×

Vi använder kakor för att göra LingQ bättre. Genom att besöka sajten, godkänner du vår cookie-policy.

image

Moyers on Democracy podcast, Lisa Graves Gives Us an Update on the Battle for the Post Office

Lisa Graves Gives Us an Update on the Battle for the Post Office

ANNOUNCER: Welcome to Moyers on Democracy. That's Lisa Graves on how to save our postal service from corruption. Once a senior deputy to two U.S. attorneys general – one a Democrat, the other at Republican – she is now Executive Director of True North Research, a non-profit policy research and watchdog group that investigates how special interest groups influence our political system for private gain. She recently published THE BILLIONAIRE BEHIND EFFORTS TO KILL THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, an extensive investigation on Charles Koch's crusade to privatize the postal service. You can read that astonishing report on Billmoyers.com. Bill invited Lisa Graves back to update what's happened at the postal service since their last conversation.

BILL MOYERS: The last time we talked, the Postal Service was in turmoil. President Trump and his postmaster general were trying to sabotage it so that it couldn't handle the millions of mail-in ballots, causing people to lose faith in the election process. It was an all-court press on trying to handicap, cripple, the Postal Service. How do you read the situation now? Do you think that with the support of a lot of federal courts around the country the Postal Service has recovered to the point where it can do its core function, which is to deliver the mail on time for the election?

RELATED: Moyers on Democracy

LISA GRAVES: Well, I am heartened by the judicial decisions. None of them have been by Trump judges, by the way. They've been by longstanding judges on the courts who have ruled or issued injunctions to try to prevent the policies under Louis DeJoy that have so disrupted Americans' mail from further disrupting it. We know more now than we knew then, including how the directives of Louis DeJoy have harmed the ability of the Postal Service, including with what they call the on-time departure, meaning on-time departure without your mail. And Louis DeJoy said he didn't forbid overtime, that he just restricted it. Okay. Well, that restriction had a huge impact on the on-time delivery of the mail. And so, the court rulings certainly worked to mitigate that. Last week, the Postal Service said it was gonna be complying with the decisions but that it could not restore all the machines that had been dismantled. And the finding of one of the courts is significant because even though, every year, some number of sorting machines are removed from service they need to be repaired, or they're old, or they're not needed in that facility. In the past four years, I think the number removed has been in the 300s. But starting this summer, more than 700 machines were removed in a very short time frame. And what one of the courts ruled was that that was part of a real politicization of the Postal Service, in part because more than 70% of those machines were from counties, cities, that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. It really is startling to think that in cities where you have a huge population and where you may very well have more people voting by mail – in part because of the way that the coronavirus has impacted cities, which are more densely populated than other areas – that that's the area in which these machines were being removed, at a disproportionate rate. The Postal Service said that many of those machines, they cannot be put back into service. I think that there are still difficulties. And every day, even with these court rulings, there seems to be some new revelation, including one earlier this week that suddenly the Postal Service stopped updating the change-of-address database in substantial measure. It trickled from thousands of updates to hundreds of updates just as the counties were drawing on that database to send ballots out in August and into September. It's very worrisome, what's been happening at the Postal Service and the things we don't know about what's been happening behind the scenes. Ultimately, I'm still calling on Louis DeJoy to resign. He should not be in that post. He has severe conflicts of interest due to his financial holdings. He has a very troubling record of, you know, in terms of witnesses describing use of his company to push his political agenda and to push people to donate, and then rewarding them with bonuses for donating which, if proven, is a crime under straw donor rules in this country that have been in existence for a long time. He's made hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations to the Trump campaign to try to help it win in this election. That, I think, is also disqualifying. And he's been working with Steve Mnuchin on what is clearly a plan to privatize the Postal Service as we talked about, Charles Koch's effort to basically push the Postal Service or part out the Postal Service for the private sector for profit. So, I think he needs to resign. And I think that having him preside over this election, even under court order doesn't give me comfort. I don't think he should be in that role. And I think that the board of the Postal Service also needs to be reformed because it's being helmed by Senator Mitch McConnell's right-hand man and lead fundraiser for his senate leadership fundraising. And so, the Postal Service has been politicized by this administration. And it needs to be de-politicized. And it needs to be restored and actually expanded, invested in, to do the job that the American people know it needs to do for them in this election and in general.

BILL MOYERS: Wouldn't it be great if people – Democrats, Republicans – in the towns and cities and suburbs where they live would go down to the post office and say, “Are you being harassed? Are you being prevented from doing your job? And if so, let's organize to track our member of Congress until this is changed.” I mean, if you started a movement around the post office, a non-partisan movement, because the post office is so important to where we all live, you might get some of that change.

LISA GRAVES: I think that's right. It should be a non-partisan issue. People should be coming together and rallying around protecting this great institution that is as old as our democracy. If people would join together and go to their local post offices and say: How can we protect you? How can we protect the service you provide? How can we make sure that the people who represent us actually protect this core public service that the postal service provides? I think that could be the beginning of a great trans-partisan movement to defend the institutions of our democracy.

BILL MOYERS: Trump is still making false and exaggerated claims about voter fraud and voting by mail. Did you hear any of the robocalls that the Republicans have unleashed, urging Trump voters to vote by absentee ballot in the election, but not to vote by mail, because they said, while absentee ballots are safe and secure, voting by mail can be fraudulent. I mean, just weird, because they're really essentially the same, absentee ballots and voting by mail. And I listened to the tape of the robocall:

KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE: President Trump needs you to join him in voting absentee this year… Absentee voting is safe, secure and supported by President Trump. The radical left wants universal vote-by-mail, which is proven to be filled with fraud, abuse and mistakes.

BILL MOYERS: These robocalls were done by two people, Donald Trump Jr. 's girlfriend and his daughter-in-law, saying confusing things about absentee ballots and voting by mail. What's going on there?

LISA GRAVES: This is new, this sort of twist that they've put on it this past week with those robocalls in saying, definitely get your absentee ballot, but don't vote by mail, when, in fact, you know, Americans use the mail for all sorts of important sensitive things. We mail our taxes, although some people do it electronically now because it's more convenient, but not because it wasn't safe. People get their tax refunds often by mail. People mail their bills by mail, get checks by mail. You go to the post office and drop off your mail or put the mail in your mailbox. It's actually a crime to remove the mail from someone else's mailbox. And, in fact, by the way, that's something that surprisingly came up in connection with Louis DeJoy, where his brother, his own brother accused him of stealing his mail, of opening secret bank accounts in his name and then hiding the mail from him for five years, which we've never seen alleged against a postmaster general in history. Of course, he denied it and settled that case. But, you know, stealing people's mail is a crime. And that crime is prosecuted in America. It does happen from time to time. But there's no evidence that there's some band of ballot thieves out there stealing people's ballots out of mailboxes or out of the post office. There are concerns about the man who's at the head of the post office making things into a chaotic circumstance that delays the ballots and makes it harder for them to get counted. That's, I think, a worry that I have. But this notion put forward by these two members of Trump's team that they should request absentee ballots but not vote by mail because there's some conspiracy that Democrats are somehow stealing the mail out of their mailboxes is just nonsense. During the 2016 Election after Donald Trump claimed that more than three million ballots had been cast fraudulently, which just happened to be the same number that he lost by in the popular vote – no coincidence there, right – after that, there was an investigation of how many people were actually prosecuted and there were four cases out of, you know, millions and millions of ballots cast. And, interestingly, all four of those cases were Republicans, which was, you know, a surprise that that was the outcome. But four out of hundreds of millions of votes cast, in the sense of all the different votes at the primary and general level in 2016, cumulatively. And, you know, in the course of more than a billion ballots cast, voter fraud is extremely rare. But what's not rare is voter suppression. And what's not rare is this effort to kick people off the voting rolls because they didn't vote in a primary or they didn't vote in a midterm election, and make it harder for them to vote so that their vote is, quote, “a provisional ballot,” that doesn't count that day if they have to pass it that day. And then people wonder, “Should I wait in line because will my vote count?” Yes, you should wait in line. Yes, we need people to vote to have their votes cast and have their votes counted. But what's happening right now is that you have this battle going on, orchestrated by Trump's team to attack voting by mail in the states, to attack measures to make it easier in a deadly pandemic for people to cast their vote. And we're gonna see this effort by the president to claim victory on Election Day or Election Night, based on in-person ballots, and to have his legal team fight to stop the counting of mailed-in ballots or absentee ballots that are delivered to ballot boxes and to try to claim that those ballots are somehow fraudulent if the count goes toward Biden, his opponent. They've already telegraphed that this is their plan. They've already said it out loud. Jim Jordan said it expressly during the hearing with Mr. DeJoy, that the president's gonna win on Tuesday night, November 3rd, and that then all these ballots will be counted, and that will somehow be a fraud. Well, the fact is, is that because we're in a pandemic, we are gonna have more people voting remotely than probably ever before. And those ballots of the American people need to be counted. But this president and his henchmen, in Congress, and in the Administration are trying to set up a scenario in which he gets to declare himself a winner, even if he loses, and try to stay in power unjustly if he loses by claiming that the ballots that are mailed are inherently fraudulent or false. I don't know that we've ever had a president behave in this way, ever. I don't even know whether Strom Thurmond as a Dixiecrat you know, even uttered such things, although obviously in that Jim Crow era there was a whole array of tactics to intimidate voters and to try poll taxes and literacy tests and more to try to keep African Americans from voting. But in modern American history, I don't think we've ever had a president or a party who has so grotesquely attacked the core rote in a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, which is the right to vote and have that vote be counted.

BILL MOYERS: So if the scenario unfolds as you've just described it on Election Day and Election Night, what should people do?

LISA GRAVES: Oooh. I think that prevention is the best medicine. Everybody needs to make sure that they are registered. You can call your county. You can check online. There are a number of reputable sources for checking whether you are registered. Make sure you're registered to vote. Make a plan for voting. Make sure that you have a plan. Are you going to vote? Are you gonna request an absentee ballot, if you can? Are you in a state where your absentee ballot is already coming because it's automatically mailed to you? Once you have your ballot, what is your plan for getting it counted? Are you gonna mail it in? Are you going to make sure that you have signed it appropriately or had a witness in some states that requires a witness? Make sure you have the envelope. If there's a requirement of an outer envelope, that that envelope be used and that it be signed. You know, just follow the rules, check them twice and then check them one more time to make sure that your ballot can't be disqualified by some partisan trying to deny your vote its power. Are you voting in person? If you are, can you make sure that you can stay in that line as long as possible– you know, that you have taken time off from work if you can or that you have arrangements made for you to be in that line, to stay until your vote, your ballot is cast? And then there's also a need for people to be monitors to make sure that the ballots are counted. And also, on Election Day, younger people who are not as high a risk as others, have been asked to volunteer at precincts, to sit at the table, to check voters in and check their names off the list. There's opportunities to volunteer to be an independent and fair administrator of the election. And then in terms of the counting I think we're gonna have to just say that every ballot in America that's cast needs to be counted. And there's no decision until all the ballots are counted. I don't think that this desire by some news stations to call a winner as quickly as possible– I think that's unhealthy for our democracy. And it's particularly unhealthy in this environment, where we know there are gonna be a number of absentee ballots cast by mail or by ballot boxes. We have to insist that no one be declared a winner until they're actually a winner. And we have to insist that our votes be counted. And that may require people engaging in non-violent action of being in the street, being at the courthouses, being at the clerk's office, peacefully demanding that in our democracy our ballots all be counted.

BILL MOYERS: Lisa Graves, thank you very much.

LISA GRAVES: Thank you.

ANNOUNCER: Thanks for listening to Moyers on Democracy. You'll find more from Lisa Graves about the post office fight on Billmoyers.com. Until next time, all this and more at Billmoyers.com.

Learn languages from TV shows, movies, news, articles and more! Try LingQ for FREE

Lisa Graves Gives Us an Update on the Battle for the Post Office Lisa Graves gibt uns ein Update zum Kampf um das Postamt Lisa Graves nos pone al día sobre la batalla por la Oficina de Correos Lisa Graves nous donne des nouvelles de la bataille pour le bureau de poste Lisa Graves ci aggiorna sulla battaglia per l'ufficio postale リサ・グレイブスによる郵便局争奪戦の最新情報 리사 그레이브스가 우체국 전투에 대한 소식을 전합니다. Lisa Graves pateikia naujausią informaciją apie mūšį dėl pašto skyriaus Lisa Graves geeft ons een update over de strijd om het postkantoor Lisa Graves przekazuje nam aktualne informacje na temat bitwy o pocztę Lisa Graves dá-nos informações actualizadas sobre a batalha pelos correios Лиза Грейвс рассказывает о ходе битвы за почтовое отделение Lisa Graves Postane İçin Verilen Mücadeleyi Anlattı Ліза Грейвз розповідає про боротьбу за поштове відділення 丽莎·格雷夫斯向我们介绍了邮局之战的最新情况 麗莎·格雷夫斯向我們介紹郵局之戰的最新情況

ANNOUNCER: Welcome to Moyers on Democracy. That's Lisa Graves on how to save our postal service from corruption. |||||||||||korupcji Once a senior deputy to two U.S. |||副|||| |||adjoint principal|||| |||deputowany|||| Однажды старшим заместителем двух американских attorneys general – one a Democrat, the other at Republican – she is now Executive Director of True North Research, a non-profit policy research and watchdog group that investigates how special interest groups influence our political system for private gain. procureurs généraux||||||||||||Directrice exécutive||||||||||||groupe de surveillance|||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||Überwachungsgruppe|||||||||||||| adwokaci|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| She recently published THE BILLIONAIRE BEHIND EFFORTS TO KILL THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, an extensive investigation on Charles Koch's crusade to privatize the postal service. ||||||||运动||||| ||||enquête approfondie|||de Koch|croisade||privatiser||| ||||||||||privatisieren||| You can read that astonishing report on Billmoyers.com. ||||étonnant|||Billmoyers.com| ||||zdumiewający|raport||Billmoyers| Bill invited Lisa Graves back to update what's happened at the postal service since their last conversation. ||||||||się wydarzyło||||||||

BILL MOYERS: The last time we talked, the Postal Service was in turmoil. ||||||||||||动荡 ||||||||||||agitation ||||||||||||zamieszaniu President Trump and his postmaster general were trying to sabotage it so that it couldn't handle the millions of mail-in ballots, causing people to lose faith in the election process. |||||||||破坏||||||||||||||||||||| ||||maître de poste|||||saboter||||||||||||||||||||| ||||general|||||sabotować||||||poradzić sobie||||||głosów|powodując||||wiarę|||| It was an all-court press on trying to handicap, cripple, the Postal Service. |||||||||削弱|瘫痪||| ||||||||||paralyser||| How do you read the situation now? Do you think that with the support of a lot of federal courts around the country the Postal Service has recovered to the point where it can do its core function, which is to deliver the mail on time for the election? |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||fonction principale|||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||wróciła|||||||||||||||||||||

RELATED: Moyers on Democracy

LISA GRAVES: Well, I am heartened by the judicial decisions. |||||感到振奋|||司法的| |||||encouragée|||| |||||pocieszony|||| None of them have been by Trump judges, by the way. They've been by longstanding judges on the courts who have ruled or issued injunctions to try to prevent the policies under Louis DeJoy that have so disrupted Americans' mail from further disrupting it. |||de longue date||||||||||injonctions|||||||||Louis DeJoy||||perturbé|||||perturber| |||długoterminowych||||||||||||||||polityki|||||||zakłóciły|||||| We know more now than we knew then, including how the directives of Louis DeJoy have harmed the ability of the Postal Service, including with what they call the on-time departure, meaning on-time departure without your mail. |||||||||||directives|||||nui à|||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||w tym|jak||dyrektywy|||||szkodzą|||||||||||||||||||||| And Louis DeJoy said he didn't forbid overtime, that he just restricted it. |||||||heures supplémentaires restreintes||||limité| Okay. Well, that restriction had a huge impact on the on-time delivery of the mail. |||||||||||dostawę||| And so, the court rulings certainly worked to mitigate that. ||||décisions judiciaires||||atténuer| ||||||||złagodzić| Last week, the Postal Service said it was gonna be complying with the decisions but that it could not restore all the machines that had been dismantled. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||拆解 ||||||||||se conformer à||||||||||||||||démantelées ||||||||||przestrzegać|||||||||przywrócić|||||||zdemontowane And the finding of one of the courts is significant because even though, every year, some number of sorting machines are removed from service they need to be repaired, or they're old, or they're not needed in that facility. ||||||||||||||||||triage||||||||||||||||||||installation |||znalezienie|||||||||||||||||||||||||naprawione|||||||||| In the past four years, I think the number removed has been in the 300s. |||||||||usuniętych||||| But starting this summer, more than 700 machines were removed in a very short time frame. |||lato||||||||||| And what one of the courts ruled was that that was part of a real politicization of the Postal Service, in part because more than 70% of those machines were from counties, cities, that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. |||||||||||||||政治化||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||politisation|||||||||||||||comtés|||Hillary Clinton|Hillary Clinton|| 其中一家法院的裁决是,这是邮政服务真正政治化的一部分,部分原因是超过 70% 的邮寄地址来自希拉里·克林顿在 2016 年获胜的县和城市。 It really is startling to think that in cities where you have a huge population and where you may very well have more people voting by mail – in part because of the way that the coronavirus has impacted cities, which are more densely populated than other areas – that that's the area in which these machines were being removed, at a disproportionate rate. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||人口众多|||||||||||||||||不成比例| |||stupéfiant||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||coronavirus|||||||densément|peuplées|||||||||||||||||disproportionné| 令人吃惊的是,在人口众多的城市,可能会有更多人通过邮寄投票——部分原因是冠状病毒对人口比其他地区更密集的城市产生了影响——而这些地区的邮寄投票机器却被以不成比例的速度撤走。 The Postal Service said that many of those machines, they cannot be put back into service. I think that there are still difficulties. ||||||困难 And every day, even with these court rulings, there seems to be some new revelation, including one earlier this week that suddenly the Postal Service stopped updating the change-of-address database in substantial measure. |||||||裁决|||||||揭示|||||||||||||||||数据库||实质性的| |||||||décisions judiciaires|||||||||||||||||||mise à jour|||||||| It trickled from thousands of updates to hundreds of updates just as the counties were drawing on that database to send ballots out in August and into September. ||||||||||||||||||数据库|||||||||九月 |s'est réduit||||||||||||||||||||bulletins de vote|||||| 就在各县利用该数据库在 8 月和 9 月寄出选票时,更新数量从数千条增至数百条。 It's very worrisome, what's been happening at the Postal Service and the things we don't know about what's been happening behind the scenes. ||令人担忧|||||||||||||||||||| ||inquiétant|||||||||||||||||||| 邮政服务部门发生的事情以及我们不知道的幕后发生的事情非常令人担忧。 Ultimately, I'm still calling on Louis DeJoy to resign. ||||||||辞职 ||||||||démissionner 最终,我仍然呼吁路易斯·德乔伊辞职。 He should not be in that post. He has severe conflicts of interest due to his financial holdings. |||利益冲突|||||||资产 ||||||||||participations financières He has a very troubling record of, you know, in terms of witnesses describing use of his company to push his political agenda and to push people to donate, and then rewarding them with bonuses for donating which, if proven, is a crime under straw donor rules in this country that have been in existence for a long time. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||奖励|||奖金|||||证明|||||稻草|捐赠||||||||||||| ||||troublant|||||||||||||||||||||||||||récompensant|||primes|||||prouvé|||||donneur fictif|||||||||||||| He's made hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations to the Trump campaign to try to help it win in this election. ||||||美元||捐款||||||||||||| That, I think, is also disqualifying. |||||不合格 |||||disqualifiant 我认为,这也是取消资格的。 And he's been working with Steve Mnuchin on what is clearly a plan to privatize the Postal Service as we talked about, Charles Koch's effort to basically push the Postal Service or part out the Postal Service for the private sector for profit. ||||||穆努钦||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||部门|| ||||||Steve Mnuchin|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 他一直在与史蒂夫·姆努钦合作,制定一项显然是私有化邮政服务的计划,正如我们之前提到的,查尔斯·科赫的努力基本上是推动邮政服务或将邮政服务分拆给私营部门以获取利润。 So, I think he needs to resign. And I think that having him preside over this election, even under court order doesn't give me comfort. ||||||présider à||||||||||| I don't think he should be in that role. And I think that the board of the Postal Service also needs to be reformed because it's being helmed by Senator Mitch McConnell's right-hand man and lead fundraiser for his senate leadership fundraising. ||||||||||||||||||||参议员|米奇|麦康奈尔||||||筹款人|||||筹款 ||||||||||||||réformé||||dirigé par||sénateur|Mitch McConnell|de McConnell||||||collecteur de fonds|||||levée de fonds And so, the Postal Service has been politicized by this administration. |||||||政治化||| ||||||||||administration actuelle And it needs to be de-politicized. ||||||政治化 ||||||politisé And it needs to be restored and actually expanded, invested in, to do the job that the American people know it needs to do for them in this election and in general. ||||||||扩展|投资|||||||||||||||||||||| |||||restauré||||||||||||||||||||||||||

BILL MOYERS: Wouldn't it be great if people – Democrats, Republicans – in the towns and cities and suburbs where they live would go down to the post office and say, “Are you being harassed? ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||骚扰 ||||||||||||||||banlieues||||||||||||||||harcelé(e)(s) 比尔·莫耶斯:如果人们——无论是民主党人还是共和党人——在他们所居住的城镇和郊区都能去邮局问“你们被骚扰了吗?”那不是很好吗? Are you being prevented from doing your job? |||empêché|||| 您是否被妨碍开展工作了? And if so, let's organize to track our member of Congress until this is changed.” I mean, if you started a movement around the post office, a non-partisan movement, because the post office is so important to where we all live, you might get some of that change. ||||组织||||||国会||||||||||||||||||非党派|||||||||||||||||||| 如果是这样,让我们组织起来,追踪我们的国会议员,直到这种情况发生改变。”我的意思是,如果你围绕邮局发起一场运动,一场无党派运动,因为邮局对于我们所有人居住的地方都非常重要,你可能会得到一些改变。

LISA GRAVES: I think that's right. It should be a non-partisan issue. People should be coming together and rallying around protecting this great institution that is as old as our democracy. ||||||团结|||||||||||| ||||||se mobiliser|||||||||||| If people would join together and go to their local post offices and say: How can we protect you? How can we protect the service you provide? How can we make sure that the people who represent us actually protect this core public service that the postal service provides? ||||||||||||||noyau||||||| I think that could be the beginning of a great trans-partisan movement to defend the institutions of our democracy. ||||||||||跨党||||||制度||| 我认为这可能是一场伟大的跨党派捍卫民主制度运动的开始。

BILL MOYERS: Trump is still making false and exaggerated claims about voter fraud and voting by mail. 比尔·莫耶斯:特朗普仍然在就选民欺诈和邮寄投票发表虚假和夸大的言论。 Did you hear any of the robocalls that the Republicans have unleashed, urging Trump voters to vote by absentee ballot in the election, but not to vote by mail, because they said, while absentee ballots are safe and secure, voting by mail can be fraudulent. |||||||||||释放|催促||||||缺席||||||||||||||||||||||||||欺诈 ||||||appels automatisés|||||lancé|incitant||||||par procuration|||||||||||||||par procuration|||||||||||frauduleux I mean, just weird, because they're really essentially the same, absentee ballots and voting by mail. ||||||||||缺席||||| And I listened to the tape of the robocall: ||||||||自动电话 ||||||||appel automatisé

KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE: President Trump needs you to join him in voting absentee this year… Absentee voting is safe, secure and supported by President Trump. |吉尔福伊尔|||||||||||||||||||||| |Guilfoyle|||||||||||||||||||||| The radical left wants universal vote-by-mail, which is proven to be filled with fraud, abuse and mistakes. |激进派||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||prouvé|||rempli|||||

BILL MOYERS: These robocalls were done by two people, Donald Trump Jr. |||||||||||小 |||||||||||Donald Trump Jr. 's girlfriend and his daughter-in-law, saying confusing things about absentee ballots and voting by mail. What's going on there?

LISA GRAVES: This is new, this sort of twist that they've put on it this past week with those robocalls in saying, definitely get your absentee ballot, but don't vote by mail, when, in fact, you know, Americans use the mail for all sorts of important sensitive things. ||||||||tournure||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| We mail our taxes, although some people do it electronically now because it's more convenient, but not because it wasn't safe. |||税务||||||||||||||||| |||impôts||||||électroniquement||||||||||| People get their tax refunds often by mail. ||||remboursements d'impôts||| 人们经常通过邮寄方式收到退税。 People mail their bills by mail, get checks by mail. 人们通过邮寄方式寄送账单,通过邮寄方式收到支票。 You go to the post office and drop off your mail or put the mail in your mailbox. 您可以去邮局投递邮件,或者将邮件放入邮箱。 It's actually a crime to remove the mail from someone else's mailbox. And, in fact, by the way, that's something that surprisingly came up in connection with Louis DeJoy, where his brother, his own brother accused him of stealing his mail, of opening secret bank accounts in his name and then hiding the mail from him for five years, which we've never seen alleged against a postmaster general in history. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||邮递员||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||prétendu|||||| 实际上,顺便说一句,这确实是与路易斯·德乔伊有关的令人惊讶的事情,他的兄弟,他自己的兄弟指控他偷了他的邮件,在他的名下开设秘密银行账户,然后把邮件藏了五年,这在历史上从未有过针对邮政总局局长的指控。 Of course, he denied it and settled that case. 当然,他否认了这一点,并解决了该案。 But, you know, stealing people's mail is a crime. 但是,你知道,偷别人的邮件是一种犯罪。 And that crime is prosecuted in America. ||||起诉|| It does happen from time to time. But there's no evidence that there's some band of ballot thieves out there stealing people's ballots out of mailboxes or out of the post office. |||||||团伙||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||boîtes aux lettres|||||| 但没有证据表明有一伙盗取选票的盗贼在偷走人们邮箱或邮局里的选票。 There are concerns about the man who's at the head of the post office making things into a chaotic circumstance that delays the ballots and makes it harder for them to get counted. |||||||||||||||||||||retarde||||||||||| 人们对邮局负责人使事情变得混乱,导致选票延误,增加计票难度感到担忧。 That's, I think, a worry that I have. 我想,这就是我所担心的。 But this notion put forward by these two members of Trump's team that they should request absentee ballots but not vote by mail because there's some conspiracy that Democrats are somehow stealing the mail out of their mailboxes is just nonsense. ||||||||||||||||缺席|||||||||||||||||||||||| 但是特朗普团队的两名成员提出的这一观点,即他们应该申请缺席选票,但不应邮寄投票,因为某种阴谋使得民主党人以某种方式从他们的邮箱中偷走邮寄物,这简直是胡说八道。 During the 2016 Election after Donald Trump claimed that more than three million ballots had been cast fraudulently, which just happened to be the same number that he lost by in the popular vote – no coincidence there, right – after that, there was an investigation of how many people were actually prosecuted and there were four cases out of, you know, millions and millions of ballots cast. |||||||||||||||投票||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||起诉||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||déposés|frauduleusement||||||||||||||||||||||||||enquête|||||||||||||||||||||| 在2016年选举中,唐纳德·特朗普声称有超过三百万张选票是欺诈性投票,而这个数字恰好是他在普选中失利的数量——这不是巧合,对吧——之后,对实际上有多少人受到起诉进行了调查,在数百万张选票中,仅有四个案件。 And, interestingly, all four of those cases were Republicans, which was, you know, a surprise that that was the outcome. 有趣的是,这四个案件中的所有被告都是共和党人,这让人感到惊讶,结果就是这样的。 But four out of hundreds of millions of votes cast, in the sense of all the different votes at the primary and general level in 2016, cumulatively. |||||||||exprimés||||||||||||||||cumulativement 但在数亿张选票中,2016年初选和普选的所有不同选票累计来看,只有四张。 And, you know, in the course of more than a billion ballots cast, voter fraud is extremely rare. ||||||||||||déposés||||| 而且,你知道,在超过十亿张选票的投票过程中,选民欺诈极为罕见。 But what's not rare is voter suppression. ||||||压制 但是,选民压制却并不罕见。 And what's not rare is this effort to kick people off the voting rolls because they didn't vote in a primary or they didn't vote in a midterm election, and make it harder for them to vote so that their vote is, quote, “a provisional ballot,” that doesn't count that day if they have to pass it that day. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||中期|||||||||||||||||临时的|||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||élection de mi-mandat|||||||||||||||||provisoire|||||||||||||| 而不稀有的是这种努力,即因为人们在初选中未投票或在中期选举中未投票而将他们从选民名单上踢掉,并使他们投票变得更困难,以至于他们的投票被称为“临时选票”,如果他们那天必须通过,今天是无法计算的。 And then people wonder, “Should I wait in line because will my vote count?” Yes, you should wait in line. 然后人们会问:‘我应该在队伍中等吗,因为我的投票会算数吗?’是的,你应该在队伍中等。 Yes, we need people to vote to have their votes cast and have their votes counted. 是的,我们需要人们投票,让他们的投票被记录并得到计算。 But what's happening right now is that you have this battle going on, orchestrated by Trump's team to attack voting by mail in the states, to attack measures to make it easier in a deadly pandemic for people to cast their vote. |||||||||||||策划|||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||orchestré|||||||||||||||||||||mortelle|||||exprimer leur vote|| And we're gonna see this effort by the president to claim victory on Election Day or Election Night, based on in-person ballots, and to have his legal team fight to stop the counting of mailed-in ballots or absentee ballots that are delivered to ballot boxes and to try to claim that those ballots are somehow fraudulent if the count goes toward Biden, his opponent. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||frauduleux||||||son adversaire Biden|| They've already telegraphed that this is their plan. ||annoncé||||| They've already said it out loud. Jim Jordan said it expressly during the hearing with Mr. DeJoy, that the president's gonna win on Tuesday night, November 3rd, and that then all these ballots will be counted, and that will somehow be a fraud. ||||明确地|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||explicitement|||||||||du président||||||||||||||||||||||| Well, the fact is, is that because we're in a pandemic, we are gonna have more people voting remotely than probably ever before. ||||||||||||||||||à distance|||| And those ballots of the American people need to be counted. But this president and his henchmen, in Congress, and in the Administration are trying to set up a scenario in which he gets to declare himself a winner, even if he loses, and try to stay in power unjustly if he loses by claiming that the ballots that are mailed are inherently fraudulent or false. |||||爪牙||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||本质上||| |||||hommes de main|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||injustement|||||en affirmant||||||||par nature|frauduleux|| I don't know that we've ever had a president behave in this way, ever. |||||||||se comporter|||| 我不知道我们是否曾经有过这样的总统行为。 I don't even know whether Strom Thurmond as a Dixiecrat you know, even uttered such things, although obviously in that Jim Crow era there was a whole array of tactics to intimidate voters and to try poll taxes and literacy tests and more to try to keep African Americans from voting. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||手段||威胁||||||||识字||||||||||| |||||Strom Thurmond|Strom Thurmond|||Dixiecrat||||prononcé||||||||Jim Crow||||||gamme complète||||intimider|||||taxe de vote|||tests d'alphabétisation||||||||||| 我甚至不知道斯特罗姆·瑟蒙德作为一名南方民主党人是否曾说过这样的话,尽管显然在那个吉姆·克劳时代,有一整套威胁选民的策略,试图实施人头税和文化测试等更多手段,以阻止非裔美国人投票。 But in modern American history, I don't think we've ever had a president or a party who has so grotesquely attacked the core rote in a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, which is the right to vote and have that vote be counted. |||||||||||||||||||如此荒谬地|||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||de manière grotesque|||noyau essentiel|apprentissage mécanique|||||||||||||||||||||||| 但是在现代美国历史上,我认为我们从未有过一个总统或一个政党如此畸形地攻击民主的核心原则:人民的权利,由人民掌握,为人民服务,即投票权以及让这一投票被计算在内。

BILL MOYERS: So if the scenario unfolds as you've just described it on Election Day and Election Night, what should people do? ||||||展开||||||||||||||| ||||||se déroule|||||||||||||||

LISA GRAVES: Oooh. ||Oh là là. I think that prevention is the best medicine. |||预防|||| Everybody needs to make sure that they are registered. You can call your county. ||||votre département You can check online. There are a number of reputable sources for checking whether you are registered. |||||réputé||||||| Make sure you're registered to vote. Make a plan for voting. Make sure that you have a plan. Are you going to vote? Are you gonna request an absentee ballot, if you can? 如果可以的话你会申请缺席投票吗? Are you in a state where your absentee ballot is already coming because it's automatically mailed to you? 你所在的州是否已经自动邮寄给你缺席投票? Once you have your ballot, what is your plan for getting it counted? 一旦你收到选票,你打算怎么确保它被统计? Are you gonna mail it in? Are you going to make sure that you have signed it appropriately or had a witness in some states that requires a witness? Make sure you have the envelope. If there's a requirement of an outer envelope, that that envelope be used and that it be signed. |||exigence|||extérieure||||||||||| You know, just follow the rules, check them twice and then check them one more time to make sure that your ballot can't be disqualified by some partisan trying to deny your vote its power. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||党派的||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||invalidé|||||||||| Are you voting in person? If you are, can you make sure that you can stay in that line as long as possible– you know, that you have taken time off from work if you can or that you have arrangements made for you to be in that line, to stay until your vote, your ballot is cast? |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||dispositions prises|||||||||||||||||déposé And then there's also a need for people to be monitors to make sure that the ballots are counted. ||||||||||observateurs|||||||| And also, on Election Day, younger people who are not as high a risk as others, have been asked to volunteer at precincts, to sit at the table, to check voters in and check their names off the list. ||||||||||||||||||||||投票站|||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||bureaux de vote|||||||||||||||| There's opportunities to volunteer to be an independent and fair administrator of the election. And then in terms of the counting I think we're gonna have to just say that every ballot in America that's cast needs to be counted. And there's no decision until all the ballots are counted. I don't think that this desire by some news stations to call a winner as quickly as possible– I think that's unhealthy for our democracy. And it's particularly unhealthy in this environment, where we know there are gonna be a number of absentee ballots cast by mail or by ballot boxes. We have to insist that no one be declared a winner until they're actually a winner. And we have to insist that our votes be counted. And that may require people engaging in non-violent action of being in the street, being at the courthouses, being at the clerk's office, peacefully demanding that in our democracy our ballots all be counted. ||||||||||||||||||tribunaux||||du greffier||pacifiquement||||||||||

BILL MOYERS: Lisa Graves, thank you very much.

LISA GRAVES: Thank you.

ANNOUNCER: Thanks for listening to Moyers on Democracy. You'll find more from Lisa Graves about the post office fight on Billmoyers.com. Until next time, all this and more at Billmoyers.com.