read the situation. There's going to have to be moral progress, OK. There's going to have to be a lessening of the amount of hatred in the world, given how dangerous it's becoming. In my defense, I'd say, as naive as this may sound, it's ultimately grounded in cynicism.

That is to say -- (Laughter) -- thank you, thank you. That is to say, remember: my whole view of morality is that it boils down to self-interest. It's when people's fortunes are correlated. It's when your welfare conduces to mine, that I decide, oh yeah, I'm all in favor of your welfare. That's what's responsible for this growth of this moral progress so far, and I'm saying we once again have a correlation of fortunes. And if people respond to it intelligently, we will see the development of tolerance and so on -- the norms that we need, you know. We will see the further evolution of this kind of business-class morality.

So, these two things, you know, if they get people's attention and drive home the positive correlation and people do what's in their self-interests, which is further the moral evolution, then they could actually have a constructive effect. And that's why I lump growing lethality of hatred and death spiral of negativity under the general rubric: reasons to be cheerful. (Laughter) Doing the best I can, okay. (Laughter) I never called myself Mr. Uplift. I'm just doing what I can here. (Laughter)

Now, launching a moral revolution has got to be hard, right? I mean, what do you do? And I think the answer is a lot of different people are going to have to do a lot of different things. We all start where we are. Speaking as an American who has children whose security 10, 20, 30 years down the road I worry about -- what I personally want to start out doing is figuring out why so many people around the world hate us, OK. I think that's a worthy research project myself. I also like it because it's an intrinsically kind of morally redeeming exercise, Because to understand why somebody in a very different culture does something -- somebody you're kind of viewing as alien -- who's doing things you consider strange in a culture you consider strange, to really understand why they do the things they do is a morally redeeming accomplishment because you've got to relate their experience to yours. To really understand it, you've got to say, "Oh, I get it. So when they feel resentful, it's kind of like the way I feel resentful when this happens, and for somewhat the same reasons." That's true understanding. And I think that is an expansion of your moral compass when you manage to do that.

It's especially hard to do when people hate you, OK, because you don't really want to completely understand why people hate you. I mean, you want to hear the reason, but you don't want to be able to relate to it. You don't want it to make sense, right? You don't want to say, "Well, yeah, I can kind of understand how a human being in those circumstances would hate the country I live in." That's not a pleasant thing, but I think it's something that we're going to have to get used to and

work on. Now, I want to stress that to understand, you know, there are people who don't like this whole business of understanding the grassroots, the root causes of things; they don't want to know why people hate us. I want to understand it. The reason you're trying to understand why they hate us, is to get them to quit hating us, OK. The idea when you go through this moral exercise of really coming to appreciate their humanity and better understand them, is part of an effort to get them to appreciate your humanity in the long run. I think it's the first step toward that. That's the long-term goal.

There are people who worry about this, and in fact, I myself, apparently, was denounced on national TV a couple of nights ago because of an op-ed I'd written. It was kind of along these lines, and the allegation was that I have, quote, "affection for terrorists." Now, the good news is that the person who said it was Ann Coulter, OK. (Laughter) (Applause) I mean, if you've got to have an enemy, do make it Ann Coulter. (Laughter) But it's not a crazy concern, OK, because understanding behavior can lead to a kind of empathy, and it can make it a little harder to deliver tough love, and so on. But I think we're a lot closer to erring on the side of not comprehending the situation clearly enough, than in comprehending it so clearly that we just can't, you know, get the army out to kill terrorists.

So I'm not really worried about it. So -- (Laughter) -- I mean, we're going to have to work on a lot of fronts, OK, but if we succeed -- if we succeed -- then once again, non-zero-sumness and the recognition of non-zero-sum dynamics will have forced us to a higher moral level. And a kind of saving higher moral level, something that kind of literally saves the world. If you look at the word salvation in the Bible -- the Christian usage that we're familiar with, saving souls, that people go to heaven -- that's actually a latecomer. The original meaning of the word salvation in the Bible is about saving the social system. "Yahweh is our Savior," means "He has saved the nation of Israel," which at the time, was a pretty high-level social organization. Now, social organization has reached the global level, and I guess, if there's good news I can say I'm bringing you, it's just that all the salvation of the world requires is the intelligent pursuit of self-interests in a disciplined and careful way. It's going to be hard. I say we give it a shot anyway because we've just come too far to screw it up now. Thanks. (Applause)

http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_wright_on_optimism.html

Learn languages from TV shows, movies, news, articles and more! Try LingQ for FREE

Robert Wright – How cooperation (eventually) trumps conflict (2006) |||||übertrifft| Robert Wright - Wie Kooperation (letztendlich) den Konflikt übertrumpft (2006) Robert Wright - Cómo la cooperación (con el tiempo) triunfa sobre el conflicto (2006) Robert Wright - Come la cooperazione (alla fine) vince sul conflitto (2006) ロバート・ライト - 協力はいかにして(最終的に)争いに打ち勝つか(2006年) Robert Wright - Jak współpraca (ostatecznie) pokonuje konflikt (2006) Robert Wright - Como a cooperação (eventualmente) supera o conflito (2006) Роберт Райт - Как сотрудничество (в конечном итоге) побеждает конфликт (2006) Robert Wright - İşbirliği (eninde sonunda) çatışmayı nasıl yener (2006) 罗伯特·赖特 – 合作如何(最终)战胜冲突 (2006) 羅伯特·賴特 – 合作如何(最終)戰勝衝突 (2006)

I’ve got apparently 18 minutes to convince you that history has a direction -- an arrow. ||seemingly|||persuade||||||||direction trajectory path |||||||||||||strzała

That in some fundamental sense, it’s good; that the arrow points to something positive. |||basic|||||||||| Now, when the TED people first approached me about giving this upbeat talk -- (Laughter) -- that was before the cartoon of Muhammad had triggered global rioting. ||||||ansprachen|||||optimistische||Lachen|||||||Muhammad||||Unruhen ||||||contacted me|||||positive||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||disturbios ||||||||||||||||||||||||zamachy uliczne Als die TED-Leute zum ersten Mal an mich herantraten, um diesen aufmunternden Vortrag zu halten - (Gelächter) - war das, bevor die Mohammed-Karikatur weltweite Unruhen ausgelöst hatte. It was before the avian flu had reached Europe. ||||Vogel-|||| ||||bird|||| Das war, bevor die Vogelgrippe Europa erreicht hatte. It was before Hamas had won the Palestinian election, eliciting various counter-measures by Israel. |||||||palästinensischen||was verschiedene Gegenmaßnahmen||||| |||||||||provocando||||| C'était avant que le Hamas ne remporte les élections palestiniennes, provoquant diverses contre-mesures de la part d'Israël. And to be honest, if I had known when I was asked to give this upbeat talk that even as I was giving the upbeat talk, the apocalypse would be unfolding -- (Laughter) -- I might have said, "Is it okay if I talk about something else?" |||||||||||||||optimistische||||||||||||Apokalypse||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||unfolding|||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||radosny|||||||||||||||||||| Und um ehrlich zu sein, wenn ich gewusst hätte, als ich gebeten wurde, diesen fröhlichen Vortrag zu halten, dass sich die Apokalypse schon während ich den fröhlichen Vortrag hielt, entfalten würde - (Gelächter) - hätte ich vielleicht gesagt: "Ist es okay, wenn ich über etwas anderes spreche?" Y para ser honesto, si hubiera sabido cuando me pidieron que diera esta charla optimista que incluso mientras estaba dando la charla optimista, el apocalipsis se estaría desarrollando -- (Risas) -- podría haber dicho: "¿Está bien si hablo de otra cosa?". But I didn’t, OK. Pero no lo hice, vale. So we’re here. Así que aquí estamos. I’ll do what I can. Haré lo que pueda.

I’ll do what I can. Haré lo que pueda.

I’ve got to warn you: the sense in which my worldview is upbeat has always been kind of subtle, sometimes even elusive. ||||||||||||optimistisch||||||subtil|||schwierig Ich muss Sie warnen: Der Sinn, in dem meine Weltanschauung optimistisch ist, war schon immer etwas subtil, manchmal sogar schwer fassbar. Tengo que advertirle: el sentido en que mi visión del mundo es optimista siempre ha sido algo sutil, a veces incluso escurridizo. Je dois vous avertir : le sens dans lequel ma vision du monde est optimiste a toujours été plutôt subtile, parfois même insaisissable. (Laughter) The sense in which I can be uplifting and inspiring -- I mean, there’s always been a kind of a certain grim dimension to the way I try to uplift, so if grim inspiration -- (Laughter) -- if grim inspiration is not a contradiction in terms, that is, I’m afraid, the most you can hope for. ||||||||||inspirierend||||||||||gewisse|ernst||||||||erheben|||||||ernst|Inspiration||||Widerspruch|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||ponury wymiar|wymiar|||||||podnieść|||||||||||||||||||||||| (Gelächter) Der Sinn, in dem ich aufmunternd und inspirierend sein kann - ich meine, es gab schon immer eine gewisse düstere Dimension in der Art und Weise, wie ich versuche, aufzumuntern, wenn also düstere Inspiration - (Gelächter) - wenn düstere Inspiration kein Widerspruch in sich ist, dann ist das, fürchte ich, das Höchste, worauf man hoffen kann. (Risas) El sentido en el que puedo ser edificante e inspirador... Quiero decir, siempre ha habido una cierta dimensión sombría en la forma en que intento edificar, así que si la inspiración sombría... (Risas)... si la inspiración sombría no es una contradicción en los términos, eso es, me temo, lo máximo a lo que se puede aspirar. OK, today -- that’s if I succeed. I’ll see what I can do. Veré lo que puedo hacer. OK?

Now, in one sense, the claim that history has a direction is not that controversial. ||||||||||||||umstritten Nun ist die Behauptung, dass die Geschichte eine Richtung hat, in gewissem Sinne nicht so umstritten. If you’re just talking about social structure, OK, clearly that’s gotten more complex a little over the last 10 thousand years -- has reached higher and higher levels. Si sólo te refieres a la estructura social, de acuerdo, está claro que se ha vuelto un poco más compleja en los últimos 10 mil años... ha alcanzado niveles cada vez más altos. And in fact, that’s actually sustaining a long-standing trend that predates human beings, OK, that biological evolution was doing for us. |||||unterstützt||||||vorangeht|||||||||| |||||||||||predate|||||||||| Damit wird ein seit langem bestehender Trend aufrechterhalten, der schon vor dem Menschen bestand und den die biologische Evolution für uns geschaffen hat. Because what happened in the beginning, this stuff encases itself in a cell, then cells start hanging out together in societies. ||||||||schließt ein|||||||||||| ||||||||encierra|||||||||||| ||||||||otacza|||||||||||| Denn was am Anfang geschah, ist, dass dieses Zeug sich in einer Zelle einschließt, und dann beginnen die Zellen, sich in Gesellschaften zusammenzuschließen. Parce que ce qui s'est passé au début, ce truc s'enferme dans une cellule, puis les cellules commencent à traîner ensemble dans les sociétés. Eventually they get so close, they form multicellular organisms, then you get complex multicellular organisms; they form societies. |||||||||||||mehrzellige|||| Irgendwann kommen sie sich so nahe, dass sie mehrzellige Organismen bilden, und dann entstehen komplexe mehrzellige Organismen, die Gesellschaften bilden.

But then at some point, one of these multicellular organisms does something completely amazing with its stuff, which is it launches a whole second kind of evolution: cultural evolution. Aber irgendwann macht einer dieser vielzelligen Organismen etwas ganz Erstaunliches mit seinem Material, nämlich eine ganz zweite Art von Evolution in Gang setzen: die kulturelle Evolution. And amazingly, that evolution sustains the trajectory that biological evolution had established toward greater complexity. ||||unterstützt|||||||||| ||||||trajektoria|||||||| Erstaunlicherweise setzt diese Entwicklung den Weg fort, den die biologische Evolution zu größerer Komplexität eingeschlagen hatte. By cultural evolution we mean the evolution of ideas. A lot of you have heard the term "memes." ||||||||Memes Beaucoup d'entre vous ont entendu le terme "mèmes". The evolution of technology, I pay a lot of attention to, so, you know, one of the first things you got was a little hand axe. Ich verfolge die Entwicklung der Technologie sehr aufmerksam. Eines der ersten Dinge, die Sie bekamen, war eine kleine Handaxt. Generations go by, somebody says, hey, why don’t we put it on a stick? Generationen vergehen, und dann sagt jemand: "Hey, warum machen wir es nicht auf einen Stock? (Laughter) Just absolutely delights the little ones. Next best thing to a video game.

This may not seem to impress, but technological evolution is progressive, so another 10, 20,000 years, and armaments technology takes you here. |||||||||||||||Rüstungen|||| |||||||||||||||armas|||| Das mag nicht beeindrucken, aber die technologische Entwicklung ist fortschrittlich, also noch 10, 20.000 Jahre, und die Waffentechnologie bringt Sie hierher. (Laughter) Impressive. And the rate of technological evolution speeds up, so a mere quarter of a century after this, you get this, OK. (Laughter) And this. (Laughter) I’m sorry -- it was a cheap laugh, but I wanted to find a way to transition back to this idea of the unfolding apocalypse, and I thought that might do it. (Gelächter) Es tut mir leid - das war ein billiger Lacher, aber ich wollte einen Weg finden, um auf die Idee der sich anbahnenden Apokalypse zurückzukommen, und ich dachte, das könnte es tun. (Applause)

OK.

So, what threatens to happen with this unfolding apocalypse, is the collapse of global social organization. ||droht||||||||||||| Now, first let me remind you how much work it took to get us where we are, to be on the brink of true global social organization. Originally, you had the most complex societies, the hunter-gatherer village. |||||||||Sammler| |||||||||recolector| Stonehenge is the remnant of a chiefdom, which is what you get with the invention of agriculture: multi-village polity with centralized rule. |||Überbleibsel|||Häuptlingtum|||||||||||||Politik||| |||pozostałość|||księstwo|||||||||||||||| Stonehenge|||remanente|||jefatura|||||||||||||política||| With the invention of writing, you start getting cities. This is blurry. I kind of like that because it makes it look like a one-celled organism and reminds you how many levels organic organization has already moved through to get to this point. And then you get to, you know, you get empires. |||||||||Reiche

I want to stress, you know, social organization can transcend political bounds. |||||||||überschreiten|| This is the Silk Road connecting the Chinese Empire and the Roman Empire. So you had social complexity spanning the whole continent, even if no polity did similarly. |||||übergreifend|||Kontinent||||Staat||ähnlich |||||que abarcaba||||||||| Today, you’ve got nation states. Point is, there’s obviously collaboration and organization going on beyond national bounds. ||||Zusammenarbeit||||||| |||||||||||granice narodowe Der Punkt ist, dass es offensichtlich eine Zusammenarbeit und Organisation gibt, die über die nationalen Grenzen hinausgeht. This is actually just a picture of the earth at night, and I’m just putting it up because I think it’s pretty. Dies ist eigentlich nur ein Bild der Erde bei Nacht, und ich stelle es nur auf, weil ich es schön finde. Does kind of convey the sense that this is an integrated system.

OK.

Now, I explained this growth of complexity by reference to something called non-zero sumness. ||||||||||||||Nicht-Null-Summenzahl ||||||||||||||suma Maintenant, j'ai expliqué cette croissance de la complexité en faisant référence à quelque chose appelé somme non nulle. Assuming that a few of you did not do the assigned reading, very quickly, the key idea is the distinction between zero-sum games, in which correlations are inverse: always a winner and a loser. ||||||||||zugewiesenen||||||||||||||||||umgekehrt|||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||correlaciones|||||||| En supposant que quelques-uns d'entre vous n'aient pas fait la lecture assignée, très rapidement, l'idée clé est la distinction entre les jeux à somme nulle, dans lesquels les corrélations sont inverses : toujours un gagnant et un perdant. Non-zero-sum games in which correlations can be positive, OK. So like in tennis, usually it’s win-lose, it always adds up to zero-zero-sum, but if you’re playing doubles, the person on your side of the net, they’re in the same boat as you, so you’re playing a non-zero-sum game with them. ||||||||||||||||||||Doppel||||||||||||||||||||||||| It’s either for the better or for the worse, OK. A lot of forms of non-zero-sum behavior in the realm of economics and so on in everyday life often leads to cooperation. |||||||||||Bereich|||||||||||| |||||||||||dziedzinie||||||||||||

The argument I make is basically that, well, non-zero-sum games have always been part of life. Das Argument, das ich vorbringe, ist im Grunde, dass Nicht-Nullsummenspiele schon immer Teil des Lebens waren. You have them in hunter-gatherer societies, but then through technological evolution, new forms of technology arise that facilitate or encourage the playing of non-zero-sum games, involving more people over larger territory. ||||||||||||||||||erleichtern||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||ułatwiać||||||||||||||| Social structure adapts to accommodate this possibility and to harness this productive potential, so you get cities, you know, and you get all the non-zero-sum games you don’t think about that are being played across the world. |||||||||nutzen||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||wykorzystać||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Like, have you ever thought when you buy a car, how many people on how many different continents contributed to the manufacture of that car? ||||||||||||||||||beigetragen|||||| Those are people in effect you’re playing a non-zero-sum game with. I mean, there are certainly plenty of them around.

Now, this sounds like an intrinsically upbeat worldview in a way, because when you think of non-zero, you think win-win, you know, that’s good. Well, there are a few reasons that actually it’s not intrinsically upbeat. ||||||||||von Natur aus|optimistisch First of all, it can accommodate: it doesn’t deny the existence of inequality exploitation war. |||||unterbringen|||||||Ungleichheit|Ausbeutung| But there’s a more fundamental reason that it’s not intrinsically upbeat, because a non-zero-sum game, all it tells you for sure is that the fortunes will be correlated for better or worse. ||||||||||optimistisch||||||||||||||||das Schicksal|||korreliert|||| It doesn’t necessarily predict a win-win outcome.

So, in a way, the question is, on what grounds am I upbeat at all about history? Donc, d'une certaine manière, la question est de savoir pour quelles raisons suis-je optimiste à propos de l'histoire ? And the answer is, first of all, on balance I would say people have played their games to more win-win outcomes than lose-lose outcomes. |||||||||||||||||||||Ergebnisse|||| On balance, I think history is a net positive in the non-zero-sum game department. And a testament to this is the thing that most amazes me, most impresses me, and most uplifts me, which is that there is a moral dimension to history, there is a moral arrow. ||||||||||erstaunt|||||||erhebt|||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||podnosi|||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||impresiona||||eleva|||||||||||||||| We have seen moral progress over time.

2,500 years ago, members of one Greek city state considered members of another Greek city state subhuman and treated them that way. |||||||||||||||unmenschlich||||| |||||||||||||||subhuman||||| |||||||||||||||podludzie||||| And then this moral revolution arrived, and they decided that actually, no, Greeks are human beings. ||||||||||||die Griechen||| Und dann kam diese moralische Revolution, und sie beschlossen, dass die Griechen eigentlich keine Menschen sind. It’s just the Persians who aren’t fully human and don’t deserve to be treated very nicely. |||Perser|||||||||||| Nur die Perser sind nicht ganz menschlich und verdienen es nicht, besonders nett behandelt zu werden.

But this was progress -- you know, give them credit. And now today, we’ve seen more progress. I think -- I hope -- most people here would say that all people everywhere are human beings, deserve to be treated decently, unless they do something horrendous, regardless of race or religion. ||||||||||||||||||||würdig|||||horrend||||| ||||||||||||||||||||dignamente|||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||przyzwoicie|||||strasznego czynu||||| And you have to read your ancient history to realize what a revolution that has been, OK. This was not a prevalent view, few thousand years ago, and I attribute it to this non-zero-sum dynamic. ||||||||||||przypisuję to||||||| I think that’s the reason there is as much tolerance toward nationalities, ethnicities, religions, as there is today, you know. ||||||||||||Ethnien||||||| If you asked me, you know, why am I not in favor of bombing Japan, well, I’m only half-joking when I say they built my car, OK. |||||||||||||||||||spaßend|||||||| |||||||||||||bombardowaniu|||||||||||||| We have this non-zero-sum relationship, and I think that does lead to a kind of a tolerance to the extent that you realize that someone else’s welfare is positively correlated with yours. ||||||||||||||||||Toleranz||||||||||||||| You’re more likely to cut them a break.

I kind of think this is a kind of a business-class morality. ||||||||||||Moralität Unfortunately, I don’t fly trans-Atlantic business class often enough to know, or any other kind of business class really. ||||transatlantisch||||||||||||||| But I assume that in business class, you don’t hear many expressions of, you know, bigotry about racial groups or ethnic groups, because the people who are flying trans-Atlantic business class are doing business with all these people; they’re making money off of all these people. |||||||||||||||Vorurteile||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||intolerancia||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||nietolerancja||rasowych||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| And I really do think that in that sense at least, capitalism has been a constructive force, and more fundamentally, it’s a non-zero-sumness that has been a constructive force in expanding people’s realm of moral awareness, OK. |||||||||||Kapitalismus|||||||||||||Nicht-Null-Summen-Spiel||||||||||Bereich|||| I think the non-zero-sum dynamic, which is not only economic by any means -- it’s not always commerce -- but it has driven us to the verge of a moral truth, which is the fundamental equality of everyone. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||Rand||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||krawędź||||||||||| Ich denke, die Nicht-Nullsummen-Dynamik, die keineswegs nur wirtschaftlich ist - es geht nicht immer um den Handel -, hat uns an den Rand einer moralischen Wahrheit getrieben, nämlich der grundlegenden Gleichheit aller Menschen. It has done that. As it has moved global, moved us toward a global level of social organization it has driven us toward moral truth. I think that’s wonderful.

Now, back to the unfolding apocalypse. ||||rozwijającego się| And you may wonder, OK, that’s all fine, sounds great -- moral direction in history -- but what about this so-called clash of civilizations? Well, first of all, I would emphasize that it fits into the non-zero-sum framework, OK. ||||||betonen|||||||||| ||||||podkreślić|||||||||| If you look at the relationship between the so-called Muslim world and Western world -- two terms I don’t like, but can’t really avoid -- in such a short span of time, they’re efficient if nothing else. ||||||||||Muslim||||||||||||||||||||||||| It is non-zero-sum. And by that I mean, if people in the Muslim world get more hateful, more resentful, less happy with their place in the world, it’ll be bad for the West. |||||||||||||hasserisch||verbittert|||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||zawistny|||||||||||||| If they get more happy, it’ll be good for the West. So that is a non-zero-sum dynamic.

And I would say the non-zero-sum dynamic is only going to grow more intense over time because of technological trends, but more intense in a kind of negative way. It’s the down-side correlation of their fortunes that will become more and more possible. ||||Korrelation|||Vermögen||||||| Es ist die negative Korrelation ihrer Schicksale, die immer mehr möglich wird. And one reason is because of something I call the growing lethality of hatred. |||||||||||Lethalität||Hass |||||||||||letalidad|| |||||||||||śmiertelność nienawiści|| Und ein Grund dafür ist etwas, das ich die wachsende Tödlichkeit des Hasses nenne. More and more, it’s possible for grassroots hatred abroad to manifest itself in the form of organized violence on American soil. ||||||||||äußern|||||||||| And that’s pretty new, and I think it’s probably going to get a lot worse -- this capacity -- because of transient information technology, in technologies that can be used for purposes of munitions like biotechnology and nanotechnology. |||||||||||||||||||vorübergehender||||||||||Zwecken||Munition||||Nanotechnologie |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||municiones|||| |||||||||||||||||||przejrzysty||||||||||||municje|||| We may be hearing more about that today.

And there’s something I worry about especially, which is that, this dynamic will lead to a kind of a feedback cycle that puts us on a slippery slope. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||ślizgiem| What I have in mind is: terrorism happens here; we overreact to it. ||||||||||reagieren|| ||||||||||przesadzamy|| That, you know, we’re not sufficiently surgical in our retaliation leads to more hatred abroad, more terrorism. ||||||sorgfältig|||||||||| ||||||chirurgiczny|||||||||| We overreact because being human, we feel like retaliating, and it gets worse and worse and worse. ||||||||Rache nehmen|||||||| ||||||||vengándonos|||||||| ||||||||mścić się|||||||| You could call this the positive feedback of negative vibes, but I think in something so spooky, we really shouldn’t have the word positive there at all, even in a technical sense. |||||||||Vibes|||||||||||||||||||||| So let’s call it the death spiral of negativity. ||||||||Negativität (Laughter) I assure you if it happens, at the end, both the West and the Muslim world will have suffered. ||zapewniam cię||||||||||||||||| OK.

So, what do we do? Well, first of all, we can do a lot more with arms control, the international regulation of dangerous technologies. I have a whole global governance sermon that I will spare you right now, because I don’t think that’s going to be enough anyway, although it’s essential. |||||Governance|Predigt|||||||||||||||||||es| ||||||kazanie|||||||||||||||||||| Ich habe eine ganze Predigt zum Thema Global Governance, die ich Ihnen jetzt ersparen möchte, denn ich glaube nicht, dass das ausreichen wird, obwohl es wichtig ist. I think we’re going to have to have a major round of moral progress in the world. I think you’re just going to have to see less hatred among groups, less bigotry, and, you know, racial groups, religious groups, whatever. |||||||||||||mniej||||||||| I’ve got to admit I feel silly saying that. It sounds so kind of Pollyannaish. |||||naiv optimistisch |||||optimista I feel like Rodney King, you know, saying, why can’t we all just get along? |||Rodney||||||||||| |||Rodney||||||||||| But A: I don’t really see any alternative, given the way I read the situation. There’s going to have to be moral progress, OK. There’s going to have to be a lessening of the amount of hatred in the world, given how dangerous it’s becoming. |||||||Verringerung||||||||||||| |||||||reducción||||||||||||| In my defense, I’d say, as naive as this may sound, it’s ultimately grounded in cynicism. |||||||||||||||Zynismus |||||||||||||uzasadniony||

That is to say -- (Laughter) -- thank you, thank you. That is to say, remember: my whole view of morality is that it boils down to self-interest. It’s when people’s fortunes are correlated. |||Vermögen|| It’s when your welfare conduces to mine, that I decide, oh yeah, I’m all in favor of your welfare. ||||beiträgt|||||||||||||| ||||conduce|||||||||||||| ||||sprzyja|||||||||||||| That’s what’s responsible for this growth of this moral progress so far, and I’m saying we once again have a correlation of fortunes. And if people respond to it intelligently, we will see the development of tolerance and so on -- the norms that we need, you know. ||||||intelligent|||||Entwicklung|||||||Normen||||| We will see the further evolution of this kind of business-class morality.

So, these two things, you know, if they get people’s attention and drive home the positive correlation and people do what’s in their self-interests, which is further the moral evolution, then they could actually have a constructive effect. And that’s why I lump growing lethality of hatred and death spiral of negativity under the general rubric: reasons to be cheerful. ||||verallgemeine||Lethalität|||||||||||Rubrik|||| |||||||||||||||||rubrica|||| ||||wrzucam razem|||||||||||||kategoria|||| Et c'est pourquoi je classe la létalité croissante de la haine et la spirale de la mort de la négativité sous la rubrique générale : des raisons d'être joyeux. (Laughter) Doing the best I can, okay. (Laughter) I never called myself Mr. Uplift. I’m just doing what I can here. (Laughter)

Now, launching a moral revolution has got to be hard, right? |starten||||||||| I mean, what do you do? And I think the answer is a lot of different people are going to have to do a lot of different things. We all start where we are. Speaking as an American who has children whose security 10, 20, 30 years down the road I worry about -- what I personally want to start out doing is figuring out why so many people around the world hate us, OK. I think that’s a worthy research project myself. I also like it because it’s an intrinsically kind of morally redeeming exercise, Because to understand why somebody in a very different culture does something -- somebody you’re kind of viewing as alien -- who’s doing things you consider strange in a culture you consider strange, to really understand why they do the things they do is a morally redeeming accomplishment because you’ve got to relate their experience to yours. |||||||von Natur aus|||moralisch||Übung|||||||||||||||||betrachten|||||||betrachten||||||betrachten||||||||||||||moralisch|moralisch wertvoll|Errungenschaft||||||||| |||||||||||redentor|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||odkupujący|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| To really understand it, you’ve got to say, "Oh, I get it. So when they feel resentful, it’s kind of like the way I feel resentful when this happens, and for somewhat the same reasons." That’s true understanding. And I think that is an expansion of your moral compass when you manage to do that. ||||||||||Kompass||||||

It’s especially hard to do when people hate you, OK, because you don’t really want to completely understand why people hate you. I mean, you want to hear the reason, but you don’t want to be able to relate to it. ||||||||||||||||nachvollziehen|| You don’t want it to make sense, right? You don’t want to say, "Well, yeah, I can kind of understand how a human being in those circumstances would hate the country I live in." ||||||||||||||||||Umständen||||||| That’s not a pleasant thing, but I think it’s something that we’re going to have to get used to and

work on. Now, I want to stress that to understand, you know, there are people who don’t like this whole business of understanding the grassroots, the root causes of things; they don’t want to know why people hate us. ||||||||||||||||||||||Basis-|||||||||||||| Maintenant, je veux souligner que pour comprendre, vous savez, il y a des gens qui n'aiment pas toute cette histoire de comprendre la base, les causes profondes des choses ; ils ne veulent pas savoir pourquoi les gens nous détestent. I want to understand it. The reason you’re trying to understand why they hate us, is to get them to quit hating us, OK. ||||||||||||||||odiando|| The idea when you go through this moral exercise of really coming to appreciate their humanity and better understand them, is part of an effort to get them to appreciate your humanity in the long run. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||wertschätzen|||||| I think it’s the first step toward that. That’s the long-term goal.

There are people who worry about this, and in fact, I myself, apparently, was denounced on national TV a couple of nights ago because of an op-ed I’d written. ||||||||||||||verraten||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||potępiony||||||||||||||| It was kind of along these lines, and the allegation was that I have, quote, "affection for terrorists." |||||||||Behauptung||||||||Terroristen |||||||||alegación|||||||| |||||||||oskarżenie||||||sympatię|| Die Anschuldigung lautete, ich hätte, Zitat, "Zuneigung zu Terroristen". Now, the good news is that the person who said it was Ann Coulter, OK. ||||||||||||Ann|Coulter| |||||||||||||Coulter| (Laughter) (Applause) I mean, if you’ve got to have an enemy, do make it Ann Coulter. ||||||||||wróg||||| (Gelächter) (Beifall) Ich meine, wenn man schon einen Feind haben muss, dann Ann Coulter. (Laughter) But it’s not a crazy concern, OK, because understanding behavior can lead to a kind of empathy, and it can make it a little harder to deliver tough love, and so on. |||||||||||||||||Empathie||||||||||||||| (Gelächter) Aber das ist keine verrückte Sorge, OK, denn das Verstehen von Verhalten kann zu einer Art von Empathie führen, und es kann es ein wenig schwieriger machen, harte Liebe zu vermitteln, und so weiter. But I think we’re a lot closer to erring on the side of not comprehending the situation clearly enough, than in comprehending it so clearly that we just can’t, you know, get the army out to kill terrorists. ||||||||Fehler machen||||||verstehen|||||||verstehen|||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||rozumienia||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||errar||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Aber ich denke, dass wir die Situation eher nicht klar genug einschätzen, als dass wir sie so klar einschätzen, dass wir nicht einfach die Armee losschicken können, um Terroristen zu töten.

So I’m not really worried about it. So -- (Laughter) -- I mean, we’re going to have to work on a lot of fronts, OK, but if we succeed -- if we succeed -- then once again, non-zero-sumness and the recognition of non-zero-sum dynamics will have forced us to a higher moral level. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||suma zerowa||||||||||||||||| Also -- (Gelächter) -- ich meine, wir werden an vielen Fronten arbeiten müssen, OK, aber wenn wir Erfolg haben -- wenn wir Erfolg haben -- dann wird uns die Nicht-Nullsummen-Dynamik und die Anerkennung der Nicht-Nullsummen-Dynamik wieder einmal auf ein höheres moralisches Niveau gezwungen haben. And a kind of saving higher moral level, something that kind of literally saves the world. ||||||||||||buchstäblich|rettet|| If you look at the word salvation in the Bible -- the Christian usage that we’re familiar with, saving souls, that people go to heaven -- that’s actually a latecomer. ||||||Erlösung|||||||||||||||||||||Nachzügler |||||||||||||||||||||||||||tardío ||||||zbawienie|||||||||||||||||||||nawrócony Wenn man sich das Wort Erlösung in der Bibel anschaut - der christliche Sprachgebrauch, mit dem wir vertraut sind, die Rettung von Seelen, dass Menschen in den Himmel kommen - das ist eigentlich ein Nachzügler. The original meaning of the word salvation in the Bible is about saving the social system. "Yahweh is our Savior," means "He has saved the nation of Israel," which at the time, was a pretty high-level social organization. Jahwe|||Retter||||||||||||||||||| Yahweh|||||||||||||||||||||| Now, social organization has reached the global level, and I guess, if there’s good news I can say I’m bringing you, it’s just that all the salvation of the world requires is the intelligent pursuit of self-interests in a disciplined and careful way. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||Verfolgung||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||dążenie||||||||| Nun hat die gesellschaftliche Organisation die globale Ebene erreicht, und ich denke, wenn es eine gute Nachricht gibt, die ich Ihnen überbringen kann, dann die, dass alles, was die Rettung der Welt erfordert, die intelligente Verfolgung von Eigeninteressen auf disziplinierte und sorgfältige Weise ist. It’s going to be hard. I say we give it a shot anyway because we’ve just come too far to screw it up now. Ich sage, wir sollten es trotzdem versuchen, denn wir sind einfach zu weit gekommen, um es jetzt zu vermasseln. Thanks. (Applause)

http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_wright_on_optimism.html